Anonymous
×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 106 articles on MOR Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Reduced Basis PMOR method: Difference between revisions

Hessm (talk | contribs)
Hessm (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:method]]
[[Category:method]]
[[Category:parametric method]]
[[Category:parametric]]


The Reduced Basis Method (RBM) we present here is applicable to static and time-dependent linear PDEs.
==Description==
 
The '''Reduced Basis Method'''<ref name="rozza08"/>, <ref name="grepl05"/> (RBM) we present here is a [[Projection based MOR]] method, applicable to static and time-dependent linear PDEs.


==Time-Independent PDEs==
==Time-Independent PDEs==
Line 14: Line 16:
The exact, infinite-dimensional formulation, indicated by the superscript e, is given by
The exact, infinite-dimensional formulation, indicated by the superscript e, is given by


 
:<math>
<math>
\begin{cases}
\begin{cases}
\text{For } \mu \in \mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{R}^P, \text{ evaluate } \\
\text{For } \mu \in \mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{R}^P, \text{ evaluate } \\
Line 26: Line 27:
Through spatial discretization, e.g. finite element method, we consider the discretized system
Through spatial discretization, e.g. finite element method, we consider the discretized system


<math>
:<math>
\begin{cases}
\begin{cases}
\text{For } \mu \in \mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{R}^P, \text{ evaluate } \\
\text{For } \mu \in \mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{R}^P, \text{ evaluate } \\
Line 43: Line 44:
The essential assumption which allows the offline-online decomposition is that there exists an affine parameter dependence
The essential assumption which allows the offline-online decomposition is that there exists an affine parameter dependence


<math>
:<math>
  a(w,v;\mu) = \sum_{q=1}^{Q^a} \Theta_a^q(\mu) a^q(w,v)  
  a(w,v;\mu) = \sum_{q=1}^{Q^a} \Theta_a^q(\mu) a^q(w,v)  
</math>
</math>


<math>
:<math>
  f(v;\mu) = \sum_{q=1}^{Q^f} \Theta_f^{q}(\mu) f^q(v).
  f(v;\mu) = \sum_{q=1}^{Q^f} \Theta_f^{q}(\mu) f^q(v).
</math>
</math>
Line 53: Line 54:
The Lagrange Reduced Basis space is established by iteratively choosing Lagrange parameter samples  
The Lagrange Reduced Basis space is established by iteratively choosing Lagrange parameter samples  


<math>  
:<math>  
S_N = \{\mu^1,...,\mu^N\}  
S_N = \{\mu^1,...,\mu^N\}  
</math>  
</math>  
Line 59: Line 60:
and considering the associated Lagrange RB spaces  
and considering the associated Lagrange RB spaces  


<math>  
:<math>  
V_N = \text{span}\{u(\mu^n), 1 \leq n \leq N \}  
V_N = \text{span}\{u(\mu^n), 1 \leq n \leq N \}  
</math>
</math>
Line 67: Line 68:
We then consider the galerkin projection onto the RB-space  <math> V_N </math>
We then consider the galerkin projection onto the RB-space  <math> V_N </math>


<math>
:<math>
\begin{cases}
\begin{cases}
\text{For } \mu \in \mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{R}^P, \text{ evaluate } \\
\text{For } \mu \in \mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{R}^P, \text{ evaluate } \\
Line 101: Line 102:
The exact, infinite-dimensional formulation, indicated by the superscript e, is given by
The exact, infinite-dimensional formulation, indicated by the superscript e, is given by


<math>
:<math>
\begin{cases}
\begin{cases}
\text{For } \mu \in \mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{R}^P, t^k \in [0,T] \text{ evaluate } \\
\text{For } \mu \in \mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{R}^P, t^k \in [0,T] \text{ evaluate } \\
Line 115: Line 116:
Assume a reference discretization form is given as follows,
Assume a reference discretization form is given as follows,


<math>
:<math>
\begin{cases}
\begin{cases}
\text{For } \mu \in \mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{R}^P, t^k \in [0,T] \text{ evaluate } \\
\text{For } \mu \in \mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{R}^P, t^k \in [0,T] \text{ evaluate } \\
Line 130: Line 131:
To apply the offline-online decomposition, we assume they are affine parameter-dependent, i.e.
To apply the offline-online decomposition, we assume they are affine parameter-dependent, i.e.


<math>
:<math>
  m(w,v;\mu) = \sum_{q=1}^{Q_m} \Theta_m^q(\mu,t) m^q(w,v)  
  m(w,v;\mu) = \sum_{q=1}^{Q_m} \Theta_m^q(\mu,t) m^q(w,v)  
</math>
</math>


<math>
:<math>
  a(w,v;\mu) = \sum_{q=1}^{Q_a} \Theta_a^q(\mu,t) a^q(w,v)  
  a(w,v;\mu) = \sum_{q=1}^{Q_a} \Theta_a^q(\mu,t) a^q(w,v)  
</math>
</math>


<math>
:<math>
  f(v;\mu) = \sum_{q=1}^{Q_f} \Theta_f^{q}(\mu,t) f^q(v).
  f(v;\mu) = \sum_{q=1}^{Q_f} \Theta_f^{q}(\mu,t) f^q(v).
</math>
</math>


The Lagrange Reduced Basis space <math> V_N </math> is usually established by POD-Greedy algorithm [3]. Then the input-output response can be presented as follows, through Galerkin projection,
The Lagrange Reduced Basis space <math> V_N </math> is usually established by POD-Greedy algorithm <ref name="haasdonk08"/>. Then the input-output response can be presented as follows, through Galerkin projection,


<math>
:<math>
\begin{cases}
\begin{cases}
\text{For } \mu \in \mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{R}^P, t^k \in [0,T] \text{ evaluate } \\
\text{For } \mu \in \mathcal{D} \subset \mathbb{R}^P, t^k \in [0,T] \text{ evaluate } \\
Line 154: Line 155:
</math>
</math>


Note that the assumption of affine form can be relaxed in practice, then empirical interpolation [1] methods can be exploited for  
Note that the assumption of affine form can be relaxed in practice, then the empirical interpolation method <ref name="barrault04"/> can be exploited for  
offline-online decomposition.
offline-online decomposition.
This method has been used for [[Batch_Chromatography|Batch Chromatography]], where the empirical interpolation method was used for treating the nonaffinity.


==References==
==References==
[1] M. Barrault, Y. Maday, N. Nguyen, and A. Patera,
An `empirical interpolation' method: application
to effcient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations,
C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris Series I, 339 (2004), 667-672.


[2] M. Grepl,
<references>
Reduced--basis approximations and posteriori error estimation for parabolic partial differential equations,  
 
PhD thesis, MIT, 2005.
<ref name="barrault04"> M. Barrault, Y. Maday, N.C. Nguyen, and A.T. Patera, "<span class="plainlinks">[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2004.08.006 An 'empirical interpolation' method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations]</span>", C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Series I, 339 (2004), 667-672.</ref>


[3] B. Haasdonk and M. Ohlberger,
<ref name="grepl05">M. Grepl, "<span class="plainlinks">[http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/32387 Reduced--basis approximations and posteriori error estimation for parabolic partial differential equations]</span>" PhD thesis, MIT, 2005.</ref>
Reduced basis method for finite volume approximations of parameterized linear evolution equations,  
Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Analysis, 42 (2008), 277-302.


[4] G. Rozza, D.B.P. Huynh, A.T. Patera
<ref name="haasdonk08"> B. Haasdonk and M. Ohlberger, "<span class="plainlinks">[http://www.agh.ians.uni-stuttgart.de/publications/2008/HO08b Reduced basis method for finite volume approximations of parameterized linear evolution equations]</span>", Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Analysis, 42 (2008), 277-302.</ref>
Reduced Basis Approximation and a Posteriori Error Estimation for Affinely Parametrized Elliptic Coercive Partial Differential Equations,
Arch Comput Methods Eng (2008) 15: 229–275.


<ref name="rozza08">G. Rozza, D.B.P. Huynh, A.T. Patera, "<span class="plainlinks">[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11831-008-9019-9 Reduced Basis Approximation and a Posteriori Error Estimation for Affinely Parametrized Elliptic Coercive Partial Differential Equations]</span>", Arch Comput Methods Eng (2008) 15: 229–275.</ref>


</references>


Contact information:
==Contact==


'' [[User:hessm|Martin Hess]]''
'' [[User:hessm|Martin Hess]]''


'' [[User:Zhangy|Yongjin Zhang]]''
'' [[User:Zhangy|Yongjin Zhang]]''

Latest revision as of 07:58, 23 May 2013


Description

The Reduced Basis Method[1], [2] (RBM) we present here is a Projection based MOR method, applicable to static and time-dependent linear PDEs.

Time-Independent PDEs

The typical model problem of the RBM consists of a parametrized PDE stated in weak form with bilinear form a(,;μ) and linear form f(;μ). The parameter μ is considered within a domain 𝒟 and we are interested in an output quantity s(μ) which can be expressed via a linear functional l(;μ) of the field variable u(μ).

The exact, infinite-dimensional formulation, indicated by the superscript e, is given by

{For μ𝒟P, evaluate se(μ)=l(ue(μ);μ),where ue(μ)Xe(Ω) satisfies a(ue(μ),v;μ)=f(v;μ),vXe.

Through spatial discretization, e.g. finite element method, we consider the discretized system

{For μ𝒟P, evaluate s(μ)=l(u(μ);μ),where u(μ)X(Ω) satisfies a(u(μ),v;μ)=f(v;μ),vX.

The underlying assumption of the RBM is that the parametrically induced manifold ={u(μ)|μ𝒟} can be approximated by a low dimensional space VN.

It also applies the concept of an offline-online decomposition, in that a large pre-processing offline cost is acceptable in view of a very low online cost (of a reduced order model) for each input-output evaluation, when in a many-query or real-time context.

The essential assumption which allows the offline-online decomposition is that there exists an affine parameter dependence

a(w,v;μ)=q=1QaΘaq(μ)aq(w,v)
f(v;μ)=q=1QfΘfq(μ)fq(v).

The Lagrange Reduced Basis space is established by iteratively choosing Lagrange parameter samples

SN={μ1,...,μN}

and considering the associated Lagrange RB spaces

VN=span{u(μn),1nN}

in a greedy sampling process. This leads to hierarchical RB spaces: V1V2...VNmax.

We then consider the galerkin projection onto the RB-space VN

{For μ𝒟P, evaluate sN(μ)=l(uN(μ)),where uN(μ)VN satisfies a(uN(μ),v;μ)=f(v),vVN

The greedy sampling uses an error estimator ot error indicator ΔN(μ) for the approximation error u(μ)uN(μ).

Steps of the greedy sampling process:

1. Let Ξ denote a finite sample of 𝒟 and set S1={μ1} and V1=span{u(μ1)}.

2. For N=2,...,Nmax, find μN=arg maxμΞΔN1(μ),

3. Set SN=SN1μN,VN=VN1+span{u(μN)}.

This method is used in the following models:

Coplanar_Waveguide

Branchline Coupler

Time-Dependent PDEs

When time is involved, it can be roughly considered as an usual parameter just as time-independent case. But more attention should be paid to the dynamics of the system and the stability is also a major concern, especially for the nonlinear case. Mostly, we use the same notation as time-independent case except the variable t is added explicitly.

The exact, infinite-dimensional formulation, indicated by the superscript e, is given by

{For μ𝒟P,tk[0,T] evaluate se(μ,tk)=l(ue(μ,t);μ),where ue(μ,t)Xe(Ω) satisfies m(ue(μ,tk),v;μ)+Δta(ue(μ,tk),v;μ)=m(ue(μ,tk1),v;μ)+Δtf(v;μ)ue(μ,tk),vXe.

Here m(,;μ) is also a bilinear form.

Assume a reference discretization form is given as follows,

{For μ𝒟P,tk[0,T] evaluate s(μ,tk)=l(u(μ,t);μ),where u(μ,t)X𝒩(Ω) satisfies m(u(μ,tk),v;μ)+Δta(u(μ,tk),v;μ)=m(u(μ,tk1),v;μ)+Δtf(v;μ)u(μ,tk),vX𝒩.

The underlying assumption of the RBM is that the parametrically induced manifold ={u(μ,t)|μ𝒟} can be approximated by a low dimensional space VN.

To apply the offline-online decomposition, we assume they are affine parameter-dependent, i.e.

m(w,v;μ)=q=1QmΘmq(μ,t)mq(w,v)
a(w,v;μ)=q=1QaΘaq(μ,t)aq(w,v)
f(v;μ)=q=1QfΘfq(μ,t)fq(v).

The Lagrange Reduced Basis space VN is usually established by POD-Greedy algorithm [3]. Then the input-output response can be presented as follows, through Galerkin projection,

{For μ𝒟P,tk[0,T] evaluate s(μ,tk)=l(uN(μ,t);μ),where uN(μ,t)XN(Ω) satisfies m(uN(μ,tk),v;μ)+Δta(uN(μ,tk),v;μ)=m(uN(μ,tk1),v;μ)+Δtf(v;μ)uN(μ,tk),vXN.

Note that the assumption of affine form can be relaxed in practice, then the empirical interpolation method [4] can be exploited for offline-online decomposition.

This method has been used for Batch Chromatography, where the empirical interpolation method was used for treating the nonaffinity.

References

  1. G. Rozza, D.B.P. Huynh, A.T. Patera, "Reduced Basis Approximation and a Posteriori Error Estimation for Affinely Parametrized Elliptic Coercive Partial Differential Equations", Arch Comput Methods Eng (2008) 15: 229–275.
  2. M. Grepl, "Reduced--basis approximations and posteriori error estimation for parabolic partial differential equations" PhD thesis, MIT, 2005.
  3. B. Haasdonk and M. Ohlberger, "Reduced basis method for finite volume approximations of parameterized linear evolution equations", Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Analysis, 42 (2008), 277-302.
  4. M. Barrault, Y. Maday, N.C. Nguyen, and A.T. Patera, "An 'empirical interpolation' method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations", C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Series I, 339 (2004), 667-672.

Contact

Martin Hess

Yongjin Zhang