Anonymous
×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 106 articles on MOR Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

Revision as of 15:54, 18 November 2011 by Feng (talk | contribs)


Description of the process

Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy (SECM) finds many applications in current problems in the biological field. Quantitative mathematical models have been developed for different operating modes of the SECM. Except for some very specific problems, like the diffusion-controlled current on a circular electrode far away from the border, solutions can only be obtained by numerical simulation, which is based on discretization of the model in space by an appropriate method like finite differences, finite elements, or boundary elements. After discretization, a high-dimensional system of ordinary differential equations is obtained. Its high dimensionality leads to high computational cost.

We consider a cylindrical electrode in Fig.1. The computation domain under the 2D-axisymmetrical approximation includes the electrolyte under the electrode. We assume that the concentration does not depend on the rotation angle. A single chemical reaction takes place on the electrode:

Ox+eRed, (1)

where Ox and Red are two different species in the reaction. According to the theory of SECM [2], the species transport in the electrolyte is described by diffusion only. The diffusion partial differential equation is given by the second Fick law as follows

dc1dt=D1Δ2c1,dc2dt=D2Δ2c2,

where c1 and c2 is the concentration field of species Ox and Red respectively. The initial conditions are c1(0)=c1,0,c2(0)=c2,0. Conditions at the glass and the bottom of the bath are described by the Neumann boundary conditions of zero flux c1n=0,c2n=0. Conditions at the border to the bulk are described by Dirichlet boundary conditions of constant concentration, equal to the initial conditions c1=c1,0, c2=c2,0. The boundary conditions at the electrode are described by

c1n=j,c2n=j.

Here j is related to the forward reaction rate kf and the backward reaction rate kb through the Buttler-Volmer equation,

j=kfc1kbc2.

The reaction rate $k_f$ and $k_b$ are in the follow forms,

kf=k0exp(αzF(v(t)v0)RT)kb=k0exp((1α)zF(v(t)v0)RT).

Here, k0 is the heterogeneous standard rate constant, and is an empirical transmission factor for a heterogeneous reaction. F is the Faraday-constant, R is the gas constant, T is the temperature and z is the number of exchanged electrons per reaction. u(t)=v(t)v0 is the difference between the electrode potential and the reference potential. This difference, to which we refer below as voltage, is changed during the measurement of a voltammogram.


Description of the model

The control volume method has been used for the spatial discretization of(1). Together with the boundary conditions, the resulted system of ordinary differential equations are as follows,

Edcdt+K(u(t))cAc=B,y(t)=Cc,c(0)=c00,

where E and K(u(t)) are system matrices, K(u(t)) is a function of voltage that in turn depends on time. The voltage appears in the system matrix due to the boundary conditions~(\ref{b3}). The vector cn is the vector of unknown concentrations, which includes both the Ox and Red species. The vector B is the load vector, which arises as a consequence of the Dirichlet boundary conditions imposed at the bulk boundary of the electrolyte. The total current is computed as an integral (sum) over the electrode surface. The matrix K(u(t)) has the following form,

K(u(t))=K1(u(t))+K2(u(t)),

where Ki(u(t))=hiDi,i=1,2, and h1=exp(βu(t)), h2=exp(βu(t)) with u(t)=v(t)v0. The the voltage u(t) is a function of σ,

u(t)=σt1,t2σ,u(t)=σt+3,2σ<t4σ,

where σ can take four different values, σ=0.5,0.05,0.005,0.0005. The constant β is computed from the parameters α,z,F,R, and T, giving a value of β=21.243036728240824.

Although the system is a time-varying system, it can be considered as a parametrized systems with two parameters h1 and h2.