<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Feng</id>
	<title>MOR Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Feng"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/Special:Contributions/Feng"/>
	<updated>2026-04-13T00:18:00Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Modified_Gyroscope&amp;diff=2982</id>
		<title>Modified Gyroscope</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Modified_Gyroscope&amp;diff=2982"/>
		<updated>2019-09-20T10:11:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Dimensions */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ODE]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:parametric 2-5 parameters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:affine parameter representation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:second differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;figure id=&amp;quot;fig:gyro&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:Gyroscope.jpg|300px|thumb|right|&amp;lt;caption&amp;gt;Schematic representation of the gyroscope.&amp;lt;/caption&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/figure&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device is a [[wikipedia:Vibrating_structure_gyroscope#MEMS_gyroscopes|MEMS gyroscope]] based on the butterfly gyroscope &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;lienemann2004&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; developed at the [http://www.imego.com/ Imego institute] in Gothenburg,&lt;br /&gt;
Sweden (see also: [[Butterfly_Gyroscope|Butterfly Gyroscope]], where a non-parametrized model for the device is given).&lt;br /&gt;
A [[wikipedia:Gyroscope|gyroscope]] is a device used to measure angular rates in up to three axes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The basic working principle of the &#039;&#039;&#039;gyroscope&#039;&#039;&#039; can be described as follows, see also &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Moo07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Without applied external rotation, the paddles vibrate in phase with the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; see &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;fig:gyro&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Under the influence of an external rotation about the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-axis (drawn in red),&lt;br /&gt;
an additional force due to the Coriolis acceleration acts upon the paddles. &lt;br /&gt;
This force leads to an additional small out-of-phase vibration between two paddles on the same side of the bearing.&lt;br /&gt;
This out-of phase vibration is measured as the difference of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-displacement of the nodes with the red dots.&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, measuring the displacement of two adjacent paddles, the rotation velocity can be ascertained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Motivation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When planning for and making decisions on future improvements of the butterfly gyroscope, it is of importance to improve the efficiency of the gyro simulations. Repeated analysis of the sensor structure have to be conducted with respect to a number of important issues.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples of such are sensitivity to shock, linear and angular vibration sensitivity, reaction to large rates and/or acceleration,&lt;br /&gt;
different types of excitation load cases and the effect of force-feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
The use of model order reduction indeed decreases run time for repeated simulations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Parametrized Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two parameters are of special interest for the model.&lt;br /&gt;
The first one is the quantity that is to be sensed, the rotation velocity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-axes. &lt;br /&gt;
The second parameter is the width of the bearing, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
The parametrized system below is obtained by finite element discretization of the parametrized model (in the form of partial differential equations) for the &#039;&#039;&#039;gyroscope&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
The details of constructing the parametrized system can be found in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Moo07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
The system is of the following form:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
M(d)\ddot{x}(t) +D(\theta)\dot{x}(t) +T(d)x(t) &amp;amp;= B, \\&lt;br /&gt;
y(t) &amp;amp;=Cx(t).&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M(d)=(M_1+dM_2)\in \mathbb R^{n\times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the mass matrix, &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D(d,\theta)=\theta(D_1 + d D_2)\in \mathbb R^{n\times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the damping matrix, &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T(d)=T_1+(1/d)T_2+dT_3\in \mathbb R^{n\times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the stiffness matrix, &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B \in \mathbb R^{n \times 1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the load vector,&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C \in \mathbb R^{1 \times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the output matrix,&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x \in \mathbb R^{n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the state vector,&lt;br /&gt;
* and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y \in \mathbb R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the output response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quantity of interesting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the system is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
which is the difference of the displacement &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; between the two red markings on the &#039;&#039;east&#039;&#039; side of the bearing (see &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;fig:gyro&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The parameters of the system, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
represent the width of the bearing(&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) and the rotation velocity along the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-axis (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;),&lt;br /&gt;
with the ranges: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta\in [10^{-7}, 10^{-5}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\in [1,2]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device works in the frequency range &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f \in [0.025, 0.25]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;MHz and the degrees of freedom are &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n = 17913&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The model is generated in ANSYS.&lt;br /&gt;
The system matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_1, \, M_2, \, D_1, \, D_2, \, T_1, \, T_2, \,T_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are in the [http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/ MatrixMarket format], and can be downloaded here: [[Media: Gyroscope_modi.tgz|Gyroscope_modi.tgz]].&lt;br /&gt;
The matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defines the output, which has zeros on all the entries, except on the 2315th entry, where the value is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and on the 5806th entry, the value is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;;&lt;br /&gt;
in MATLAB notation, it is &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;C(1,2315) = -1&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;C(1,5806) = 1&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dimensions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
System structure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{rcl}&lt;br /&gt;
(M_1 + d M_2)\ddot{x}(t) + \theta(D_1 + d D_2) \dot{x}(t) + (T_1 + d^{-1} T_2 + d T_3)x(t) &amp;amp;=&amp;amp; B \\&lt;br /&gt;
y(t) &amp;amp;=&amp;amp; Cx(t)&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
System dimensions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_1, M_2, D_1, D_2, T_1, T_2, T_3 \in \mathbb{R}^{17931 \times 17931}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B \in \mathbb{R}^{17931 \times 1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C \in \mathbb{R}^{1 \times 17931}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Citation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To cite this benchmark, use the following references:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the benchmark itself and its data:&lt;br /&gt;
::The MORwiki Community, &#039;&#039;&#039;Modified Gyroscope&#039;&#039;&#039;. MORwiki - Model Order Reduction Wiki, 2018. http://modelreduction.org/index.php/Modified_Gyroscope &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 @MISC{morwiki_modgyro,&lt;br /&gt;
   author =       &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{The MORwiki Community}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
   title =        {Modified Gyroscope},&lt;br /&gt;
   howpublished = {{MORwiki} -- Model Order Reduction Wiki},&lt;br /&gt;
   url =          &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{http://modelreduction.org/index.php/Modified_Gyroscope}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
   year =         2018&lt;br /&gt;
 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the background on the benchmark: &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://morwiki.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/BibTeX/#morMoo07 morMoo07]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://morwiki.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/BibTeX/html/mor_bib.html#morMoo07 BibTeX]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;lienemann2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Lienemann, D. Billger, E. B. Rudnyi, A. Greiner, J. G. Korvink, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.nsti.org/procs/Nanotech2004v2/6/W58.01 MEMS Compact Modeling Meets Model Order Reduction: Examples of the Application of Arnoldi Methods to Microsystem Devices]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, TechConnect Briefs (Technical Proceedings of the 2004 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show, Volume 2): 303--306, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Moo07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;C. Moosmann, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/3971/ ParaMOR Model Order Reduction for parameterized MEMS applications]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, PhD thesis, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; [[User:Feng]] &#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Modified_Gyroscope&amp;diff=2981</id>
		<title>Modified Gyroscope</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Modified_Gyroscope&amp;diff=2981"/>
		<updated>2019-09-20T10:11:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Data */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ODE]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:parametric 2-5 parameters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:affine parameter representation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:second differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;figure id=&amp;quot;fig:gyro&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:Gyroscope.jpg|300px|thumb|right|&amp;lt;caption&amp;gt;Schematic representation of the gyroscope.&amp;lt;/caption&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/figure&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device is a [[wikipedia:Vibrating_structure_gyroscope#MEMS_gyroscopes|MEMS gyroscope]] based on the butterfly gyroscope &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;lienemann2004&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; developed at the [http://www.imego.com/ Imego institute] in Gothenburg,&lt;br /&gt;
Sweden (see also: [[Butterfly_Gyroscope|Butterfly Gyroscope]], where a non-parametrized model for the device is given).&lt;br /&gt;
A [[wikipedia:Gyroscope|gyroscope]] is a device used to measure angular rates in up to three axes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The basic working principle of the &#039;&#039;&#039;gyroscope&#039;&#039;&#039; can be described as follows, see also &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Moo07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Without applied external rotation, the paddles vibrate in phase with the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; see &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;fig:gyro&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Under the influence of an external rotation about the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-axis (drawn in red),&lt;br /&gt;
an additional force due to the Coriolis acceleration acts upon the paddles. &lt;br /&gt;
This force leads to an additional small out-of-phase vibration between two paddles on the same side of the bearing.&lt;br /&gt;
This out-of phase vibration is measured as the difference of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-displacement of the nodes with the red dots.&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, measuring the displacement of two adjacent paddles, the rotation velocity can be ascertained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Motivation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When planning for and making decisions on future improvements of the butterfly gyroscope, it is of importance to improve the efficiency of the gyro simulations. Repeated analysis of the sensor structure have to be conducted with respect to a number of important issues.&lt;br /&gt;
Examples of such are sensitivity to shock, linear and angular vibration sensitivity, reaction to large rates and/or acceleration,&lt;br /&gt;
different types of excitation load cases and the effect of force-feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
The use of model order reduction indeed decreases run time for repeated simulations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Parametrized Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two parameters are of special interest for the model.&lt;br /&gt;
The first one is the quantity that is to be sensed, the rotation velocity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-axes. &lt;br /&gt;
The second parameter is the width of the bearing, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
The parametrized system below is obtained by finite element discretization of the parametrized model (in the form of partial differential equations) for the &#039;&#039;&#039;gyroscope&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
The details of constructing the parametrized system can be found in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Moo07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
The system is of the following form:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
M(d)\ddot{x}(t) +D(\theta)\dot{x}(t) +T(d)x(t) &amp;amp;= B, \\&lt;br /&gt;
y(t) &amp;amp;=Cx(t).&lt;br /&gt;
\end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M(d)=(M_1+dM_2)\in \mathbb R^{n\times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the mass matrix, &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D(d,\theta)=\theta(D_1 + d D_2)\in \mathbb R^{n\times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the damping matrix, &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T(d)=T_1+(1/d)T_2+dT_3\in \mathbb R^{n\times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the stiffness matrix, &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B \in \mathbb R^{n \times 1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the load vector,&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C \in \mathbb R^{1 \times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the output matrix,&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x \in \mathbb R^{n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the state vector,&lt;br /&gt;
* and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y \in \mathbb R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the output response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quantity of interesting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the system is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
which is the difference of the displacement &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; between the two red markings on the &#039;&#039;east&#039;&#039; side of the bearing (see &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;fig:gyro&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The parameters of the system, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
represent the width of the bearing(&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) and the rotation velocity along the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-axis (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;),&lt;br /&gt;
with the ranges: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta\in [10^{-7}, 10^{-5}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\in [1,2]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The device works in the frequency range &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f \in [0.025, 0.25]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;MHz and the degrees of freedom are &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n = 17913&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The model is generated in ANSYS.&lt;br /&gt;
The system matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_1, \, M_2, \, D_1, \, D_2, \, T_1, \, T_2, \,T_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are in the [http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/ MatrixMarket format], and can be downloaded here: [[Media: Gyroscope_modi.tgz|Gyroscope_modi.tgz]].&lt;br /&gt;
The matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defines the output, which has zeros on all the entries, except on the 2315th entry, where the value is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and on the 5806th entry, the value is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;;&lt;br /&gt;
in MATLAB notation, it is &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;C(1,2315) = -1&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;C(1,5806) = 1&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dimensions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
System structure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{array}{rcl}&lt;br /&gt;
(M_1 + d M_2)\ddot{x}(t) + \theta(D_1 + d D_2) \dot{x}(t) + (T_1 + d^{-1} T_2 + d T_3)x(t) &amp;amp;=&amp;amp; B \\&lt;br /&gt;
y(t) &amp;amp;=&amp;amp; Cx(t)&lt;br /&gt;
\end{array}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
System dimensions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_1, M_2, D_1, D_2, T_1, T_2, T_3 \in \mathbb{R}^{17931 \times 17931}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B \in \mathbb{R}^{17931 \times 1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C \in \mathbb{R}^{2 \times 17931}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Citation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To cite this benchmark, use the following references:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the benchmark itself and its data:&lt;br /&gt;
::The MORwiki Community, &#039;&#039;&#039;Modified Gyroscope&#039;&#039;&#039;. MORwiki - Model Order Reduction Wiki, 2018. http://modelreduction.org/index.php/Modified_Gyroscope &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 @MISC{morwiki_modgyro,&lt;br /&gt;
   author =       &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{The MORwiki Community}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
   title =        {Modified Gyroscope},&lt;br /&gt;
   howpublished = {{MORwiki} -- Model Order Reduction Wiki},&lt;br /&gt;
   url =          &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{http://modelreduction.org/index.php/Modified_Gyroscope}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
   year =         2018&lt;br /&gt;
 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the background on the benchmark: &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://morwiki.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/BibTeX/#morMoo07 morMoo07]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; (&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://morwiki.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/BibTeX/html/mor_bib.html#morMoo07 BibTeX]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;lienemann2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Lienemann, D. Billger, E. B. Rudnyi, A. Greiner, J. G. Korvink, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.nsti.org/procs/Nanotech2004v2/6/W58.01 MEMS Compact Modeling Meets Model Order Reduction: Examples of the Application of Arnoldi Methods to Microsystem Devices]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, TechConnect Briefs (Technical Proceedings of the 2004 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show, Volume 2): 303--306, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Moo07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;C. Moosmann, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/3971/ ParaMOR Model Order Reduction for parameterized MEMS applications]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, PhD thesis, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; [[User:Feng]] &#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=User:Feng&amp;diff=2313</id>
		<title>User:Feng</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=User:Feng&amp;diff=2313"/>
		<updated>2018-03-22T08:12:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Lihong Feng &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Max Planck Institute for&lt;br /&gt;
Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Sandtorstr. 1&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
39106 Magdeburg&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Germany&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Phone: 49 391 6110 379 &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E-Mail: feng@mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/person/26568/834763&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Modified_Gyroscope&amp;diff=2127</id>
		<title>Modified Gyroscope</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Modified_Gyroscope&amp;diff=2127"/>
		<updated>2018-03-02T13:28:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ODE]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:parametric 2-5 parameters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:affine parameter representation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:second differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;figure id=&amp;quot;fig:gyro&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:Gyroscope.jpg|300px|thumb|right|&amp;lt;caption&amp;gt;Schematic representation of the gyroscope.&amp;lt;/caption&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/figure&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
The device is a MEMS gyroscope based on the butterfly gyroscope&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. Lienemann, D. Billger, E. B. Rudnyi, A. Greiner, J. G. Korvink, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.nsti.org/procs/Nanotech2004v2/6/W58.01 MEMS Compact Modeling Meets Model Order Reduction: Examples of the Application of Arnoldi Methods to Microsystem Devices]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, Nanotech, 2004, pp. 303–306.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;developed at the Imego institute in Gothenburg, Sweden (see also: [[Butterfly_Gyroscope|Butterfly Gyroscope]], where a non-parametrized model for the device is given ). A &#039;&#039;&#039;gyroscope&#039;&#039;&#039; is a device used to measure angular rates in up to three axes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The basic working principle of the &#039;&#039;&#039;gyroscope&#039;&#039;&#039; can be described as follows, see also &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Moo07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;C. Moosmann, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/3971/ ParaMOR Model Order Reduction for parameterized MEMS applications]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, PhD thesis, Department of Microsystems Engineering,&lt;br /&gt;
University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Without applied external rotation, the paddles vibrate in phase&lt;br /&gt;
with the function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; see &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;fig:gyro&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. Under the influence of an external rotation about the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-axis (drawn&lt;br /&gt;
in red), an additional force due to the Coriolis acceleration acts upon the&lt;br /&gt;
paddles. This force leads to an additional small out-of-phase vibration&lt;br /&gt;
between two paddles on the same side of the bearing. This&lt;br /&gt;
out-of phase vibration is measured as the difference of the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-displacement&lt;br /&gt;
of the nodes with the red dots. Thus, measuring the displacement of two&lt;br /&gt;
adjacent paddles, the rotation velocity can be ascertained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Motivation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When planning for and making decisions on future improvements of the butterfly gyroscope, it is of importance to improve the efficiency of the gyro simulations. Repeated analysis of the sensor structure have to be conducted with respect to a number of important issues. Examples of such are sensitivity to shock, linear and angular vibration sensitivity, reaction to large rates and/or acceleration, different types of excitation load cases and the effect of force-feedback. The use of model order reduction indeed decreases run time for repeated simulations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Parametrized Model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two parameters are of special interest for the model. The first one is the&lt;br /&gt;
quantity that is to be sensed, the rotation velocity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-axes. &lt;br /&gt;
The second parameter is the width of the bearing, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
The parametrized system below is obtained by&lt;br /&gt;
finite element discretization of the parametrized model (in the form of partial differential equations) for the &#039;&#039;&#039;gyroscope&#039;&#039;&#039;. The details of constructing the parametrized system can be found in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Moo07&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The system is of the following&lt;br /&gt;
form:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
M(d)\ddot{x}+D(\theta)\dot{x}+T(d)x=B&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
y=Cx.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M(d)=(M_1+dM_2)\in \mathbb R^{n\times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the mass matrix, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D(\theta)=\theta(D_1+dD_2)\in \mathbb R^{n\times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the damping matrix, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T(d)=T_1+(1/d)T_2+dT_3\in \mathbb R^{n\times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the stiffness matrix, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B \in \mathbb R^{n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the load vector, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C \in \mathbb R^{1 \times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the output matrix, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x \in \mathbb R^{n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the state vector, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y \in \mathbb R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the output response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The variables &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the parameters of the system, where &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the width of the&lt;br /&gt;
bearing and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the rotation velocity along the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The interesting output &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the system is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which is the&lt;br /&gt;
difference of the displacement &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; between the two red dots on&lt;br /&gt;
the same side of the bearing (see &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;fig:gyro&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;). The number of degrees of freedom is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=17913&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The interesting range for the parameters are: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta\in [10^{-7}, 10^{-5}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d\in [1,2]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The device works in the frequency range &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f \in [0.025, 0.25]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The model is generated in ANSYS. The system matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_1, \, M_2, \, D_1, \, D_2, \, T_1, \, T_2, \,T_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are in the [http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/ MatrixMarket format], and can be downloaded here: [[Media: Gyroscope_modi.tgz|Gyroscope_modi.tgz]]. The matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defines the output, which has zeros on all the entries, except on the 2315th entry, where the value is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and on the 5806th entry, the value is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; in MATLAB notation, it is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C(:, 2315)=-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C(:, 5806)=1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Citation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To use this benchmark in any publications, please cite it as below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Cite the link of this web page to indicate the source of the data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Cite the paper @PHDTHESIS{morMoo07...} from the bib file [http://morwiki.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/BibTeX/bibfiles/mor.bib mor.bib] to indicate the technical background and origin of the benchmark. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; [[User:Feng]] &#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=MOR_Wiki:Current_events&amp;diff=1814</id>
		<title>MOR Wiki:Current events</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=MOR_Wiki:Current_events&amp;diff=1814"/>
		<updated>2015-11-23T12:32:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* 2015 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== MOR Wiki Users Meetings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first general assembly of MOR Wiki users took place on December 10th - 2013, at the [http://mpim.iwww.mpg.de/research/groups/csc MPI in Magdeburg] (Germany).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The second MOR Wiki Meeting took place on April 23rd - 2015, at the [http://mpim.iwww.mpg.de/research/groups/csc MPI in Magdeburg] (Germany).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Upcoming Workhops and Conferences ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.scilab-enterprises.com/company/news/20150511 Doctoral Workshop on Model Reduction in nonlinear dynamics of fluids and structures] January 25th - 29th, 2016; Paris (France)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Symposium &amp;quot;[http://www.humboldt-foundation.de/web/gafos-2016-sessions.html Model Reduction for Complex Systems]&amp;quot; at [http://www.humboldt-foundation.de/web/gafos-2016.html 20th German-American Symposium] March 10th - 13th; Potsdam (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Workshop &amp;quot;[http://www.ians.uni-stuttgart.de/agh/misc/events/morml2016/index.html Data-Driven Model Order Reduction and Machine Learning (MORML 2016)]&amp;quot; March 30th - April 1st; University of Stuttgart (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Minisymposium &amp;quot;Reduced-order modeling in Uncertainty Quantification&amp;quot; at [http://www.siam.org/meetings/uq16/ SIAM Conference on Uncertainty Quantification] April 5th - 8th, 2016; Lausanne (Switzerland)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Minisymposium &amp;quot;Reduced Basis, POD and PGD Model Order Reduction Techniques&amp;quot; at [http://www.eccomas2016.org ECCOMAS Congress 2016] June 5th - 10th, 2016; Crete Island (Greece)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Workshop &amp;quot;[http://www.ihp.fr/en/CEB/T3-2016/workshop2 Recent developments in numerical methods for model reduction]&amp;quot; November 7th - 10th, 2016; Paris (France)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Events ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2015 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://sites.google.com/site/mor4mems2015/ MOR 4 MEMS] November 17th - 18th, 2015; Karlsruhe (Germany). [http://www2.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/mpcsc/events/MOR4MEMS2015/ Here] you find the presentation slides.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://rom2015.sciencesconf.org Reduced Basis, POD and PGD Model Reduction Techniques] November 4th - 6th, 2015; Cachan (France)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://eumornetlux.weebly.com/ Exploratory Workshop on Applications of Model Order Reduction Methods in Industrial Research and Development] November 6th, 2015; Luxembourg (Luxembourg)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://indico.sissa.it/event/4/ MoRePaS III] October 13th - 16th, 2015; Trieste (Italy)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mathos.unios.hr/index.php/351 3rd International School on Model Reduction for Dynamical Control Systems] October 5th - 10th, 2015; Dubrovnik (Croatia)&lt;br /&gt;
* Minisymposium &amp;quot;[http://enumath2015.iam.metu.edu.tr/minisymposia20.html Local and adaptive model reduction for partial differential equations]&amp;quot; at [http://enumath2015.iam.metu.edu.tr ENuMath] September 14th - 18th, 2015; Ankara (Turkey)&lt;br /&gt;
* Minisymposium &amp;quot;[http://scicade2015.math.uni-potsdam.de/scicade2015/minisymposiadetails.html#MS34 Parametric Model Order Reduction: Challenges and Solutions]&amp;quot; at [http://scicade2015.math.uni-potsdam.de SciCADE] September 14th - 18th, 2015; Potsdam (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.math.uni-konstanz.de/numerik/pod/rbss_2015/ Reduced Basis Summer School 2015] September 14th - 18th, 2015; Konstanz (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.cs.cas.cz/more2015/index.php Workshop on MOdel REduction] September 6th - 10th, 2015; Pilsen (Czech Republic)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://modelreduction.net/workshops/5th-annual 5th International Workshop on Model Reduction in Reacting Flows] June 28th - July 1st; Spreewald (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www3.math.tu-berlin.de/numerik/MoRTransPhen/ Model Reduction for Transport Dominated Phenomena] May 19th - 20th; Berlin (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* International Symposium: [http://www.tum-ias.de/bigdata2015/program.html Big Data and Predictive Computational Modelling] May 18th - 21st, 2015; München (Germany) &lt;br /&gt;
* Minisymposium &amp;quot;Adaptive Model Order Reduction&amp;quot; at [http://www.siam.org/meetings/cse15 SIAM Conference on Computational Science and Engineering] March 14th - 18th, 2015; Salt Lake City (USA)&lt;br /&gt;
* Minisymposium &amp;quot;Parametric Model Reduction and Inverse Problems&amp;quot; at [http://www.siam.org/meetings/cse15 SIAM Conference on Computational Science and Engineering] March 14th - 18th, 2015; Salt Lake City (USA)&lt;br /&gt;
* Minisymposium &amp;quot;Recent Advances in Model Reduction&amp;quot; at [http://www.siam.org/meetings/cse15 SIAM Conference on Computational Science and Engineering] March 14th - 18th, 2015; Salt Lake City (USA)&lt;br /&gt;
* Minisymposium &amp;quot;Model Reduction&amp;quot; at [http://www.mathmod.at Vienna Conference on Mathematical Modelling (MathMod)] February 18th - 20th, 2015; Vienna (Austria)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2014 ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mfo.de/occasion/1448b/www_view Oberwolfach Seminar on Projection Based Model Reduction] November 23rd - 29th, 2014; Oberwolfach (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://eu-mor.net EU-MORNET] Kick-Off Meeting September 18th - 19th; Eindhoven (Netherlands)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/mathematics/extranet/conferences/model-reduction-across-disciplines Model reduction across disciplines] August 19th - 22nd, 2014; Leicester (United Kingdom) &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://wwwmath.uni-muenster.de/rbss2014 Reduced Basis Summer School 2014] August 18th - 22nd, 2014; Muenster (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.wccm-eccm-ecfd2014.org/admin/Files/FileAbstract/a69.pdf Advanced Reduced-order Modelling Strategies for Parametrized PDEs and Applications] Minisymposium at the [http://www.wccm-eccm-ecfd2014.org IACM-ECCOMAS 2014] July 20th - 25th, 2014; Barcelona (Spain)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.wccm-eccm-ecfd2014.org/admin/Files/FileAbstract/a239.pdf Model Reduction for Multibody and Nonlinear Dynamics Systems] Minisymposium at the [http://www.wccm-eccm-ecfd2014.org IACM-ECCOMAS 2014] July 20th - 25th, 2014; Barcelona (Spain)&lt;br /&gt;
* Model and Controller Reduction Session at the [http://ecc14.eu European Control Conference 2014] June 24th- 27th, 2014; Strasbourg (France)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://jahrestagung.gamm-ev.de/index.php/scientific-program/minisymposia Parametric Model Reduction of Dynamical Systems] Minisymposium at the [http://jahrestagung.gamm-ev.de/ GAMM annual meeting 2014] March 10th - 14th, 2014; Erlangen (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2013===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www2.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/mpcsc/events/ModRed/2013/ ModRed 2013] December 11th - 13th, 2013; Magdeburg (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mathos.unios.hr/locschool2013/ DAAD International School on Linear Optimal Control of Dynamic Systems] September 23rd - 28th; Osijek (Croatia)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ma.tum.de/IGDK1754/SummerSchool2013 Summerschool &amp;quot;Reduced Basis Methods - Fundamentals and Applications&amp;quot;] September 16th - 19th; Munich (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced Basis Summer School 2013 August, 2013; Aachen (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://enumath2013.epfl.ch Enumath] Minisymposium &amp;quot;Reduced order modelling for the simulation of complex systems&amp;quot; August 26th - 30th, 2013, Lausanne (Switzerland) &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://modredcirm2013.uni-muenster.de/ CIRM workshop Model Reduction and Approximation for Complex Systems] June 10th - 14th, 2013; Marseille (France)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2012===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.morepas.org/workshop2012/index.html MoRePaS 2] October 2nd - 5th, 2012; Günzburg (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mathematik.uni-stuttgart.de/fak8/ians/lehrstuhl/agh/misc/events/rbm_workshop_2012.html Reduced Basis Summer School 2012] August 28th - 31st; Stuttgart (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.math.uni-hamburg.de/moa/ Workshop on Adaptivity and Model Order Reduction in PDE Constrained Optimization] July 23rd - 27th; Hamburg (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2011===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.math.uni-konstanz.de/numerik/pod/workshop Advances in POD and RB Model-Order Reduction] November 21st, 2011; Konstanz (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.uni-ulm.de/mawi/mawi-numerik/aktuelles/summer-school-rbm.html Reduced Basis Summer School 2011] October 25th - 28th; Ulm (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www2.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/mpcsc/events/trogir/ Summer School on Numerical Linear Algebra for Dynamical and High-Dimensional Problems] October 10th - 15th; Trogir (Croatia)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.wias-berlin.de/workshops/MOR2011/ Workshop on Model Order Reduction in Optimization and Control with PDEs] January 26th - 28th; Berlin (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2010===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ians.uni-stuttgart.de/MoRePaS/events/Ulm10/index.html Workshop on RB Methods] December 7th - 8th; Ulm (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www3.math.tu-berlin.de/modred2010/ ModRed 2010] December 2nd - 4th; Berlin (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* Minisymposium [http://www.eccomas-cfd2010.org/minisymposia.php http://www.eccomas-cfd2010.org/minisymposia.php] at [http://www.eccomas-cfd2010.org ECCOMAS CFD]; June 14th - 17th; Lisbon (Portugal)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2009===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.win.tue.nl/casa/meetings/special/mor09/ Autumn School on Future Developments in Model Order Reduction] September 21st - 25th, 2009; Terschelling (Netherlands)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.uni-muenster.de/CeNoS/ocs/index.php/MRP/MRP09/ MoRePaS] September 16th - 18th, 2009 Münster (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2003===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://web.archive.org/web/20070612131401/http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/numerik/mt/NumMat/Meetings/0310_MFO/ Dimensional Reduction of Large-Scale Systems] October 19th - 25th, 2003 Oberwolfach (Germany)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Silicon_Nitride_Membrane&amp;diff=1763</id>
		<title>Silicon Nitride Membrane</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Silicon_Nitride_Membrane&amp;diff=1763"/>
		<updated>2015-07-27T08:08:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Contact */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:parametric 2-5 parameters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;figure id=&amp;quot;fig:tempprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:Fig_1.png|right|frame|&amp;lt;caption&amp;gt;silicon nitride membrane temperature profile&amp;lt;/caption&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/figure&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &#039;&#039;&#039;silicon nitride membrane&#039;&#039;&#039; (SiN membrane) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;T. Bechtold, D. Hohfeld, E. B. Rudnyi and M. Guenther, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/20/4/045030 Efficient extraction of thin-film thermal parameters from numerical models via parametric model order reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, J. Micromech. Microeng. 20(2010) 045030 (13pp).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; can be a part of a gas sensor, but also a part of an infra-red sensor, a michrothruster, an optimical filter etc. This structure resembles&lt;br /&gt;
a microhotplate similar to other micro-fabricated devices&lt;br /&gt;
such as gas sensors &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. Spannhake, O. Schulz, A. Helwig, G. Müller and T. Doll, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2005.1597811 Design, development and operational concept of an advanced MEMS IR source for miniaturized gas sensor systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;,  Proc. Sensors, 762-765, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and infrared sources &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;M. Graf, D. Barrettino, S. Taschini, C. Hagleitner, A. Hierlemann and H. Baltes, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac035432h Metal oxide-based monolithic complementary metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor microsystem]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, Anal. Chem., 76:4437-4445, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. See &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;fig:tempprof&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, the temperature profile for the SiN membrane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The governing heat transfer equation in the membrane is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla \cdot (\kappa \nabla T)+Q - \rho c_p \cdot \frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the thermal conductivity in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-1} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, cp is the specific heat capacity in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; J kg^{-1} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the mass density in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;kg m^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the temperature distribution. We assume a homogeneous heat generation rate over a lumped resistor:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = \frac{u^2(t)}{R(T)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the heat generation rate per unit volume in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
We use the initial condition &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; T_0 = 273K &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the&lt;br /&gt;
Dirichlet boundary condition &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; T = 273 K &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the bottom of&lt;br /&gt;
the computational domain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The convection boundary condition at the top of the membrane is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
q=h(T-T_{air}), &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the heat transfer coefficient between the membrane and the ambient air in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-2} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discretization==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the above convection boundary condition and assuming &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{air}=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, finite element discretization of the heat transfer model leads to the parametrized system as below,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(E_0+\rho c_p \cdot E_1) \dot{T} +(A_0 +\kappa \cdot A_1 +h \cdot A_2)T = B \frac{u^2(t)}{R(T)}, \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y=C T,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where the volumetric heat capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, thermal conductivity&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the heat transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; between the membrane&lt;br /&gt;
are kept as parameters. The volumetric hear capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the product of two independent variables, i.e. the specific hear capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the density &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The range of interest for the four independent variables are respectively &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa \in [2, 5]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c_p \in [400, 750]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho \in [3000,3200]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; h \in [10, 12]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The frequency range is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f \in [0,25]Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
What is of interest is the output in time domain. The interesting time interval is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t \in [0,0.04]s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is either a constant heat resistivity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0(1+\alpha T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which depends linearly on the temperature. Here we use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_0=274.94 \Omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and temperature coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha=2.293 \pm 0.006 \times 10^{-4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The model was created and meshed in ANSYS. It contains a constant load vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; corresponding to the constant input power of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The number of degrees of freedom is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=60,020&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The input function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a step function with the value &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which disappears at the time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.02s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This means between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.02s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; input is one and after that it is zero. However, be aware that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is just a factor with which the load vector B is multiplied and which corresponds to the heating power of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This means if one keeps &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as suggested above, the device is heated with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for the time length of 0.02s and after that the heating is turned off. If for whatever reason, one wants the heating power to be &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;5mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has to be set equal to two, etc...&lt;br /&gt;
When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0(1+\alpha T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, it is a function of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and hence, the system has non-linear input. (It is also called a weakly nonlinear system.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The model is generated in ANSYS. The system matrices are in &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/ MatrixMarket]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; format and can be downloaded here: [[Media: SiN_membrane.tgz|SiN_membrane.tgz]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; [[User:Feng|Lihong Feng]] &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.igs.uni-rostock.de/mitarbeiter/tamara-bechtold/ Tamara Bechtold]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Gas_Sensor&amp;diff=1762</id>
		<title>Gas Sensor</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Gas_Sensor&amp;diff=1762"/>
		<updated>2015-07-27T08:08:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Contact */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ODE]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
This is a non-parametrized first order linear model. The [http://simulation.uni-freiburg.de/downloads/benchmark/Gas%20sensor%20%2838880%29 Gas sensor] (38880)  model is part of the [http://simulation.uni-freiburg.de/downloads/benchmark Oberwolfach Model Reduction Benchmark Collection]. More information can be found in &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;T. Bechtold, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/1914/ Model Order Reduction of Electro-Thermal MEMS]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, PhD thesis, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
All matrices are in the [http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/ Matrix Market] format and can be found at: [http://simulation.uni-freiburg.de/downloads/benchmark/Gas%20sensor%20%2838880%29/files/fileinnercontentproxy.2010-02-09.2469808567 GasSensor.tar.gz].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; [[User:Feng|Lihong Feng]] &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.igs.uni-rostock.de/mitarbeiter/tamara-bechtold/ Tamara Bechtold]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Silicon_Nitride_Membrane&amp;diff=1761</id>
		<title>Silicon Nitride Membrane</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Silicon_Nitride_Membrane&amp;diff=1761"/>
		<updated>2015-07-27T08:08:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Contact */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:parametric 2-5 parameters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;figure id=&amp;quot;fig:tempprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:Fig_1.png|right|frame|&amp;lt;caption&amp;gt;silicon nitride membrane temperature profile&amp;lt;/caption&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/figure&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &#039;&#039;&#039;silicon nitride membrane&#039;&#039;&#039; (SiN membrane) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;T. Bechtold, D. Hohfeld, E. B. Rudnyi and M. Guenther, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/20/4/045030 Efficient extraction of thin-film thermal parameters from numerical models via parametric model order reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, J. Micromech. Microeng. 20(2010) 045030 (13pp).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; can be a part of a gas sensor, but also a part of an infra-red sensor, a michrothruster, an optimical filter etc. This structure resembles&lt;br /&gt;
a microhotplate similar to other micro-fabricated devices&lt;br /&gt;
such as gas sensors &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. Spannhake, O. Schulz, A. Helwig, G. Müller and T. Doll, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2005.1597811 Design, development and operational concept of an advanced MEMS IR source for miniaturized gas sensor systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;,  Proc. Sensors, 762-765, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and infrared sources &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;M. Graf, D. Barrettino, S. Taschini, C. Hagleitner, A. Hierlemann and H. Baltes, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac035432h Metal oxide-based monolithic complementary metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor microsystem]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, Anal. Chem., 76:4437-4445, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. See &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;fig:tempprof&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, the temperature profile for the SiN membrane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The governing heat transfer equation in the membrane is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla \cdot (\kappa \nabla T)+Q - \rho c_p \cdot \frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the thermal conductivity in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-1} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, cp is the specific heat capacity in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; J kg^{-1} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the mass density in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;kg m^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the temperature distribution. We assume a homogeneous heat generation rate over a lumped resistor:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = \frac{u^2(t)}{R(T)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the heat generation rate per unit volume in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
We use the initial condition &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; T_0 = 273K &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the&lt;br /&gt;
Dirichlet boundary condition &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; T = 273 K &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the bottom of&lt;br /&gt;
the computational domain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The convection boundary condition at the top of the membrane is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
q=h(T-T_{air}), &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the heat transfer coefficient between the membrane and the ambient air in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-2} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discretization==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the above convection boundary condition and assuming &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{air}=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, finite element discretization of the heat transfer model leads to the parametrized system as below,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(E_0+\rho c_p \cdot E_1) \dot{T} +(A_0 +\kappa \cdot A_1 +h \cdot A_2)T = B \frac{u^2(t)}{R(T)}, \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y=C T,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where the volumetric heat capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, thermal conductivity&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the heat transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; between the membrane&lt;br /&gt;
are kept as parameters. The volumetric hear capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the product of two independent variables, i.e. the specific hear capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the density &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The range of interest for the four independent variables are respectively &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa \in [2, 5]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c_p \in [400, 750]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho \in [3000,3200]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; h \in [10, 12]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The frequency range is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f \in [0,25]Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
What is of interest is the output in time domain. The interesting time interval is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t \in [0,0.04]s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is either a constant heat resistivity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0(1+\alpha T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which depends linearly on the temperature. Here we use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_0=274.94 \Omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and temperature coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha=2.293 \pm 0.006 \times 10^{-4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The model was created and meshed in ANSYS. It contains a constant load vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; corresponding to the constant input power of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The number of degrees of freedom is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=60,020&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The input function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a step function with the value &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which disappears at the time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.02s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This means between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.02s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; input is one and after that it is zero. However, be aware that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is just a factor with which the load vector B is multiplied and which corresponds to the heating power of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This means if one keeps &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as suggested above, the device is heated with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for the time length of 0.02s and after that the heating is turned off. If for whatever reason, one wants the heating power to be &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;5mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has to be set equal to two, etc...&lt;br /&gt;
When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0(1+\alpha T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, it is a function of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and hence, the system has non-linear input. (It is also called a weakly nonlinear system.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The model is generated in ANSYS. The system matrices are in &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/ MatrixMarket]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; format and can be downloaded here: [[Media: SiN_membrane.tgz|SiN_membrane.tgz]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; [[User:Feng|Lihong Feng]] &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.igs.uni-rostock.de/mitarbeiter/tamara-bechtold/ Tamara Bechtold]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Gas_Sensor&amp;diff=1760</id>
		<title>Gas Sensor</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Gas_Sensor&amp;diff=1760"/>
		<updated>2015-07-27T08:06:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Contact */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ODE]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
This is a non-parametrized first order linear model. The [http://simulation.uni-freiburg.de/downloads/benchmark/Gas%20sensor%20%2838880%29 Gas sensor] (38880)  model is part of the [http://simulation.uni-freiburg.de/downloads/benchmark Oberwolfach Model Reduction Benchmark Collection]. More information can be found in &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;T. Bechtold, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/1914/ Model Order Reduction of Electro-Thermal MEMS]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, PhD thesis, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
All matrices are in the [http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/ Matrix Market] format and can be found at: [http://simulation.uni-freiburg.de/downloads/benchmark/Gas%20sensor%20%2838880%29/files/fileinnercontentproxy.2010-02-09.2469808567 GasSensor.tar.gz].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; [[User:Feng|Lihong Feng]] &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tamara Bechtold (http://www.igs.uni-rostock.de/mitarbeiter/tamara-bechtold/)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1613</id>
		<title>Projection based MOR</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1613"/>
		<updated>2013-12-11T08:54:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
Consider the linear time invariant system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E \frac{dx(t)}{dt}=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t),    \quad \quad (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as an example. &lt;br /&gt;
All the existing model order reduction ([[List_of_abbreviations#MOR|MOR]]) methods are based on projection&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Antoulas, A. C. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718713 Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Vol. 6. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp.376--377, 2009; ISBN 978-0-89871-529-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
That is to find a subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which approximates the manifold where the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; resides. &lt;br /&gt;
Afterwards, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is approximated by its projection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
The reduced model is produced by [[Petrov-Galerkin projection]] using a test subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or by [[Galerkin projection]] using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as the test subspace. &lt;br /&gt;
Assuming that an orthonormal basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V=(v_1,v_2, \ldots, v_q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has been found, then the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be represented by the basis as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{x} (t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be approximated by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x(t) \approx V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q \ll n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is computed, an approximate solution &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
The vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be computed from the reduced model, derived by the following two steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 1. By replacing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (1) with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Vz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}=A Vz+Bu(t)+e,\quad \hat y(t)=CV z.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 2. The residual is denoted as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=AVz+Bu(t)-E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Forcing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in a properly chosen subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb {R}^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; leads to the Petrov-Galerkin projection: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^T e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the columns of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the basis of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Then we have,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^TE \frac{d{V z}}{t}=W^TA Vz +W^T B u(t), \quad \hat{y}(t)=CVz.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E}=W^TEV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat {A}=W^TAV, \hat{B}=W^TB&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{C}=CV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get the final reduced model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E} \frac{dz(t)}{dt}=\hat{A}z(t)+\hat{B}u(t), \quad &lt;br /&gt;
\hat{y}(t)=\hat{C}z(t).    \quad \quad (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)=Vz(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  can be obtained from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by solving the system in (2). &lt;br /&gt;
The system in (2) is much smaller than the system in (1) in the sense that there are many less equations in (2) than in (1). &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the system in (2) is much easier to be solved, which is the so-called reduced model. &lt;br /&gt;
In order to save the simulation time of solving (1), the reduced model can be used to replace (1) to attain a fast simulation. Furthermore, the error between the two systems should be within acceptable tolerance. &lt;br /&gt;
The error can be measured through the error between the the state vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t), \hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the output responses &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t), \hat y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the transfer functions of the two systems.&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that once the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; have been computed, the reduced model is obtained. &lt;br /&gt;
While the Gramian based MOR methods (e.g. [[Balanced Truncation]]) usually compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; different from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, some methods use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, e.g. some of the [[Moment-matching method]]s, the [[Reduced Basis PMOR method]]s, and some of the [[POD method]]s etc.. When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Petrov-Galerkin projection becomes Galerkin projection. &lt;br /&gt;
MOR methods differ in the computation of the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Gramian based MOR methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by the controllability and observability Gramians. &lt;br /&gt;
Reduced basis methods and [[List_of_abbreviations#POD|POD]] methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the snapshots of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at different time steps (also at the samples of the parameters if the system is parametric). The methods based on moment-matching compute :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the moments of the transfer function. &lt;br /&gt;
In eigenvalue based MOR methods, e.g. [[Modal truncation]], the columns of :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are eigenvectors or invariant subspaces corresponding to selected eigenvalues of the matrix pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One common goal of all MOR methods is that the behavior of the reduced model should be sufficiently &amp;quot;close&amp;quot; to that of the original model guaranteed through the above mentioned error measurements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1612</id>
		<title>Projection based MOR</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1612"/>
		<updated>2013-12-11T08:53:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
Consider the linear time invariant system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E \frac{dx(t)}{dt}=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t),    \quad \quad (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as an example. &lt;br /&gt;
All the existing model order reduction ([[List_of_abbreviations#MOR|MOR]]) methods are based on projection&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Antoulas, A. C. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718713 Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Vol. 6. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp.376--377, 2009; ISBN 978-0-89871-529-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
That is to find a subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which approximates the manifold where the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; resides. &lt;br /&gt;
Afterwards, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is approximated by its projection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
The reduced model is produced by [[Petrov-Galerkin projection]] using a test subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or by [[Galerkin projection]] using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as the test subspace. &lt;br /&gt;
Assuming that an orthonormal basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V=(v_1,v_2, \ldots, v_q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has been found, then the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be represented by the basis as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{x} (t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be approximated by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x(t) \approx V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q \ll n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is computed, an approximate solution &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
The vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be computed from the reduced model which is  derived by the following two steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 1. By replacing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (1) with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Vz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}=A Vz+Bu(t)+e,\quad \hat y(t)=CV z.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 2. The residual is denoted as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=AVz+Bu(t)-E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Forcing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in a properly chosen subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb {R}^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; leads to the Petrov-Galerkin projection: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^T e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the columns of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the basis of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Then we have,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^TE \frac{d{V z}}{t}=W^TA Vz +W^T B u(t), \quad \hat{y}(t)=CVz.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E}=W^TEV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat {A}=W^TAV, \hat{B}=W^TB&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{C}=CV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get the final reduced model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E} \frac{dz(t)}{dt}=\hat{A}z(t)+\hat{B}u(t), \quad &lt;br /&gt;
\hat{y}(t)=\hat{C}z(t).    \quad \quad (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)=Vz(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  can be obtained from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by solving the system in (2). &lt;br /&gt;
The system in (2) is much smaller than the system in (1) in the sense that there are many less equations in (2) than in (1). &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the system in (2) is much easier to be solved, which is the so-called reduced model. &lt;br /&gt;
In order to save the simulation time of solving (1), the reduced model can be used to replace (1) to attain a fast simulation. Furthermore, the error between the two systems should be within acceptable tolerance. &lt;br /&gt;
The error can be measured through the error between the the state vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t), \hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the output responses &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t), \hat y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the transfer functions of the two systems.&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that once the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; have been computed, the reduced model is obtained. &lt;br /&gt;
While the Gramian based MOR methods (e.g. [[Balanced Truncation]]) usually compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; different from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, some methods use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, e.g. some of the [[Moment-matching method]]s, the [[Reduced Basis PMOR method]]s, and some of the [[POD method]]s etc.. When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Petrov-Galerkin projection becomes Galerkin projection. &lt;br /&gt;
MOR methods differ in the computation of the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Gramian based MOR methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by the controllability and observability Gramians. &lt;br /&gt;
Reduced basis methods and [[List_of_abbreviations#POD|POD]] methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the snapshots of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at different time steps (also at the samples of the parameters if the system is parametric). The methods based on moment-matching compute :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the moments of the transfer function. &lt;br /&gt;
In eigenvalue based MOR methods, e.g. [[Modal truncation]], the columns of :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are eigenvectors or invariant subspaces corresponding to selected eigenvalues of the matrix pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One common goal of all MOR methods is that the behavior of the reduced model should be sufficiently &amp;quot;close&amp;quot; to that of the original model guaranteed through the above mentioned error measurements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1611</id>
		<title>Projection based MOR</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1611"/>
		<updated>2013-12-11T08:52:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
Consider the linear time invariant system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E \frac{dx(t)}{dt}=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t),    \quad \quad (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as an example. &lt;br /&gt;
All the existing model order reduction ([[List_of_abbreviations#MOR|MOR]]) methods are based on projection&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Antoulas, A. C. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718713 Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Vol. 6. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp.376--377, 2009; ISBN 978-0-89871-529-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
That is to find a subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which approximates the manifold where the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; resides. &lt;br /&gt;
Afterwards, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is approximated by its projection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
The reduced model is produced by [[Petrov-Galerkin projection]] using a test subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or by [[Galerkin projection]] using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as the test subspace. &lt;br /&gt;
Assuming that an orthonormal basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V=(v_1,v_2, \ldots, v_q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has been found, then the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be represented by the basis as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{x} (t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be approximated by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x(t) \approx V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q \ll n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is computed, an approximate solution &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
The vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be computed from the reduced model which is  derived by the following two steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 1. By replacing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (1) with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Vz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}=A Vz+Bu(t)+e,\quad \hat y(t)=CV z.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 2. The residual is denoted as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=AVz+Bu(t)-E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Forcing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in a properly chosen subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb {R}^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; leads to the Petrov-Galerkin projection: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^T e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the columns of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the basis of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Then we have,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^TE \frac{d{V z}}{t}=W^TA Vz +W^T B u(t), \quad \hat{y}(t)=CVz.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E}=W^TEV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat {A}=W^TAV, \hat{B}=W^TB&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{C}=CV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get the final reduced model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E} \frac{dz(t)}{dt}=\hat{A}z(t)+\hat{B}u(t), \quad &lt;br /&gt;
\hat{y}(t)=\hat{C}z(t).    \quad \quad (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)=Vz(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  can be obtained from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by solving the system in (2). &lt;br /&gt;
The system in (2) is much smaller than the system in (1) in the sense that there are many less equations in (2) than in (1). &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the system in (2) is much easier to be solved, which is the so-called reduced model. &lt;br /&gt;
In order to save the simulation time of solving (1), the reduced model can be used to replace (1) to attain a fast simulation. Furthermore, the error between the two systems should be within acceptable tolerance. &lt;br /&gt;
The error can be measured through the error between the the state vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t), \hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the output responses &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t), \hat y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the transfer functions of the two systems.&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that once the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; have been computed, the reduced model is obtained. &lt;br /&gt;
While the Gramian based MOR methods (e.g. [[Balanced Truncation]]) usually compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; different from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, some methods use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, e.g. some of the [[Moment-matching method]]s, the [[Reduced Basis PMOR method]]s, and some of the [[POD method]]s etc.. When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Petrov-Galerkin projection becomes Galerkin projection. &lt;br /&gt;
MOR methods differ in the computation of the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Gramian based MOR methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by the controllability and observability Gramians. &lt;br /&gt;
Reduced basis methods and [[List_of_abbreviations#POD|POD]] methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the snapshots of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at different time steps (also at the samples of the parameters if the system is parametric). The methods based on moment-matching compute :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the moments of the transfer function. &lt;br /&gt;
In eigenvalue based MOR methods, e.g. [[Modal truncation]], the columns of :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are eigenvectors or invariant subspaces corresponding to selected eigenvalues of the matrix pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One common goal of all MOR methods is that the behavior of the reduced model should be sufficiently &amp;quot;close&amp;quot; to that of the original model guaranteed through the above mentioned error measurements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1610</id>
		<title>Projection based MOR</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1610"/>
		<updated>2013-12-11T08:50:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
Consider the linear time invariant system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E \frac{dx(t)}{dt}=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t),    \quad \quad (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as an example. &lt;br /&gt;
All the existing model order reduction ([[List_of_abbreviations#MOR|MOR]]) methods are based on projection&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Antoulas, A. C. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718713 Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Vol. 6. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp.376--377, 2009; ISBN 978-0-89871-529-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
That is to find a subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which approximates the manifold where the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; resides. &lt;br /&gt;
Afterwards, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is approximated by its projection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
The reduced model is produced by [[Petrov-Galerkin projection]] using a test subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or by [[Galerkin projection]] using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as the test subspace. &lt;br /&gt;
Assuming that an orthonormal basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V=(v_1,v_2, \ldots, v_q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has been found, then the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be represented by the basis as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde{x} (t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be approximated by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x(t) \approx V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q \ll n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is computed, an approximate solution &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
The vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be computed from the reduced model which is  derived by the following two steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 1. By replacing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (1) with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Vz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}=A Vz+Bu(t)+e,\quad \hat y(t)=CV z.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 2. The residual is denoted as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=AVz+Bu(t)-E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Forcing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in a properly chosen subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb {R}^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; leads to the Petrov-Galerkin projection: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^T e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the columns of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the basis of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Then we have,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^TE \frac{d{V z}}{t}=W^TA Vz +W^T B u(t), \quad \hat{y}(t)=CVz.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E}=W^TEV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat {A}=W^TAV, \hat{B}=W^TB&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{C}=CV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get the final reduced model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E} \frac{dz(t)}{dt}=\hat{A}z(t)+\hat{B}u(t), \quad &lt;br /&gt;
\hat{y}(t)=\hat{C}z(t).    \quad \quad (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)=Vz(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  can be obtained from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by solving the system in (2). &lt;br /&gt;
The system in (2) is much smaller than the system in (1) in the sense that there are many less equations in (2) than in (1). &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the system in (2) is much easier to be solved, which is the so-called reduced model. &lt;br /&gt;
In order to save the simulation time of solving (1), the reduced model can be used to replace (1) to attain a fast simulation. Furthermore, the error between the two systems should be within acceptable tolerance. &lt;br /&gt;
The error can be measured through the error between the the state vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t), \hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the output responses &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t), \hat y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the transfer functions of the two systems.&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that once the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; have been computed, the reduced model is obtained. &lt;br /&gt;
While the Gramian based MOR methods (e.g. [[Balanced Truncation]]) usually compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; different from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, some methods use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, e.g. some of the [[Moment-matching method]]s, the [[Reduced Basis PMOR method]]s, and some of the [[POD method]]s etc.. When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Petrov-Galerkin projection becomes Galerkin projection. &lt;br /&gt;
MOR methods differ in the computation of the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Gramian based MOR methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by the controllability and observability Gramians. &lt;br /&gt;
Reduced basis methods and [[List_of_abbreviations#POD|POD]] methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the snapshots of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at different time steps (also at the samples of the parameters if the system is parametric). The methods based on moment-matching compute :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the moments of the transfer function. &lt;br /&gt;
In eigenvalue based MOR methods, e.g. [[Modal truncation]], the columns of :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are eigenvectors or invariant subspaces corresponding to selected eigenvalues of the matrix pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One common goal of all MOR methods is that the behavior of the reduced model should be sufficiently &amp;quot;close&amp;quot; to that of the original model guaranteed through the above mentioned error measurements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1609</id>
		<title>Projection based MOR</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1609"/>
		<updated>2013-12-11T08:49:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
Consider the linear time invariant system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E \frac{dx(t)}{dt}=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t),    \quad \quad (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as an example. &lt;br /&gt;
All the existing model order reduction ([[List_of_abbreviations#MOR|MOR]]) methods are based on projection&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Antoulas, A. C. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718713 Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Vol. 6. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp.376--377, 2009; ISBN 978-0-89871-529-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
That is to find a subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which approximates the manifold where the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; resides. &lt;br /&gt;
Afterwards, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is approximated by its projection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
The reduced model is produced by [[Petrov-Galerkin projection]] using a test subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or by [[Galerkin projection]] using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as the test subspace. &lt;br /&gt;
Assuming that an orthonormal basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V=(v_1,v_2, \ldots, v_q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has been found, then the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be represented by the basis as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde{x} (t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be approximated by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x(t) \approx V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q \ll n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is computed, an approximate solution &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
The vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be computed from the reduced model which is  derived by the following two steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 1. By replacing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (1) with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Vz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}=A Vz+Bu(t)+e,\quad \hat y(t)=CV z.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 2. The residual is denoted as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=AVz+Bu(t)-E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Forcing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in a properly chosen subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb {R}^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; leads to the Petrov-Galerkin projection: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^T e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the columns of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the basis of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Then we have,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^TE \frac{d{V z}}{t}=W^TA Vz +W^T B u(t), \quad \hat{y}(t)=CVz.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E}=W^TEV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat {A}=W^TAV, \hat{B}=W^TB&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{C}=CV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get the final reduced model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E} \frac{dz(t)}{dt}=\hat{A}z(t)+\hat{B}u(t), \quad &lt;br /&gt;
\hat{y}(t)=\hat{C}z(t).    \quad \quad (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)=Vz(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  can be obtained from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by solving the system in (2). &lt;br /&gt;
The system in (2) is much smaller than the system in (1) in the sense that there are many less equations in (2) than in (1). &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the system in (2) is much easier to be solved, which is the so-called reduced model. &lt;br /&gt;
In order to save the simulation time of solving (1), the reduced model can be used to replace (1) to attain a fast simulation. Furthermore, the error between the two systems should be within acceptable tolerance. &lt;br /&gt;
The error can be measured through the error between the the state vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t), \hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the output responses &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t), \hat y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the transfer functions of the two systems.&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that once the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; have been computed, the reduced model is obtained. &lt;br /&gt;
While the Gramian based MOR methods (e.g. [[Balanced Truncation]]) usually compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; different from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, some methods use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, e.g. some of the [[Moment-matching method]]s, the [[Reduced Basis PMOR method]]s, and some of the [[POD method]]s etc.. When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Petrov-Galerkin projection becomes Galerkin projection. &lt;br /&gt;
MOR methods differ in the computation of the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Gramian based MOR methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by the controllability and observability Gramians. &lt;br /&gt;
Reduced basis methods and [[List_of_abbreviations#POD|POD]] methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the snapshots of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at different time steps (also at the samples of the parameters if the system is parametric). The methods based on moment-matching compute :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the moments of the transfer function. &lt;br /&gt;
In eigenvalue based MOR methods, e.g. [[Modal truncation]], the columns of :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are eigenvectors or invariant subspaces corresponding to selected eigenvalues of the matrix pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One common goal of all MOR methods is that the behavior of the reduced model should be sufficiently &amp;quot;close&amp;quot; to that of the original model guaranteed through the above mentioned error measurements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1608</id>
		<title>Projection based MOR</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1608"/>
		<updated>2013-12-11T08:45:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
Consider the linear time invariant system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E \frac{dx(t)}{dt}=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t),    \quad \quad (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as an example. &lt;br /&gt;
All the existing model order reduction ([[List_of_abbreviations#MOR|MOR]]) methods are based on projection&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Antoulas, A. C. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718713 Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Vol. 6. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp.376--377, 2009; ISBN 978-0-89871-529-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
That is to find a subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which approximates the manifold where the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; resides. &lt;br /&gt;
Afterwards, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is approximated by its projection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
The reduced model is produced by [[Petrov-Galerkin projection]] using a test subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or by [[Galerkin projection]] using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as the test subspace. &lt;br /&gt;
Assuming that an orthonormal basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V=(v_1,v_2, \ldots, v_q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has been found, then the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be represented by the basis as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde{x} (t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be approximated by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x(t) \approx V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q \ll n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is computed, an approximate solution &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
The vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be computed from the reduced model which is  derived by the following two steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 1. By replacing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (1) with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Vz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt} \approx A Vz+Bu(t),\quad y(t) \approx CV z.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 2. The residual is denoted as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=AVz+Bu(t)-E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Forcing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in a properly chosen subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb {R}^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; leads to the Petrov-Galerkin projection: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^T e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the columns of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the basis of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Then we have,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^TE \frac{d{V z}}{t}=W^TA Vz +W^T B u(t), \quad \hat{y}(t)=CVz.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E}=W^TEV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat {A}=W^TAV, \hat{B}=W^TB&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{C}=CV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get the final reduced model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E} \frac{dz(t)}{dt}=\hat{A}z(t)+\hat{B}u(t), \quad &lt;br /&gt;
\hat{y}(t)=\hat{C}z(t).    \quad \quad (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)=Vz(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  can be obtained from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by solving the system in (2). &lt;br /&gt;
The system in (2) is much smaller than the system in (1) in the sense that there are many less equations in (2) than in (1). &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the system in (2) is much easier to be solved, which is the so-called reduced model. &lt;br /&gt;
In order to save the simulation time of solving (1), the reduced model can be used to replace (1) to attain a fast simulation. Furthermore, the error between the two systems should be within acceptable tolerance. &lt;br /&gt;
The error can be measured through the error between the the state vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t), \hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the output responses &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t), \hat y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the transfer functions of the two systems.&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that once the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; have been computed, the reduced model is obtained. &lt;br /&gt;
While the Gramian based MOR methods (e.g. [[Balanced Truncation]]) usually compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; different from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, some methods use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, e.g. some of the [[Moment-matching method]]s, the [[Reduced Basis PMOR method]]s, and some of the [[POD method]]s etc.. When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Petrov-Galerkin projection becomes Galerkin projection. &lt;br /&gt;
MOR methods differ in the computation of the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Gramian based MOR methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by the controllability and observability Gramians. &lt;br /&gt;
Reduced basis methods and [[List_of_abbreviations#POD|POD]] methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the snapshots of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at different time steps (also at the samples of the parameters if the system is parametric). The methods based on moment-matching compute :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the moments of the transfer function. &lt;br /&gt;
In eigenvalue based MOR methods, e.g. [[Modal truncation]], the columns of :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are eigenvectors or invariant subspaces corresponding to selected eigenvalues of the matrix pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One common goal of all MOR methods is that the behavior of the reduced model should be sufficiently &amp;quot;close&amp;quot; to that of the original model guaranteed through the above mentioned error measurements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1607</id>
		<title>Projection based MOR</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1607"/>
		<updated>2013-12-11T08:44:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
Consider the linear time invariant system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E \frac{dx(t)}{dt}=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t),    \quad \quad (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as an example. &lt;br /&gt;
All the existing model order reduction ([[List_of_abbreviations#MOR|MOR]]) methods are based on projection&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Antoulas, A. C. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718713 Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Vol. 6. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp.376--377, 2009; ISBN 978-0-89871-529-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
That is to find a subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which approximates the manifold where the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; resides. &lt;br /&gt;
Afterwards, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is approximated by its projection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
The reduced model is produced by [[Petrov-Galerkin projection]] using a test subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or by [[Galerkin projection]] using the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as the test subspace. &lt;br /&gt;
Assuming that an orthonormal basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V=(v_1,v_2, \ldots, v_q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has been found, then the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be represented by the basis as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde{x} (t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be approximated by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x(t) \approx V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q \ll n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is computed, an approximate solution &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
The vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be computed from the reduced model which is  derived by the following two steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 1. By replacing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (1) with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Vz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt} \approx A Vz+Bu(t),\quad y(t) \approx CV z.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 2. The residual is denoted as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=AVz+Bu(t)-E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Forcing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in a properly chosen subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb {R}^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; leads to the Petrov-Galerkin projection: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^T e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the columns of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the basis of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Then we have,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^TE \frac{d{V z}}{t}=W^TA Vz +W^T B u(t), \quad \hat{y}(t)=CVz.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E}=W^TEV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat {A}=W^TAV, \hat{B}=W^TB&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{C}=CV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get the final reduced model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E} \frac{dz(t)}{dt}=\hat{A}z(t)+\hat{B}u(t), \quad &lt;br /&gt;
\hat{y}(t)=\hat{C}z(t).    \quad \quad (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)=Vz(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  can be obtained from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by solving the system in (2). &lt;br /&gt;
The system in (2) is much smaller than the system in (1) in the sense that there are many less equations in (2) than in (1). &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the system in (2) is much easier to be solved, which is the so-called reduced model. &lt;br /&gt;
In order to save the simulation time of solving (1), the reduced model can be used to replace (1) to attain a fast simulation. Furthermore, the error between the two systems should be within acceptable tolerance. &lt;br /&gt;
The error can be measured through the error between the the state vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t), \hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the output responses &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t), \hat y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the transfer functions of the two systems.&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that once the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; have been computed, the reduced model is obtained. &lt;br /&gt;
While the Gramian based MOR methods (e.g. [[Balanced Truncation]]) usually compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; different from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, some methods use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, e.g. some of the [[Moment-matching method]]s, the [[Reduced Basis PMOR method]]s, and some of the [[POD method]]s etc.. When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Petrov-Galerkin projection becomes Galerkin projection. &lt;br /&gt;
MOR methods differ in the computation of the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Gramian based MOR methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by the controllability and observability Gramians. &lt;br /&gt;
Reduced basis methods and [[List_of_abbreviations#POD|POD]] methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the snapshots of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at different time steps (also at the samples of the parameters if the system is parametric). The methods based on moment-matching compute :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the moments of the transfer function. &lt;br /&gt;
In eigenvalue based MOR methods, e.g. [[Modal truncation]], the columns of :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are eigenvectors or invariant subspaces corresponding to selected eigenvalues of the matrix pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One common goal of all MOR methods is that the behavior of the reduced model should be sufficiently &amp;quot;close&amp;quot; to that of the original model guaranteed through the above mentioned error measurements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1606</id>
		<title>Projection based MOR</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1606"/>
		<updated>2013-12-11T08:44:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
Consider the linear time invariant system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E \frac{dx(t)}{dt}=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t),    \quad \quad (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as an example. &lt;br /&gt;
All the existing model order reduction ([[List_of_abbreviations#MOR|MOR]]) methods are based on projection&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Antoulas, A. C. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718713 Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Vol. 6. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp.376--377, 2009; ISBN 978-0-89871-529-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
That is to find a subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which approximates the manifold where the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; resides. &lt;br /&gt;
Afterwards, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is approximated its projection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
The reduced model is produced by [[Petrov-Galerkin projection]] using a test subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or by [[Galerkin projection]] using the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as the test subspace. &lt;br /&gt;
Assuming that an orthonormal basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V=(v_1,v_2, \ldots, v_q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has been found, then the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be represented by the basis as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde{x} (t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be approximated by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x(t) \approx V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q \ll n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is computed, an approximate solution &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
The vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be computed from the reduced model which is  derived by the following two steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 1. By replacing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (1) with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Vz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt} \approx A Vz+Bu(t),\quad y(t) \approx CV z.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 2. The residual is denoted as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=AVz+Bu(t)-E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Forcing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in a properly chosen subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb {R}^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; leads to the Petrov-Galerkin projection: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^T e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the columns of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the basis of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Then we have,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^TE \frac{d{V z}}{t}=W^TA Vz +W^T B u(t), \quad \hat{y}(t)=CVz.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E}=W^TEV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat {A}=W^TAV, \hat{B}=W^TB&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{C}=CV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get the final reduced model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E} \frac{dz(t)}{dt}=\hat{A}z(t)+\hat{B}u(t), \quad &lt;br /&gt;
\hat{y}(t)=\hat{C}z(t).    \quad \quad (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)=Vz(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  can be obtained from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by solving the system in (2). &lt;br /&gt;
The system in (2) is much smaller than the system in (1) in the sense that there are many less equations in (2) than in (1). &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the system in (2) is much easier to be solved, which is the so-called reduced model. &lt;br /&gt;
In order to save the simulation time of solving (1), the reduced model can be used to replace (1) to attain a fast simulation. Furthermore, the error between the two systems should be within acceptable tolerance. &lt;br /&gt;
The error can be measured through the error between the the state vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t), \hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the output responses &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t), \hat y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the transfer functions of the two systems.&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that once the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; have been computed, the reduced model is obtained. &lt;br /&gt;
While the Gramian based MOR methods (e.g. [[Balanced Truncation]]) usually compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; different from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, some methods use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, e.g. some of the [[Moment-matching method]]s, the [[Reduced Basis PMOR method]]s, and some of the [[POD method]]s etc.. When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Petrov-Galerkin projection becomes Galerkin projection. &lt;br /&gt;
MOR methods differ in the computation of the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Gramian based MOR methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by the controllability and observability Gramians. &lt;br /&gt;
Reduced basis methods and [[List_of_abbreviations#POD|POD]] methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the snapshots of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at different time steps (also at the samples of the parameters if the system is parametric). The methods based on moment-matching compute :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the moments of the transfer function. &lt;br /&gt;
In eigenvalue based MOR methods, e.g. [[Modal truncation]], the columns of :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are eigenvectors or invariant subspaces corresponding to selected eigenvalues of the matrix pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One common goal of all MOR methods is that the behavior of the reduced model should be sufficiently &amp;quot;close&amp;quot; to that of the original model guaranteed through the above mentioned error measurements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1605</id>
		<title>Projection based MOR</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Projection_based_MOR&amp;diff=1605"/>
		<updated>2013-12-11T08:36:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
Consider the linear time invariant system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E \frac{dx(t)}{dt}=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t),    \quad \quad (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as an example. &lt;br /&gt;
All the existing model order reduction ([[List_of_abbreviations#MOR|MOR]]) methods are based on projection&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Antoulas, A. C. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718713 Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Vol. 6. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp.376--377, 2009; ISBN 978-0-89871-529-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
That is to find a subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which approximates the manifold where the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; resides. &lt;br /&gt;
Afterwards, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is approximated by a vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
The reduced model is produced by [[Petrov-Galerkin projection]] onto a subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or by [[Galerkin projection]] onto the same subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Assuming that an orthonormal basis &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V=(v_1,v_2, \ldots, v_q)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has been found, then the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be represented by the basis as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde{x} (t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be approximated by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x(t) \approx V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;q \ll n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is computed, an approximate solution &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde x(t)=V z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be obtained.&lt;br /&gt;
The vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be computed from the reduced model which is  derived by the following two steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 1. By replacing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (1) with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Vz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt} \approx A Vz+Bu(t),\quad y(t) \approx CV z.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Step 2. The residual is denoted as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=AVz+Bu(t)-E \frac{d{Vz}}{dt}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Forcing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in a properly chosen subspace &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb {R}^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; leads to the Petrov-Galerkin projection: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^T e=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the columns of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the basis of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
Then we have,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^TE \frac{d{V z}}{t}=W^TA Vz +W^T B u(t), \quad \hat{y}(t)=CVz.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E}=W^TEV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat {A}=W^TAV, \hat{B}=W^TB&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{C}=CV&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get the final reduced model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat{E} \frac{dz(t)}{dt}=\hat{A}z(t)+\hat{B}u(t), \quad &lt;br /&gt;
\hat{y}(t)=\hat{C}z(t).    \quad \quad (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that the approximation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat x(t)=Vz(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  can be obtained from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by solving the system in (2). &lt;br /&gt;
The system in (2) is much smaller than the system in (1) in the sense that there are many less equations in (2) than in (1). &lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the system in (2) is much easier to be solved, which is the so-called reduced model. &lt;br /&gt;
In order to save the simulation time of solving (1), the reduced model can be used to replace (1) to attain a fast simulation. Furthermore, the error between the two systems should be within acceptable tolerance. &lt;br /&gt;
The error can be measured through the error between the the state vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t), \hat x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the output responses &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t), \hat y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or between the transfer functions of the two systems.&lt;br /&gt;
It can be seen that once the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; have been computed, the reduced model is obtained. &lt;br /&gt;
While the Gramian based MOR methods (e.g. [[Balanced Truncation]]) usually compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; different from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, some methods use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, e.g. some of the [[Moment-matching method]]s, the [[Reduced Basis PMOR method]]s, and some of the [[POD method]]s etc.. When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W=V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Petrov-Galerkin projection becomes Galerkin projection. &lt;br /&gt;
MOR methods differ in the computation of the two matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Gramian based MOR methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by the controllability and observability Gramians. &lt;br /&gt;
Reduced basis methods and [[List_of_abbreviations#POD|POD]] methods compute &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the snapshots of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at different time steps (also at the samples of the parameters if the system is parametric). The methods based on moment-matching compute :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the moments of the transfer function. &lt;br /&gt;
In eigenvalue based MOR methods, e.g. [[Modal truncation]], the columns of :&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are eigenvectors or invariant subspaces corresponding to selected eigenvalues of the matrix pair &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One common goal of all MOR methods is that the behavior of the reduced model should be sufficiently &amp;quot;close&amp;quot; to that of the original model guaranteed through the above mentioned error measurements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Silicon_Nitride_Membrane&amp;diff=1602</id>
		<title>Silicon Nitride Membrane</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Silicon_Nitride_Membrane&amp;diff=1602"/>
		<updated>2013-11-27T10:05:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Discretization */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:parametric 2-5 parameters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;figure id=&amp;quot;fig:tempprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:Fig_1.png|right|frame|&amp;lt;caption&amp;gt;silicon nitride membrane temperature profile&amp;lt;/caption&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/figure&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &#039;&#039;&#039;silicon nitride membrane&#039;&#039;&#039; (SiN membrane) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;T. Bechtold, D. Hohfeld, E. B. Rudnyi and M. Guenther, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/20/4/045030 Efficient extraction of thin-film thermal parameters from numerical models via parametric model order reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, J. Micromech. Microeng. 20(2010) 045030 (13pp).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; can be a part of a gas sensor, but also a part of an infra-red sensor, a michrothruster, an optimical filter etc. This structure resembles&lt;br /&gt;
a microhotplate similar to other micro-fabricated devices&lt;br /&gt;
such as gas sensors &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. Spannhake, O. Schulz, A. Helwig, G. Müller and T. Doll, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2005.1597811 Design, development and operational concept of an advanced MEMS IR source for miniaturized gas sensor systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;,  Proc. Sensors, 762-765, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and infrared sources &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;M. Graf, D. Barrettino, S. Taschini, C. Hagleitner, A. Hierlemann and H. Baltes, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac035432h Metal oxide-based monolithic complementary metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor microsystem]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, Anal. Chem., 76:4437-4445, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. See &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;fig:tempprof&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, the temperature profile for the SiN membrane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The governing heat transfer equation in the membrane is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla \cdot (\kappa \nabla T)+Q - \rho c_p \cdot \frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the thermal conductivity in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-1} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, cp is the specific heat capacity in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; J kg^{-1} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the mass density in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;kg m^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the temperature distribution. We assume a homogeneous heat generation rate over a lumped resistor:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = \frac{u^2(t)}{R(T)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the heat generation rate per unit volume in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
We use the initial condition &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; T_0 = 273K &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the&lt;br /&gt;
Dirichlet boundary condition &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; T = 273 K &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the bottom of&lt;br /&gt;
the computational domain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The convection boundary condition at the top of the membrane is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
q=h(T-T_{air}), &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the heat transfer coefficient between the membrane and the ambient air in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-2} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discretization==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the above convection boundary condition and assuming &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{air}=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, finite element discretization of the heat transfer model leads to the parametrized system as below,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(E_0+\rho c_p \cdot E_1) \dot{T} +(A_0 +\kappa \cdot A_1 +h \cdot A_2)T = B \frac{u^2(t)}{R(T)}, \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y=C T,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where the volumetric heat capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, thermal conductivity&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the heat transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; between the membrane&lt;br /&gt;
are kept as parameters. The volumetric hear capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the product of two independent variables, i.e. the specific hear capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the density &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The range of interest for the four independent variables are respectively &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa \in [2, 5]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c_p \in [400, 750]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho \in [3000,3200]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; h \in [10, 12]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The frequency range is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f \in [0,25]Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
What is of interest is the output in time domain. The interesting time interval is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t \in [0,0.04]s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is either a constant heat resistivity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0(1+\alpha T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which depends linearly on the temperature. Here we use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_0=274.94 \Omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and temperature coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha=2.293 \pm 0.006 \times 10^{-4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The model was created and meshed in ANSYS. It contains a constant load vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; corresponding to the constant input power of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The number of degrees of freedom is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=60,020&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The input function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a step function with the value &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which disappears at the time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.02s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This means between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.02s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; input is one and after that it is zero. However, be aware that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is just a factor with which the load vector B is multiplied and which corresponds to the heating power of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This means if one keeps &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as suggested above, the device is heated with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for the time length of 0.02s and after that the heating is turned off. If for whatever reason, one wants the heating power to be &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;5mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has to be set equal to two, etc...&lt;br /&gt;
When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0(1+\alpha T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, it is a function of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and hence, the system has non-linear input. (It is also called a weakly nonlinear system.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The model is generated in ANSYS. The system matrices are in &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/ MatrixMarket]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; format and can be downloaded here: [[Media: SiN_membrane.tgz|SiN_membrane.tgz]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; [[User:Feng|Lihong Feng]] &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://simulation.uni-freiburg.de/staff/profiles/DrTamaraBechtold Tamara Bechtold]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Silicon_Nitride_Membrane&amp;diff=1601</id>
		<title>Silicon Nitride Membrane</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Silicon_Nitride_Membrane&amp;diff=1601"/>
		<updated>2013-11-27T10:04:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Discretization */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:parametric 2-5 parameters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;figure id=&amp;quot;fig:tempprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:Fig_1.png|right|frame|&amp;lt;caption&amp;gt;silicon nitride membrane temperature profile&amp;lt;/caption&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/figure&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &#039;&#039;&#039;silicon nitride membrane&#039;&#039;&#039; (SiN membrane) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;T. Bechtold, D. Hohfeld, E. B. Rudnyi and M. Guenther, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/20/4/045030 Efficient extraction of thin-film thermal parameters from numerical models via parametric model order reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, J. Micromech. Microeng. 20(2010) 045030 (13pp).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; can be a part of a gas sensor, but also a part of an infra-red sensor, a michrothruster, an optimical filter etc. This structure resembles&lt;br /&gt;
a microhotplate similar to other micro-fabricated devices&lt;br /&gt;
such as gas sensors &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. Spannhake, O. Schulz, A. Helwig, G. Müller and T. Doll, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2005.1597811 Design, development and operational concept of an advanced MEMS IR source for miniaturized gas sensor systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;,  Proc. Sensors, 762-765, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and infrared sources &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;M. Graf, D. Barrettino, S. Taschini, C. Hagleitner, A. Hierlemann and H. Baltes, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac035432h Metal oxide-based monolithic complementary metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor microsystem]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, Anal. Chem., 76:4437-4445, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. See &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;fig:tempprof&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, the temperature profile for the SiN membrane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The governing heat transfer equation in the membrane is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla \cdot (\kappa \nabla T)+Q - \rho c_p \cdot \frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the thermal conductivity in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-1} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, cp is the specific heat capacity in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; J kg^{-1} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the mass density in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;kg m^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the temperature distribution. We assume a homogeneous heat generation rate over a lumped resistor:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = \frac{u^2(t)}{R(T)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the heat generation rate per unit volume in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
We use the initial condition &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; T_0 = 273K &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the&lt;br /&gt;
Dirichlet boundary condition &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; T = 273 K &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the bottom of&lt;br /&gt;
the computational domain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The convection boundary condition at the top of the membrane is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
q=h(T-T_{air}), &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the heat transfer coefficient between the membrane and the ambient air in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-2} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discretization==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the above convection boundary condition and assuming &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{air}=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, finite element discretization of the heat transfer model leads to the parametrized system as below,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(E_0+\rho c_p \cdot E_1) \dot{T} +(A_0 +\kappa \cdot A_1 +h \cdot A_2)T = B \frac{u^2(t)}{R(T)}, \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y=C T,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where the volumetric heat capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, thermal conductivity&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the heat transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; between the membrane&lt;br /&gt;
are kept as parameters. The volumetric hear capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the product of two independent variables, i.e. the specific hear capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the density &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The range of interest for the four independent variables are respectively &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa \in [2, 5]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c_p \in [400, 750]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho \in [3000,3200]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; h \in [10, 12]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The frequency range is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f \in [0,25]Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
What is interested is the output in time domain. The interesting time interval is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t \in [0,0.04]s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is either a constant heat resistivity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0(1+\alpha T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which depends linearly on the temperature. Here we use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_0=274.94 \Omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and temperature coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha=2.293 \pm 0.006 \times 10^{-4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The model was created and meshed in ANSYS. It contains a constant load vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; corresponding to the constant input power of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The number of degrees of freedom is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=60,020&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The input function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a step function with the value &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which disappears at the time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.02s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This means between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.02s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; input is one and after that it is zero. However, be aware that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is just a factor with which the load vector B is multiplied and which corresponds to the heating power of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This means if one keeps &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as suggested above, the device is heated with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for the time length of 0.02s and after that the heating is turned off. If for whatever reason, one wants the heating power to be &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;5mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has to be set equal to two, etc...&lt;br /&gt;
When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0(1+\alpha T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, it is a function of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and hence, the system has non-linear input. (It is also called a weakly nonlinear system.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The model is generated in ANSYS. The system matrices are in &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/ MatrixMarket]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; format and can be downloaded here: [[Media: SiN_membrane.tgz|SiN_membrane.tgz]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; [[User:Feng|Lihong Feng]] &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://simulation.uni-freiburg.de/staff/profiles/DrTamaraBechtold Tamara Bechtold]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Silicon_Nitride_Membrane&amp;diff=1598</id>
		<title>Silicon Nitride Membrane</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Silicon_Nitride_Membrane&amp;diff=1598"/>
		<updated>2013-11-13T13:47:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Discretization */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:parametric 2-5 parameters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;figure id=&amp;quot;fig:tempprof&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:Fig_1.png|right|frame|&amp;lt;caption&amp;gt;silicon nitride membrane temperature profile&amp;lt;/caption&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/figure&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &#039;&#039;&#039;silicon nitride membrane&#039;&#039;&#039; (SiN membrane) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;T. Bechtold, D. Hohfeld, E. B. Rudnyi and M. Guenther, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/20/4/045030 Efficient extraction of thin-film thermal parameters from numerical models via parametric model order reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, J. Micromech. Microeng. 20(2010) 045030 (13pp).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; can be a part of a gas sensor, but also a part of an infra-red sensor, a michrothruster, an optimical filter etc. This structure resembles&lt;br /&gt;
a microhotplate similar to other micro-fabricated devices&lt;br /&gt;
such as gas sensors &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. Spannhake, O. Schulz, A. Helwig, G. Müller and T. Doll, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2005.1597811 Design, development and operational concept of an advanced MEMS IR source for miniaturized gas sensor systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;,  Proc. Sensors, 762-765, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and infrared sources &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;M. Graf, D. Barrettino, S. Taschini, C. Hagleitner, A. Hierlemann and H. Baltes, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac035432h Metal oxide-based monolithic complementary metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor microsystem]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, Anal. Chem., 76:4437-4445, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. See &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;fig:tempprof&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, the temperature profile for the SiN membrane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The governing heat transfer equation in the membrane is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \nabla \cdot (\kappa \nabla T)+Q - \rho c_p \cdot \frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=0 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the thermal conductivity in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-1} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, cp is the specific heat capacity in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; J kg^{-1} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the mass density in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;kg m^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the temperature distribution. We assume a homogeneous heat generation rate over a lumped resistor:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = \frac{u^2(t)}{R(T)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the heat generation rate per unit volume in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
We use the initial condition &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; T_0 = 273K &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the&lt;br /&gt;
Dirichlet boundary condition &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; T = 273 K &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at the bottom of&lt;br /&gt;
the computational domain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The convection boundary condition at the top of the membrane is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
q=h(T-T_{air}), &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the heat transfer coefficient between the membrane and the ambient air in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W m^{-2} K^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discretization==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the above convection boundary condition and assuming &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{air}=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, finite element discretization of the heat transfer model leads to the parametrized system as below,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(E_0+\rho c_p \cdot E_1) \dot{T} +(A_0 +\kappa \cdot A_1 +h \cdot A_2)T = B \frac{u^2(t)}{R(T)}, \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y=C T,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where the volumetric heat capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, thermal conductivity&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the heat transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; between the membrane&lt;br /&gt;
are kept as parameters. The volumetric hear capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the product of two independent variables, i.e. the specific hear capacity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the density &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The range of interest for the four independent variables are respectively &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\kappa \in [2, 5]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c_p \in [400, 750]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho \in [3000,3200]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; h \in [10, 12]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The frequency range is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f \in [0,25]Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is either a constant heat resistivity &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0(1+\alpha T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which depends linearly on the temperature. Here we use &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_0=274.94 \Omega&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and temperature coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha=2.293 \pm 0.006 \times 10^{-4}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The model was created and meshed in ANSYS. It contains a constant load vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; corresponding to the constant input power of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The number of degrees of freedom is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=60,020&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The input function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a step function with the value &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which disappears at the time &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.02s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This means between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.02s&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; input is one and after that it is zero. However, be aware that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is just a factor with which the load vector B is multiplied and which corresponds to the heating power of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This means if one keeps &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as suggested above, the device is heated with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.49mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for the time length of 0.02s and after that the heating is turned off. If for whatever reason, one wants the heating power to be &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;5mW&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has to be set equal to two, etc...&lt;br /&gt;
When &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R(T)=R_0(1+\alpha T)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, it is a function of the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and hence, the system has non-linear input. (It is also called a weakly nonlinear system.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The model is generated in ANSYS. The system matrices are in &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/ MatrixMarket]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; format and can be downloaded here: [[Media: SiN_membrane.tgz|SiN_membrane.tgz]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039; [[User:Feng|Lihong Feng]] &#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://simulation.uni-freiburg.de/staff/profiles/DrTamaraBechtold Tamara Bechtold]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Transmission_Lines&amp;diff=1539</id>
		<title>Talk:Transmission Lines</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Transmission_Lines&amp;diff=1539"/>
		<updated>2013-06-03T08:37:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: Created page with &amp;quot; These examples are non-parametric systems, so I deleted the category: Parametric 2-5 parameters. ---L. Feng&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
These examples are non-parametric systems, so I deleted the category: Parametric 2-5 parameters. ---L. Feng&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Transmission_Lines&amp;diff=1538</id>
		<title>Transmission Lines</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Transmission_Lines&amp;diff=1538"/>
		<updated>2013-06-03T08:35:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE index 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In communications and electronic engineering, a transmission line is a specialized cable designed to carry alternating current of radio frequency, that is, currents with a frequency high enough that their wave nature must be taken into account. &#039;&#039;&#039;Transmission lines&#039;&#039;&#039; are used for purposes such as connecting radio transmitters and receivers with their antennas, distributing cable television signals, and computer network connections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many electric circuits, the length of the wires connecting the components can often be ignored. That is, the voltage on the wire at a given time can be assumed to be the same at all points. However, when the voltage changes as fast as the signal travels through the wire, the length becomes important and the wire must be treated as a transmission line, with distributed parameters. Stated in another way, the length of the wire is important when the signal includes frequency components with corresponding wavelengths comparable to or less than the length of the wire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A common rule of thumb is that the cable or wire should be treated as a transmission line if its length is greater than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1/10&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the wavelength, and the interconnect is called &amp;quot;electrically long&amp;quot;. At this length the phase delay and the interference of any reflections on the line (as well as other undesired effects) become important and can lead to unpredictable behavior in systems which have not been carefully designed using transmission line theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-multiconductor transmission line is composed by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; coupled conductors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decrease of integrated circuit feature size and the increase of operating frequencies require 3-D electromagnetic methods, such as the Partial Element Equivalent Circuit (PEEC) method; it stems from the integral equation form of Maxwell&#039;s equations. The main difference of the PEEC method with other integral-Equation-based techniques, such as the method of moments, resides in the fact that it provides a circuit interpretation of the Electric Field Integral Equation (EFIE) in terms of partial elements, namely resistances, partial inductances, and coefficients of potential. In the standard approach, volumes and surfaces are discretized into elementary regions, hexahedra, and patches respectively over which the current and charge densities are expanded into a series of basis functions. Pulse basis functions are usually adopted as expansion and weight functions. Such choice of pulse basis functions corresponds to assuming constant current density and charge density over the elementary volume (inductive) and surface (capacitive) cells, respectively. Following the standard Galerkin&#039;s testing procedure, topological elements, namely nodes and branches, are generated and electrical lumped elements are identified modeling both the magnetic and electric field coupling. Conductors are modeled by their ohmic resistance, while dielectrics requires modeling the excess charge due to the dielectric polarization. Magnetic and electric field coupling are modeled by partial inductances and coefficients of potential, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The magnetic field coupling between two inductive volume cells &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\beta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is described by the partial inductance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; L_{p_{\alpha\beta}}=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\frac{1}{a_{\alpha}a_{\beta}}\int_{u_{\alpha}}\int_{u_{\beta}}\frac{1}{R_{\alpha\beta}}\,du_{\alpha}\,du_{\beta} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_{\alpha\beta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between any two points in the volumes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u_{\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u_{\beta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a_{\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a_{\beta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; their cross section. The electric field coupling between two capacitive surface cells &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is modeled by the coefficient of the potential&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; P_{\delta\gamma}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\frac{1}{S_{\delta}S_{\gamma}}\int_{S_{\delta}}\int_{S_{\gamma}}\frac{1}{R_{\delta\gamma}}\,dS_{\delta}\,dS_{\gamma} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_{\delta\gamma}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the distance between any two points on the surfaces &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gamma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, while &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_{\delta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_{\gamma}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; denote the area of their respective surfaces &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ferranti11&amp;quot;&amp;gt; F. Ferranti, G. Antonini, T. Dhaene, L. Knockaert, and A. E. Ruehli, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCPMT.2010.2101912 Physics-based passivity-preserving parameterized model order reduction for PEEC circuit analysis]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 1, num. 3, pp. 399-409, March 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generalized Kirchhoff&#039;s laws for conductors, when dielectrics are considered, can be rewritten as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \textbf{P}^{-1}\frac{d\textbf{v}(t)}{dt}-\textbf{A}^T\textbf{i}(t)+\textbf{i}_e(t)=0, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;figure id=&amp;quot;fig:peec&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[File:Peec.jpg|400px|frame|&amp;lt;caption&amp;gt;Illustration of PEEC circuit electrical quantities for a conductor elementary cell (Figure from &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ferranti11&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;).&amp;lt;/caption&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/figure&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; -\textbf{A}\textbf{v}(t)-\textbf{L}_p\frac{d\textbf{i}(t)}{dt}-\textbf{v}_d(t)=0, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;  \textbf{i}(t)=\textbf{C}_d\frac{d\textbf{v}_d(t)}{dt} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{A}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the connectivity matrix, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{v}(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; denotes the node potentials to infinity, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{i}(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{i}_e(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; represent the currents flowing in volume cells and the external currents, respectively, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{v}_d(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the excess capacitance voltage drop, which is related to the excess charge by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{v}_d(t)=\textbf{C}_d^{-1}\textbf{q}_d(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A selection matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{K}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is introduced to define the port voltages by selecting node potentials. The same matrix is used to obtain the external currents &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{i}_e(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by the currents &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{i}_s(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which are of opposite sign with respect to the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; port currents &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{i}_p(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \textbf{v}_p(t)=\textbf{K}\textbf{v}(t), &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \textbf{i}_e(t)=\textbf{K}^T\textbf{i}_s(t). &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example of PEEC circuit electrical quantities for a conductor elementary cell is illustrated, in the Laplace domain, in &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;fig:peec&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, where the current-controlled voltage sources &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;sL_{p,ij}I_j&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the current-controlled current sources &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I_{cci}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; model the magnetic and electric coupling, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, assuming that we are interested in generating an admittance representation having &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; output currents under voltage excitation, and let us denote with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the number of nodes, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the number of branches where currents flow, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_c&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the number of branches of conductors, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the number of dielectrics, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the additional unknowns since dielectrics require the excess capacitance to model the polarization charge, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_u=n_i+n_d+n_n+n_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the global number of unknowns, and if the Modified Nodal Analysis (MNA) approach is used, we have:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \left[ \begin{array}{cccc} \textbf{P} &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_n,n_i} &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_n,n_d} &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_n,n_p} \\ \textbf{0}_{n_i,n_n} &amp;amp; \textbf{L}_p &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_i,n_d} &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_i,n_p} \\ \textbf{0}_{n_d,n_n} &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_d,n_i} &amp;amp; \textbf{C}_d &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_d,n_p} \\ \textbf{0}_{n_p,n_n} &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_p,n_i} &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_p,n_d} &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_p,n_p} \end{array}\right]\frac{d}{dt}\left[ \begin{array}{c}\textbf{q}(t) \\ \textbf{i}(t) \\ \textbf{v}_d(t) \\ \textbf{i}_s(t) \end{array}\right]= &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;= - \left[ \begin{array}{cccc}\textbf{0}_{n_n,n_n} &amp;amp; -\textbf{P}\textbf{A}^T &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_n,n_d} &amp;amp; \textbf{P}\textbf{K}^T \\ \textbf{AP} &amp;amp; \textbf{R} &amp;amp; \Phi &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_i,n_p} \\ \textbf{0}_{n_d,n_n} &amp;amp; -\Phi^T &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_d,n_d} &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_d,n_p} \\ -\textbf{K}\textbf{P} &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_p,n_i} &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_p,n_d} &amp;amp; \textbf{0}_{n_p,n_p} \end{array}\right]\cdot\left[ \begin{array}{c} \textbf{q}(t) \\ \textbf{i}(t) \\ \textbf{v}_d(t) \\ \textbf{i}_s(t) \end{array}\right]+ \left[ \begin{array}{c}\textbf{0}_{n_n+n_i+n_d,n_p} \\ -\textbf{I}_{n_p,n_p} \end{array}\right] \cdot [ \textbf{v}_p(t) ]. &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{0}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a matrix of zeros, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{I}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the identity matrix, both are with appropriate dimensions, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Phi=\left[ \begin{array}{c} \textbf{0}_{n_c,n_d} \\ \textbf{I}_{n_d,n_d} \end{array}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Then, in a more compact form, the above equation can be written as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \left\{ \begin{array}{c}  \textbf{C}\frac{d\textbf{x}(t)}{dt}=-\textbf{G}\textbf{x}(t)+\textbf{B}\textbf{u}(t)\\ &lt;br /&gt;
\textbf{i}_p(t)=\textbf{L}^T\textbf{x}(t) \end{array}\right . \qquad (1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{x}(t)=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} \textbf{q}(t)\quad\textbf{i}(t)\quad\textbf{v}_d(t)\quad\textbf{i}_s(t) \end{array}\right]^T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Since this is an &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-port formulation, whereby the only sources are the voltage sources at the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-ports nodes, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{B}=\textbf{L}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textbf{B}\in\mathbb R^{n_u\times n_p}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for more details on this model, refer to &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ferranti11&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Motivation of MOR==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the number of equations produced by 3-D electromagnetic method PEEC is usually very large, the inclusion of the PEEC model directly into a circuit simulator (like SPICE) is computationally intractable for complex structures, where the number of circuit elements can be tens of thousands. Model order reduction (MOR) methods have proven to be very effective in combating such high complexity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All data sets (in a MATLAB formatted data, downloadable in [[Media:TransmissionLines.rar|TransmissionLines.rar]]) in &amp;lt;xr id=&amp;quot;tab:peec&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; are referred to as the multiconductor &#039;&#039;&#039;transmission lines&#039;&#039;&#039; in a MNA form, coming from the PEEC method (then, with dense matrices since they are obtained from the integral formulation of Maxwell&#039;s equation). The LTI descriptor systems have the form of, equation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C\in\mathbb R^{n\times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=C^T\ge0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G\in\mathbb R^{n\times n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G+G^T\ge0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B\in\mathbb R^{n\times m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L=B^T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)\in\mathbb R^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the vector of variables (charges, currents and node potential), the input signal &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)\in\mathbb R^m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the sources (current or voltage generators depending on what one wants to analyze: the impedances or the admittances) linked to some node, the output &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t)\in\mathbb R^m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the observation across the node where the sources are inserted. An accurate model of the dynamics of these data sets is generated between 10 KHz and 20 GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;figtable id=&amp;quot;tab:peec&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ align=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;caption-side: bottom; text-align:justify&amp;quot; | (*) extract the matrices with Matlab command &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[G,B,L,D,C]=dssdata(dssObjectName);&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (e.g., if one wants to work on one of the last two data sets of this table, just load it into the Matlab Workspace and type the command aforementioned on the Command Windows; for the first example, once one loads the data, the Workspace shows directly the matrices).&lt;br /&gt;
! Name of the data set   !!   Matrices   !!   Dimension   !!   Number of inputs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dsysPEEC-MTLn1600m14   ||   G,B,C (L=B&#039;;D=0;) || 1600 || 14&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dsysPEEC-MTLn2654m30   ||    dss object (*)    || 2654 || 30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dsysPEEC-MTLn5248m62   ||    dss object (*)    || 5248 || 62&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/figtable&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Deluca]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Feng]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Balanced_Truncation&amp;diff=1512</id>
		<title>Talk:Balanced Truncation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Balanced_Truncation&amp;diff=1512"/>
		<updated>2013-05-30T07:00:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I prefer to add a wiki page for the cross Gramian approach and delete the direct truncation part (where does the name come from?) here. - U. Baur&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK with me. The source of the name I don&#039;t remember, I guess some talk, I have been using it for some time. It seems fitting, as without the balancing the truncation happens directly, thus my initial append of the BT article due to the close relation. - C. Himpe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with U. Baur. This direct truncation is usually referred to as cross Gramian balanced truncation for which several extra research articles can be found. &lt;br /&gt;
Hence, it should be called that way, or it should get a wiki page of its own. Either way some references are required. - P. Kürschner&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please add a reference that introduces / uses the term &amp;quot;Cross Gramian Balancing&amp;quot;. Thanks. - C. Himpe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only reference with the term &amp;quot;Cross Gramian Balancing&amp;quot; I was able to find is &amp;quot;Model reduction using semidefinite programming&amp;quot;, which is touches the cross gramian topic with only 5 lines of text and cites a Sorensen paper from 2002 which uses the term &amp;quot;Approximate Balancing&amp;quot;. I did find no reference to &amp;quot;Cross Gramian Balanced Truncation&amp;quot;. In both cases I just might not have looked in right places. I personally would prefer a naming that focusses on the Truncation and not the Balancing, since there is no balancing procedure (as with WC and WO) involved, thus my usage of &amp;quot;Direct Truncation&amp;quot;. - C. Himpe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The origin is exactly this Sorensen, Anthoulas paper. The term, approximate reduction is, however, commonly associated with approaches where the Gramians are in some way approximated.&lt;br /&gt;
It does to my knowledge not refer to this particular approach.  - P. Kürschner&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To make it clearer, I think it is not bad to add some sentences like: The original system is directly truncated by the Cross Gramian approach without any balancing. The reduced model is thus not balanced. -L. Feng&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Power_system_examples&amp;diff=1462</id>
		<title>Power system examples</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Power_system_examples&amp;diff=1462"/>
		<updated>2013-05-29T06:32:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Contact */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified‏‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These first order systems are given in generalized state space form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E\dot{x}(t)=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t)+Du(t),\quad E,A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n},~B\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times m},~C\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times n},~D\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times m}\quad(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and originated at [http://www.cepel.br/ CEPEL] for simulating large &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They come in different sizes and variants, including both SISO and MIMO systems having regular or singular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; matrices. In the latter case the DAEs are of index 1 (except for PI Sections 20--80) and using simple row and column permutations, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E,A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be brought into the form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E=\left[ \begin{array}{cc}I_{n_f}&amp;amp;0\\0&amp;amp;0\end{array}\right],\quad A=\left[ \begin{array}{cc}A_{11}&amp;amp;A_{12}\\A_{21}&amp;amp;A_{22}\end{array}\right],&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; denotes the number of finite eigenvalues in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Lambda(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_{22}\in\mathbb{R}^{n-n_f\times n-n_f}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is regular.&lt;br /&gt;
A complete overview over these systems can be found in table below. The &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; served as benchmark examples for [[Modal truncation|Dominant Pole based Modal Truncation]]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Rom07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kue10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and for a special adaption&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of [[Balanced Truncation]] for the index-1 DAE systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
The table below lists the charateristics of all &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;. The files can be downloaded at [https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; width: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Name&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|New England&lt;br /&gt;
|66 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|ODE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97&lt;br /&gt;
|13251 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/1997&lt;br /&gt;
|13250 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/2007&lt;br /&gt;
|21476	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO8&lt;br /&gt;
|13309	&lt;br /&gt;
|8 	&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO28&lt;br /&gt;
|13251 	&lt;br /&gt;
|28 	&lt;br /&gt;
|28&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO46&lt;br /&gt;
|13250	&lt;br /&gt;
|46	&lt;br /&gt;
|46&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Juba5723&lt;br /&gt;
|40337 	&lt;br /&gt;
|2 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bauru5727&lt;br /&gt;
|40366	&lt;br /&gt;
|2 	&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|zeros_nopss&lt;br /&gt;
|13296	&lt;br /&gt;
|46 	&lt;br /&gt;
|46&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|xingo6u&lt;br /&gt;
|20738	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nopss&lt;br /&gt;
|11685&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_606&lt;br /&gt;
|7135	&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_1142&lt;br /&gt;
|9735&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_1450&lt;br /&gt;
|11305&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_1693&lt;br /&gt;
|13275&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_1998&lt;br /&gt;
|15066&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_2476&lt;br /&gt;
|16861&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_3078&lt;br /&gt;
|21128&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|PI Sections 20-80&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| 	&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
Electrical &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; experience several steady-state and dynamic phenomena that may hinder its reliable, stable operation if not properly designed and operated. Among the dynamic phenomena, &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; angle stability is of major concern, its studies requiring both numerical integration of a stiff set of large, nonlinear differential-algebraic (DAE) equations (for transient stability simulations) and  the eigensolution as well as the use of other Numerical Linear Algebra (NLA) algorithms applied to  the linearized DAE equations of the same large stability models. &#039;&#039;&#039;Power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; with multiple electrical power plants, consumer and industrial loads experience complex electromechanical oscillations, much alike spring-mass mechanical systems  experience mechanical oscillations. These oscillations, when the electric &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; is under stressed conditions, may become poorly-damped or unstable. The analysis of these low-frequency oscillations, as well as their controller-induced damping control, is enhanced by the results from NLA algorithms, all this constituting the study area known as small signal stability. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a pressing need for better utilization of the transmission network and its cost-effective expansions, to reliably carry electric power from the generating plants, driven by several primary energy sources, to the loads. This imposes stricter requirements on network design and &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; control equipment, as well as in the adopted control laws, which coupled with the continental dimensions of modern interconnected &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;, must be studied with the help of simulators employing advanced NLA algorithms. This wiki page contains system models developed when dealing with these NLA issues, with emphasis on the analysis and control of small signal stability.&lt;br /&gt;
Modal analysis has been used for Model Order Reduction (MOR) of lightly damped systems like flexible mechanical structures and RLC networks from either &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; or microprocessor interconnectors. The advent of subspace accelerated dominant pole algorithms in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, made modal reduction effective for better damped systems, such as interconnected &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;, which have eigenvalue clusters in the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.0 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; range and damping ratios between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-0.05&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.25&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Important characteristics of model reduction methods include preserving the dominant dynamics and stability in the Reduced Order Models (ROMs). &lt;br /&gt;
Model reduction is important to the linear control system analysis and design of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; dynamic models. Reduced-order &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; transfer function models are effective in lowering the computational costs of controller design. Once the dominant transfer function poles have been found, the calculation of their associated residues can be obtained by the scalar product of the left and right eigenvectors by the input and output vectors of the transfer function. From the knowledge of the dominant pole-residue set, one can build a transfer function ROM whose accuracy varies with the number of retained poles. See SADPA, SAMDP papers &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Modal analysis is also used in the harmonic distortion analysis of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; networks, mainly in subtransmission and distribution voltage levels. In this application, modal analysis allows determining the main network parameters that impact distortion levels and suggest changes to their effective values among other alternatives. The linear RLC network is modeled unloaded, the conventional electrical generators can be entirely neglected and the nonlinear loads of various nature are modeled as current injections into the network buses -3rd, 5th, 7th, 11th, 13th harmonics of the nominal system frequency (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;50 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;60 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;).  An even more important application for the modal analysis of these large descriptor system RLC network models is the production of ROM for multiport electrical networks, generally in the form of a state-space system whose dimension is considerably smaller than the original system. When these ROMs take the form of RLC networks, they are referred to as RLC reduced equivalents. These ROMs, or equivalents, are used in real-time and off-line simulators for the study of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; high-frequency transient phenomena. They are produced in varying degrees of complexity by using advanced NLA algorithms, this being an area of intense research work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Test systems for small-signal stability analysis of large electric power system networks==&lt;br /&gt;
All test &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; in [https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software], except the PI sections example, are used for &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; small-signal stability studies, and several of them are briefly described in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Such studies include stability analysis, controller design, computation of  MOR, etc. The dynamic phenomena of interest require the detailed modeling of the electrical energy generators (mainly the large sized ones) and other important devices such as flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS). The 3-phase alternating current (AC) network is comprised of nodes (electrical buses, which may be the representation of an entire electrical energy transmission (or distribution) substation, and branches (transmission lines, transformers, series capacitors) and need have only a static model in this application except for the occasional high-power electronic HVDC (High voltage direct current) transmission links and FACTS  devices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The input &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  depends on the study of interest, but the excitation system voltage reference is a frequent input variable in small-signal stability studies. Another reference is the active power setpoint of a rotor-speed regulator. The input signal used in all the above mentioned  files is of Vref type. The output could be an entry of the generalized state &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (state or algebraic variable) or a linear combination of these variables. The generalized states &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are associated with equations of generators, controllers and network. The interconnected network has only algebraic variables, except when FACTS devices are connected. &lt;br /&gt;
The test systems are represented by generalized state-space models, see &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the feed through matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is generally zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Test systems for electromagnetic transients and harmonic distortion studies==&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the harmonic study at hand, a voltage or current source can be assigned as an input. In &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the current injection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a node (also, electrical bus, in &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; terminology) is the input, while the nodal voltage, at the same node, is the  output (variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All transmission lines in the network are modeled by RLC ladder networks, of cascaded RLC PI-circuits, having fixed parameters &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Wat03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The transformers are modeled by series RL circuits. Loads and shunt elements are represented by  series-connected RL (or RC) branch, or just an L (or C). As a consequence, the states &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the dynamic system are either the current through an inductor or the voltage across a capacitor. So matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A, B, C, D, E&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; describe how each circuit element equation, node and voltage are connected, according to the Kirchhoff’s law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software the systems labeled by PI Sections 20--80 are of index-2 ([https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software/PIsections20to80.zip SISO_PI_n.zip and MIMO_PI_n.zip]). The data of these test systems can be converted into index-0 systems by applying a procedure for symbolic math elimination of algebraic variables and redundant state variables. This procedure is detailed in the Appendix C of &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM11&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ([https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software/PIsections20to80.zip SISO_PI_n.zip and MIMO_PI_n.zip]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N. Martins, L. Lima, and H. Pinto, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=486093 Computing dominant poles of power system transfer functions]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.11, no.1, pp.162-170, 1996&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?isnumber=34850&amp;amp;arnumber=1664957&amp;amp;count=60&amp;amp;index=22 Efficient computation of transfer function dominant poles using subspace acceleration]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.21, no.3, pp.1218-1226, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?isnumber=36135&amp;amp;arnumber=1717547&amp;amp;count=61&amp;amp;index=0 Efficient computation of multivariable transfer function dominant poles using subspace acceleration]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.21, no.4, pp.1471-1483, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Rom07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2007-0626-202553/index.htm Methods for eigenvalue problems with applications in model order reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, Ph.D. dissertation, Universiteit&lt;br /&gt;
Utrecht, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://link.aip.org/link/?SCE/30/2137 Computing transfer function dominant poles of large second-order dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot; SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 30, Issue 4, 2008, pp. 2137-2157&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F. Freitas, J. Rommes, and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4558425 Gramian-based reduction method applied to large sparse power system descriptor models]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot; IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1258-1270, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kue10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;P. K&amp;amp;uuml;rschner, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/mpcsc/mitarbeiter/kuerschner/docs/masterthesis.pdf Two-sided eigenvalue methods for modal approximation]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;”, Master’s thesis, Chemnitz University of Technology,&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Mathematics, Germany, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM11&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F. D. Freitas, N. Martins, S. L. Varricchio, J. Rommes and F. C. Veliz, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?reload=true&amp;amp;isnumber=6048014&amp;amp;arnumber=5766070 Reduced-Order Transfer Matrices from RLC Network Descriptor Models of Electric Power Grids]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1905-1916, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Wat03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N. Watson and J. Arrillaga, Power Systems Electromagnetic Transients Simulation, IET, London, UK, 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rommes|Joost Rommes]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:kuerschner|Patrick Kürschner]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.nelsonmartins.com/ Nelson Martins]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.ene.unb.br/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=120&amp;amp;Itemid=84/ Francisco D. Freitas]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Power_system_examples&amp;diff=1461</id>
		<title>Power system examples</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Power_system_examples&amp;diff=1461"/>
		<updated>2013-05-29T06:31:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Contact */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified‏‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These first order systems are given in generalized state space form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E\dot{x}(t)=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t)+Du(t),\quad E,A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n},~B\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times m},~C\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times n},~D\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times m}\quad(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and originated at [http://www.cepel.br/ CEPEL] for simulating large &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They come in different sizes and variants, including both SISO and MIMO systems having regular or singular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; matrices. In the latter case the DAEs are of index 1 (except for PI Sections 20--80) and using simple row and column permutations, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E,A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be brought into the form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E=\left[ \begin{array}{cc}I_{n_f}&amp;amp;0\\0&amp;amp;0\end{array}\right],\quad A=\left[ \begin{array}{cc}A_{11}&amp;amp;A_{12}\\A_{21}&amp;amp;A_{22}\end{array}\right],&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; denotes the number of finite eigenvalues in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Lambda(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_{22}\in\mathbb{R}^{n-n_f\times n-n_f}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is regular.&lt;br /&gt;
A complete overview over these systems can be found in table below. The &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; served as benchmark examples for [[Modal truncation|Dominant Pole based Modal Truncation]]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Rom07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kue10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and for a special adaption&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of [[Balanced Truncation]] for the index-1 DAE systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
The table below lists the charateristics of all &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;. The files can be downloaded at [https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; width: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Name&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|New England&lt;br /&gt;
|66 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|ODE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97&lt;br /&gt;
|13251 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/1997&lt;br /&gt;
|13250 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/2007&lt;br /&gt;
|21476	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO8&lt;br /&gt;
|13309	&lt;br /&gt;
|8 	&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO28&lt;br /&gt;
|13251 	&lt;br /&gt;
|28 	&lt;br /&gt;
|28&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO46&lt;br /&gt;
|13250	&lt;br /&gt;
|46	&lt;br /&gt;
|46&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Juba5723&lt;br /&gt;
|40337 	&lt;br /&gt;
|2 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bauru5727&lt;br /&gt;
|40366	&lt;br /&gt;
|2 	&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|zeros_nopss&lt;br /&gt;
|13296	&lt;br /&gt;
|46 	&lt;br /&gt;
|46&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|xingo6u&lt;br /&gt;
|20738	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nopss&lt;br /&gt;
|11685&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_606&lt;br /&gt;
|7135	&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_1142&lt;br /&gt;
|9735&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_1450&lt;br /&gt;
|11305&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_1693&lt;br /&gt;
|13275&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_1998&lt;br /&gt;
|15066&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_2476&lt;br /&gt;
|16861&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_3078&lt;br /&gt;
|21128&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|PI Sections 20-80&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| 	&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
Electrical &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; experience several steady-state and dynamic phenomena that may hinder its reliable, stable operation if not properly designed and operated. Among the dynamic phenomena, &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; angle stability is of major concern, its studies requiring both numerical integration of a stiff set of large, nonlinear differential-algebraic (DAE) equations (for transient stability simulations) and  the eigensolution as well as the use of other Numerical Linear Algebra (NLA) algorithms applied to  the linearized DAE equations of the same large stability models. &#039;&#039;&#039;Power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; with multiple electrical power plants, consumer and industrial loads experience complex electromechanical oscillations, much alike spring-mass mechanical systems  experience mechanical oscillations. These oscillations, when the electric &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; is under stressed conditions, may become poorly-damped or unstable. The analysis of these low-frequency oscillations, as well as their controller-induced damping control, is enhanced by the results from NLA algorithms, all this constituting the study area known as small signal stability. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a pressing need for better utilization of the transmission network and its cost-effective expansions, to reliably carry electric power from the generating plants, driven by several primary energy sources, to the loads. This imposes stricter requirements on network design and &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; control equipment, as well as in the adopted control laws, which coupled with the continental dimensions of modern interconnected &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;, must be studied with the help of simulators employing advanced NLA algorithms. This wiki page contains system models developed when dealing with these NLA issues, with emphasis on the analysis and control of small signal stability.&lt;br /&gt;
Modal analysis has been used for Model Order Reduction (MOR) of lightly damped systems like flexible mechanical structures and RLC networks from either &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; or microprocessor interconnectors. The advent of subspace accelerated dominant pole algorithms in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, made modal reduction effective for better damped systems, such as interconnected &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;, which have eigenvalue clusters in the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.0 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; range and damping ratios between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-0.05&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.25&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Important characteristics of model reduction methods include preserving the dominant dynamics and stability in the Reduced Order Models (ROMs). &lt;br /&gt;
Model reduction is important to the linear control system analysis and design of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; dynamic models. Reduced-order &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; transfer function models are effective in lowering the computational costs of controller design. Once the dominant transfer function poles have been found, the calculation of their associated residues can be obtained by the scalar product of the left and right eigenvectors by the input and output vectors of the transfer function. From the knowledge of the dominant pole-residue set, one can build a transfer function ROM whose accuracy varies with the number of retained poles. See SADPA, SAMDP papers &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Modal analysis is also used in the harmonic distortion analysis of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; networks, mainly in subtransmission and distribution voltage levels. In this application, modal analysis allows determining the main network parameters that impact distortion levels and suggest changes to their effective values among other alternatives. The linear RLC network is modeled unloaded, the conventional electrical generators can be entirely neglected and the nonlinear loads of various nature are modeled as current injections into the network buses -3rd, 5th, 7th, 11th, 13th harmonics of the nominal system frequency (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;50 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;60 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;).  An even more important application for the modal analysis of these large descriptor system RLC network models is the production of ROM for multiport electrical networks, generally in the form of a state-space system whose dimension is considerably smaller than the original system. When these ROMs take the form of RLC networks, they are referred to as RLC reduced equivalents. These ROMs, or equivalents, are used in real-time and off-line simulators for the study of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; high-frequency transient phenomena. They are produced in varying degrees of complexity by using advanced NLA algorithms, this being an area of intense research work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Test systems for small-signal stability analysis of large electric power system networks==&lt;br /&gt;
All test &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; in [https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software], except the PI sections example, are used for &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; small-signal stability studies, and several of them are briefly described in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Such studies include stability analysis, controller design, computation of  MOR, etc. The dynamic phenomena of interest require the detailed modeling of the electrical energy generators (mainly the large sized ones) and other important devices such as flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS). The 3-phase alternating current (AC) network is comprised of nodes (electrical buses, which may be the representation of an entire electrical energy transmission (or distribution) substation, and branches (transmission lines, transformers, series capacitors) and need have only a static model in this application except for the occasional high-power electronic HVDC (High voltage direct current) transmission links and FACTS  devices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The input &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  depends on the study of interest, but the excitation system voltage reference is a frequent input variable in small-signal stability studies. Another reference is the active power setpoint of a rotor-speed regulator. The input signal used in all the above mentioned  files is of Vref type. The output could be an entry of the generalized state &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (state or algebraic variable) or a linear combination of these variables. The generalized states &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are associated with equations of generators, controllers and network. The interconnected network has only algebraic variables, except when FACTS devices are connected. &lt;br /&gt;
The test systems are represented by generalized state-space models, see &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the feed through matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is generally zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Test systems for electromagnetic transients and harmonic distortion studies==&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the harmonic study at hand, a voltage or current source can be assigned as an input. In &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the current injection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a node (also, electrical bus, in &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; terminology) is the input, while the nodal voltage, at the same node, is the  output (variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All transmission lines in the network are modeled by RLC ladder networks, of cascaded RLC PI-circuits, having fixed parameters &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Wat03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The transformers are modeled by series RL circuits. Loads and shunt elements are represented by  series-connected RL (or RC) branch, or just an L (or C). As a consequence, the states &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the dynamic system are either the current through an inductor or the voltage across a capacitor. So matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A, B, C, D, E&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; describe how each circuit element equation, node and voltage are connected, according to the Kirchhoff’s law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software the systems labeled by PI Sections 20--80 are of index-2 ([https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software/PIsections20to80.zip SISO_PI_n.zip and MIMO_PI_n.zip]). The data of these test systems can be converted into index-0 systems by applying a procedure for symbolic math elimination of algebraic variables and redundant state variables. This procedure is detailed in the Appendix C of &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM11&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ([https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software/PIsections20to80.zip SISO_PI_n.zip and MIMO_PI_n.zip]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N. Martins, L. Lima, and H. Pinto, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=486093 Computing dominant poles of power system transfer functions]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.11, no.1, pp.162-170, 1996&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?isnumber=34850&amp;amp;arnumber=1664957&amp;amp;count=60&amp;amp;index=22 Efficient computation of transfer function dominant poles using subspace acceleration]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.21, no.3, pp.1218-1226, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?isnumber=36135&amp;amp;arnumber=1717547&amp;amp;count=61&amp;amp;index=0 Efficient computation of multivariable transfer function dominant poles using subspace acceleration]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.21, no.4, pp.1471-1483, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Rom07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2007-0626-202553/index.htm Methods for eigenvalue problems with applications in model order reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, Ph.D. dissertation, Universiteit&lt;br /&gt;
Utrecht, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://link.aip.org/link/?SCE/30/2137 Computing transfer function dominant poles of large second-order dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot; SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 30, Issue 4, 2008, pp. 2137-2157&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F. Freitas, J. Rommes, and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4558425 Gramian-based reduction method applied to large sparse power system descriptor models]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot; IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1258-1270, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kue10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;P. K&amp;amp;uuml;rschner, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/mpcsc/mitarbeiter/kuerschner/docs/masterthesis.pdf Two-sided eigenvalue methods for modal approximation]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;”, Master’s thesis, Chemnitz University of Technology,&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Mathematics, Germany, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM11&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F. D. Freitas, N. Martins, S. L. Varricchio, J. Rommes and F. C. Veliz, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?reload=true&amp;amp;isnumber=6048014&amp;amp;arnumber=5766070 Reduced-Order Transfer Matrices from RLC Network Descriptor Models of Electric Power Grids]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1905-1916, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Wat03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N. Watson and J. Arrillaga, Power Systems Electromagnetic Transients Simulation, IET, London, UK, 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rommes|Joost Rommes]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:kuerschner|Patrick Kürschner]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.nelsonmartins.com/ Nelson Martins]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.ene.unb.br/index.php Francisco D. Freitas]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Power_system_examples&amp;diff=1460</id>
		<title>Power system examples</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Power_system_examples&amp;diff=1460"/>
		<updated>2013-05-29T06:30:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Contact */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified‏‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These first order systems are given in generalized state space form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E\dot{x}(t)=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t)+Du(t),\quad E,A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n},~B\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times m},~C\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times n},~D\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times m}\quad(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and originated at [http://www.cepel.br/ CEPEL] for simulating large &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They come in different sizes and variants, including both SISO and MIMO systems having regular or singular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; matrices. In the latter case the DAEs are of index 1 (except for PI Sections 20--80) and using simple row and column permutations, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E,A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be brought into the form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E=\left[ \begin{array}{cc}I_{n_f}&amp;amp;0\\0&amp;amp;0\end{array}\right],\quad A=\left[ \begin{array}{cc}A_{11}&amp;amp;A_{12}\\A_{21}&amp;amp;A_{22}\end{array}\right],&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; denotes the number of finite eigenvalues in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Lambda(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_{22}\in\mathbb{R}^{n-n_f\times n-n_f}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is regular.&lt;br /&gt;
A complete overview over these systems can be found in table below. The &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; served as benchmark examples for [[Modal truncation|Dominant Pole based Modal Truncation]]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Rom07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kue10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and for a special adaption&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of [[Balanced Truncation]] for the index-1 DAE systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
The table below lists the charateristics of all &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;. The files can be downloaded at [https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; width: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Name&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|New England&lt;br /&gt;
|66 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|ODE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97&lt;br /&gt;
|13251 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/1997&lt;br /&gt;
|13250 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/2007&lt;br /&gt;
|21476	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO8&lt;br /&gt;
|13309	&lt;br /&gt;
|8 	&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO28&lt;br /&gt;
|13251 	&lt;br /&gt;
|28 	&lt;br /&gt;
|28&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO46&lt;br /&gt;
|13250	&lt;br /&gt;
|46	&lt;br /&gt;
|46&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Juba5723&lt;br /&gt;
|40337 	&lt;br /&gt;
|2 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bauru5727&lt;br /&gt;
|40366	&lt;br /&gt;
|2 	&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|zeros_nopss&lt;br /&gt;
|13296	&lt;br /&gt;
|46 	&lt;br /&gt;
|46&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|xingo6u&lt;br /&gt;
|20738	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nopss&lt;br /&gt;
|11685&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_606&lt;br /&gt;
|7135	&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_1142&lt;br /&gt;
|9735&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_1450&lt;br /&gt;
|11305&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_1693&lt;br /&gt;
|13275&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_1998&lt;br /&gt;
|15066&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_2476&lt;br /&gt;
|16861&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_3078&lt;br /&gt;
|21128&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|PI Sections 20-80&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| 	&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
Electrical &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; experience several steady-state and dynamic phenomena that may hinder its reliable, stable operation if not properly designed and operated. Among the dynamic phenomena, &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; angle stability is of major concern, its studies requiring both numerical integration of a stiff set of large, nonlinear differential-algebraic (DAE) equations (for transient stability simulations) and  the eigensolution as well as the use of other Numerical Linear Algebra (NLA) algorithms applied to  the linearized DAE equations of the same large stability models. &#039;&#039;&#039;Power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; with multiple electrical power plants, consumer and industrial loads experience complex electromechanical oscillations, much alike spring-mass mechanical systems  experience mechanical oscillations. These oscillations, when the electric &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; is under stressed conditions, may become poorly-damped or unstable. The analysis of these low-frequency oscillations, as well as their controller-induced damping control, is enhanced by the results from NLA algorithms, all this constituting the study area known as small signal stability. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a pressing need for better utilization of the transmission network and its cost-effective expansions, to reliably carry electric power from the generating plants, driven by several primary energy sources, to the loads. This imposes stricter requirements on network design and &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; control equipment, as well as in the adopted control laws, which coupled with the continental dimensions of modern interconnected &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;, must be studied with the help of simulators employing advanced NLA algorithms. This wiki page contains system models developed when dealing with these NLA issues, with emphasis on the analysis and control of small signal stability.&lt;br /&gt;
Modal analysis has been used for Model Order Reduction (MOR) of lightly damped systems like flexible mechanical structures and RLC networks from either &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; or microprocessor interconnectors. The advent of subspace accelerated dominant pole algorithms in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, made modal reduction effective for better damped systems, such as interconnected &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;, which have eigenvalue clusters in the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.0 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; range and damping ratios between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-0.05&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.25&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Important characteristics of model reduction methods include preserving the dominant dynamics and stability in the Reduced Order Models (ROMs). &lt;br /&gt;
Model reduction is important to the linear control system analysis and design of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; dynamic models. Reduced-order &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; transfer function models are effective in lowering the computational costs of controller design. Once the dominant transfer function poles have been found, the calculation of their associated residues can be obtained by the scalar product of the left and right eigenvectors by the input and output vectors of the transfer function. From the knowledge of the dominant pole-residue set, one can build a transfer function ROM whose accuracy varies with the number of retained poles. See SADPA, SAMDP papers &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Modal analysis is also used in the harmonic distortion analysis of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; networks, mainly in subtransmission and distribution voltage levels. In this application, modal analysis allows determining the main network parameters that impact distortion levels and suggest changes to their effective values among other alternatives. The linear RLC network is modeled unloaded, the conventional electrical generators can be entirely neglected and the nonlinear loads of various nature are modeled as current injections into the network buses -3rd, 5th, 7th, 11th, 13th harmonics of the nominal system frequency (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;50 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;60 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;).  An even more important application for the modal analysis of these large descriptor system RLC network models is the production of ROM for multiport electrical networks, generally in the form of a state-space system whose dimension is considerably smaller than the original system. When these ROMs take the form of RLC networks, they are referred to as RLC reduced equivalents. These ROMs, or equivalents, are used in real-time and off-line simulators for the study of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; high-frequency transient phenomena. They are produced in varying degrees of complexity by using advanced NLA algorithms, this being an area of intense research work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Test systems for small-signal stability analysis of large electric power system networks==&lt;br /&gt;
All test &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; in [https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software], except the PI sections example, are used for &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; small-signal stability studies, and several of them are briefly described in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Such studies include stability analysis, controller design, computation of  MOR, etc. The dynamic phenomena of interest require the detailed modeling of the electrical energy generators (mainly the large sized ones) and other important devices such as flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS). The 3-phase alternating current (AC) network is comprised of nodes (electrical buses, which may be the representation of an entire electrical energy transmission (or distribution) substation, and branches (transmission lines, transformers, series capacitors) and need have only a static model in this application except for the occasional high-power electronic HVDC (High voltage direct current) transmission links and FACTS  devices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The input &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  depends on the study of interest, but the excitation system voltage reference is a frequent input variable in small-signal stability studies. Another reference is the active power setpoint of a rotor-speed regulator. The input signal used in all the above mentioned  files is of Vref type. The output could be an entry of the generalized state &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (state or algebraic variable) or a linear combination of these variables. The generalized states &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are associated with equations of generators, controllers and network. The interconnected network has only algebraic variables, except when FACTS devices are connected. &lt;br /&gt;
The test systems are represented by generalized state-space models, see &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the feed through matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is generally zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Test systems for electromagnetic transients and harmonic distortion studies==&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the harmonic study at hand, a voltage or current source can be assigned as an input. In &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the current injection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a node (also, electrical bus, in &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; terminology) is the input, while the nodal voltage, at the same node, is the  output (variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All transmission lines in the network are modeled by RLC ladder networks, of cascaded RLC PI-circuits, having fixed parameters &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Wat03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The transformers are modeled by series RL circuits. Loads and shunt elements are represented by  series-connected RL (or RC) branch, or just an L (or C). As a consequence, the states &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the dynamic system are either the current through an inductor or the voltage across a capacitor. So matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A, B, C, D, E&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; describe how each circuit element equation, node and voltage are connected, according to the Kirchhoff’s law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software the systems labeled by PI Sections 20--80 are of index-2 ([https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software/PIsections20to80.zip SISO_PI_n.zip and MIMO_PI_n.zip]). The data of these test systems can be converted into index-0 systems by applying a procedure for symbolic math elimination of algebraic variables and redundant state variables. This procedure is detailed in the Appendix C of &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM11&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ([https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software/PIsections20to80.zip SISO_PI_n.zip and MIMO_PI_n.zip]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N. Martins, L. Lima, and H. Pinto, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=486093 Computing dominant poles of power system transfer functions]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.11, no.1, pp.162-170, 1996&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?isnumber=34850&amp;amp;arnumber=1664957&amp;amp;count=60&amp;amp;index=22 Efficient computation of transfer function dominant poles using subspace acceleration]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.21, no.3, pp.1218-1226, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?isnumber=36135&amp;amp;arnumber=1717547&amp;amp;count=61&amp;amp;index=0 Efficient computation of multivariable transfer function dominant poles using subspace acceleration]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.21, no.4, pp.1471-1483, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Rom07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2007-0626-202553/index.htm Methods for eigenvalue problems with applications in model order reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, Ph.D. dissertation, Universiteit&lt;br /&gt;
Utrecht, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://link.aip.org/link/?SCE/30/2137 Computing transfer function dominant poles of large second-order dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot; SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 30, Issue 4, 2008, pp. 2137-2157&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F. Freitas, J. Rommes, and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4558425 Gramian-based reduction method applied to large sparse power system descriptor models]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot; IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1258-1270, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kue10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;P. K&amp;amp;uuml;rschner, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/mpcsc/mitarbeiter/kuerschner/docs/masterthesis.pdf Two-sided eigenvalue methods for modal approximation]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;”, Master’s thesis, Chemnitz University of Technology,&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Mathematics, Germany, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM11&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F. D. Freitas, N. Martins, S. L. Varricchio, J. Rommes and F. C. Veliz, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?reload=true&amp;amp;isnumber=6048014&amp;amp;arnumber=5766070 Reduced-Order Transfer Matrices from RLC Network Descriptor Models of Electric Power Grids]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1905-1916, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Wat03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N. Watson and J. Arrillaga, Power Systems Electromagnetic Transients Simulation, IET, London, UK, 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rommes|Joost Rommes]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:kuerschner|Patrick Kürschner]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.nelsonmartins.com/ Nelson Martins]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://ene.unb.br/~ffreitas Francisco D. Freitas]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Power_system_examples&amp;diff=1459</id>
		<title>Power system examples</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Power_system_examples&amp;diff=1459"/>
		<updated>2013-05-29T06:29:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Contact */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified‏‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These first order systems are given in generalized state space form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E\dot{x}(t)=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t)+Du(t),\quad E,A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n},~B\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times m},~C\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times n},~D\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times m}\quad(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and originated at [http://www.cepel.br/ CEPEL] for simulating large &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They come in different sizes and variants, including both SISO and MIMO systems having regular or singular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; matrices. In the latter case the DAEs are of index 1 (except for PI Sections 20--80) and using simple row and column permutations, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E,A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be brought into the form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E=\left[ \begin{array}{cc}I_{n_f}&amp;amp;0\\0&amp;amp;0\end{array}\right],\quad A=\left[ \begin{array}{cc}A_{11}&amp;amp;A_{12}\\A_{21}&amp;amp;A_{22}\end{array}\right],&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; denotes the number of finite eigenvalues in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Lambda(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_{22}\in\mathbb{R}^{n-n_f\times n-n_f}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is regular.&lt;br /&gt;
A complete overview over these systems can be found in table below. The &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; served as benchmark examples for [[Modal truncation|Dominant Pole based Modal Truncation]]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Rom07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kue10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and for a special adaption&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of [[Balanced Truncation]] for the index-1 DAE systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
The table below lists the charateristics of all &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;. The files can be downloaded at [https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; width: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Name&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|New England&lt;br /&gt;
|66 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|ODE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97&lt;br /&gt;
|13251 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/1997&lt;br /&gt;
|13250 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/2007&lt;br /&gt;
|21476	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO8&lt;br /&gt;
|13309	&lt;br /&gt;
|8 	&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO28&lt;br /&gt;
|13251 	&lt;br /&gt;
|28 	&lt;br /&gt;
|28&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO46&lt;br /&gt;
|13250	&lt;br /&gt;
|46	&lt;br /&gt;
|46&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Juba5723&lt;br /&gt;
|40337 	&lt;br /&gt;
|2 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bauru5727&lt;br /&gt;
|40366	&lt;br /&gt;
|2 	&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|zeros_nopss&lt;br /&gt;
|13296	&lt;br /&gt;
|46 	&lt;br /&gt;
|46&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|xingo6u&lt;br /&gt;
|20738	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nopss&lt;br /&gt;
|11685&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_606&lt;br /&gt;
|7135	&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_1142&lt;br /&gt;
|9735&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_1450&lt;br /&gt;
|11305&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_1693&lt;br /&gt;
|13275&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_1998&lt;br /&gt;
|15066&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_2476&lt;br /&gt;
|16861&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_3078&lt;br /&gt;
|21128&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|PI Sections 20-80&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| 	&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
Electrical &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; experience several steady-state and dynamic phenomena that may hinder its reliable, stable operation if not properly designed and operated. Among the dynamic phenomena, &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; angle stability is of major concern, its studies requiring both numerical integration of a stiff set of large, nonlinear differential-algebraic (DAE) equations (for transient stability simulations) and  the eigensolution as well as the use of other Numerical Linear Algebra (NLA) algorithms applied to  the linearized DAE equations of the same large stability models. &#039;&#039;&#039;Power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; with multiple electrical power plants, consumer and industrial loads experience complex electromechanical oscillations, much alike spring-mass mechanical systems  experience mechanical oscillations. These oscillations, when the electric &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; is under stressed conditions, may become poorly-damped or unstable. The analysis of these low-frequency oscillations, as well as their controller-induced damping control, is enhanced by the results from NLA algorithms, all this constituting the study area known as small signal stability. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a pressing need for better utilization of the transmission network and its cost-effective expansions, to reliably carry electric power from the generating plants, driven by several primary energy sources, to the loads. This imposes stricter requirements on network design and &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; control equipment, as well as in the adopted control laws, which coupled with the continental dimensions of modern interconnected &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;, must be studied with the help of simulators employing advanced NLA algorithms. This wiki page contains system models developed when dealing with these NLA issues, with emphasis on the analysis and control of small signal stability.&lt;br /&gt;
Modal analysis has been used for Model Order Reduction (MOR) of lightly damped systems like flexible mechanical structures and RLC networks from either &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; or microprocessor interconnectors. The advent of subspace accelerated dominant pole algorithms in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, made modal reduction effective for better damped systems, such as interconnected &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;, which have eigenvalue clusters in the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.0 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; range and damping ratios between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-0.05&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.25&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Important characteristics of model reduction methods include preserving the dominant dynamics and stability in the Reduced Order Models (ROMs). &lt;br /&gt;
Model reduction is important to the linear control system analysis and design of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; dynamic models. Reduced-order &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; transfer function models are effective in lowering the computational costs of controller design. Once the dominant transfer function poles have been found, the calculation of their associated residues can be obtained by the scalar product of the left and right eigenvectors by the input and output vectors of the transfer function. From the knowledge of the dominant pole-residue set, one can build a transfer function ROM whose accuracy varies with the number of retained poles. See SADPA, SAMDP papers &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Modal analysis is also used in the harmonic distortion analysis of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; networks, mainly in subtransmission and distribution voltage levels. In this application, modal analysis allows determining the main network parameters that impact distortion levels and suggest changes to their effective values among other alternatives. The linear RLC network is modeled unloaded, the conventional electrical generators can be entirely neglected and the nonlinear loads of various nature are modeled as current injections into the network buses -3rd, 5th, 7th, 11th, 13th harmonics of the nominal system frequency (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;50 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;60 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;).  An even more important application for the modal analysis of these large descriptor system RLC network models is the production of ROM for multiport electrical networks, generally in the form of a state-space system whose dimension is considerably smaller than the original system. When these ROMs take the form of RLC networks, they are referred to as RLC reduced equivalents. These ROMs, or equivalents, are used in real-time and off-line simulators for the study of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; high-frequency transient phenomena. They are produced in varying degrees of complexity by using advanced NLA algorithms, this being an area of intense research work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Test systems for small-signal stability analysis of large electric power system networks==&lt;br /&gt;
All test &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; in [https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software], except the PI sections example, are used for &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; small-signal stability studies, and several of them are briefly described in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Such studies include stability analysis, controller design, computation of  MOR, etc. The dynamic phenomena of interest require the detailed modeling of the electrical energy generators (mainly the large sized ones) and other important devices such as flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS). The 3-phase alternating current (AC) network is comprised of nodes (electrical buses, which may be the representation of an entire electrical energy transmission (or distribution) substation, and branches (transmission lines, transformers, series capacitors) and need have only a static model in this application except for the occasional high-power electronic HVDC (High voltage direct current) transmission links and FACTS  devices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The input &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  depends on the study of interest, but the excitation system voltage reference is a frequent input variable in small-signal stability studies. Another reference is the active power setpoint of a rotor-speed regulator. The input signal used in all the above mentioned  files is of Vref type. The output could be an entry of the generalized state &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (state or algebraic variable) or a linear combination of these variables. The generalized states &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are associated with equations of generators, controllers and network. The interconnected network has only algebraic variables, except when FACTS devices are connected. &lt;br /&gt;
The test systems are represented by generalized state-space models, see &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the feed through matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is generally zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Test systems for electromagnetic transients and harmonic distortion studies==&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the harmonic study at hand, a voltage or current source can be assigned as an input. In &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the current injection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a node (also, electrical bus, in &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; terminology) is the input, while the nodal voltage, at the same node, is the  output (variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All transmission lines in the network are modeled by RLC ladder networks, of cascaded RLC PI-circuits, having fixed parameters &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Wat03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The transformers are modeled by series RL circuits. Loads and shunt elements are represented by  series-connected RL (or RC) branch, or just an L (or C). As a consequence, the states &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the dynamic system are either the current through an inductor or the voltage across a capacitor. So matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A, B, C, D, E&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; describe how each circuit element equation, node and voltage are connected, according to the Kirchhoff’s law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software the systems labeled by PI Sections 20--80 are of index-2 ([https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software/PIsections20to80.zip SISO_PI_n.zip and MIMO_PI_n.zip]). The data of these test systems can be converted into index-0 systems by applying a procedure for symbolic math elimination of algebraic variables and redundant state variables. This procedure is detailed in the Appendix C of &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM11&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ([https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software/PIsections20to80.zip SISO_PI_n.zip and MIMO_PI_n.zip]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N. Martins, L. Lima, and H. Pinto, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=486093 Computing dominant poles of power system transfer functions]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.11, no.1, pp.162-170, 1996&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?isnumber=34850&amp;amp;arnumber=1664957&amp;amp;count=60&amp;amp;index=22 Efficient computation of transfer function dominant poles using subspace acceleration]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.21, no.3, pp.1218-1226, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?isnumber=36135&amp;amp;arnumber=1717547&amp;amp;count=61&amp;amp;index=0 Efficient computation of multivariable transfer function dominant poles using subspace acceleration]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.21, no.4, pp.1471-1483, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Rom07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2007-0626-202553/index.htm Methods for eigenvalue problems with applications in model order reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, Ph.D. dissertation, Universiteit&lt;br /&gt;
Utrecht, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://link.aip.org/link/?SCE/30/2137 Computing transfer function dominant poles of large second-order dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot; SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 30, Issue 4, 2008, pp. 2137-2157&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F. Freitas, J. Rommes, and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4558425 Gramian-based reduction method applied to large sparse power system descriptor models]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot; IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1258-1270, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kue10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;P. K&amp;amp;uuml;rschner, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/mpcsc/mitarbeiter/kuerschner/docs/masterthesis.pdf Two-sided eigenvalue methods for modal approximation]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;”, Master’s thesis, Chemnitz University of Technology,&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Mathematics, Germany, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM11&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F. D. Freitas, N. Martins, S. L. Varricchio, J. Rommes and F. C. Veliz, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?reload=true&amp;amp;isnumber=6048014&amp;amp;arnumber=5766070 Reduced-Order Transfer Matrices from RLC Network Descriptor Models of Electric Power Grids]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1905-1916, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Wat03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N. Watson and J. Arrillaga, Power Systems Electromagnetic Transients Simulation, IET, London, UK, 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rommes|Joost Rommes]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:kuerschner|Patrick Kürschner]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.nelsonmartins.com/ Nelson Martins]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[www.ene.unb.br/~ffreitas Francisco D. Freitas]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Power_system_examples&amp;diff=1456</id>
		<title>Power system examples</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Power_system_examples&amp;diff=1456"/>
		<updated>2013-05-28T12:48:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Contact */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:benchmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:time invariant]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified‏‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These first order systems are given in generalized state space form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E\dot{x}(t)=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t)+Du(t),\quad E,A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n},~B\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times m},~C\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times n},~D\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times m}\quad(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and originated at [http://www.cepel.br/ CEPEL] for simulating large &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They come in different sizes and variants, including both SISO and MIMO systems having regular or singular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; matrices. In the latter case the DAEs are of index 1 (except for PI Sections 20--80) and using simple row and column permutations, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E,A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be brought into the form&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E=\left[ \begin{array}{cc}I_{n_f}&amp;amp;0\\0&amp;amp;0\end{array}\right],\quad A=\left[ \begin{array}{cc}A_{11}&amp;amp;A_{12}\\A_{21}&amp;amp;A_{22}\end{array}\right],&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; denotes the number of finite eigenvalues in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Lambda(A,E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_{22}\in\mathbb{R}^{n-n_f\times n-n_f}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is regular.&lt;br /&gt;
A complete overview over these systems can be found in table below. The &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; served as benchmark examples for [[Modal truncation|Dominant Pole based Modal Truncation]]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Rom07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kue10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and for a special adaption&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of [[Balanced Truncation]] for the index-1 DAE systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data==&lt;br /&gt;
The table below lists the charateristics of all &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;. The files can be downloaded at [https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; width: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Name&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|New England&lt;br /&gt;
|66 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|ODE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97&lt;br /&gt;
|13251 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/1997&lt;br /&gt;
|13250 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/2007&lt;br /&gt;
|21476	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO8&lt;br /&gt;
|13309	&lt;br /&gt;
|8 	&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO28&lt;br /&gt;
|13251 	&lt;br /&gt;
|28 	&lt;br /&gt;
|28&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|BIPS/97,MIMO46&lt;br /&gt;
|13250	&lt;br /&gt;
|46	&lt;br /&gt;
|46&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Juba5723&lt;br /&gt;
|40337 	&lt;br /&gt;
|2 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bauru5727&lt;br /&gt;
|40366	&lt;br /&gt;
|2 	&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|zeros_nopss&lt;br /&gt;
|13296	&lt;br /&gt;
|46 	&lt;br /&gt;
|46&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|xingo6u&lt;br /&gt;
|20738	&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nopss&lt;br /&gt;
|11685&lt;br /&gt;
|1 	&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_606&lt;br /&gt;
|7135	&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_1142&lt;br /&gt;
|9735&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips98_1450&lt;br /&gt;
|11305&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_1693&lt;br /&gt;
|13275&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_1998&lt;br /&gt;
|15066&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_2476&lt;br /&gt;
|16861&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bips07_3078&lt;br /&gt;
|21128&lt;br /&gt;
|4	&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|PI Sections 20-80&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| 	&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|DAE&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
Electrical &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; experience several steady-state and dynamic phenomena that may hinder its reliable, stable operation if not properly designed and operated. Among the dynamic phenomena, &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; angle stability is of major concern, its studies requiring both numerical integration of a stiff set of large, nonlinear differential-algebraic (DAE) equations (for transient stability simulations) and  the eigensolution as well as the use of other Numerical Linear Algebra (NLA) algorithms applied to  the linearized DAE equations of the same large stability models. &#039;&#039;&#039;Power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; with multiple electrical power plants, consumer and industrial loads experience complex electromechanical oscillations, much alike spring-mass mechanical systems  experience mechanical oscillations. These oscillations, when the electric &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; is under stressed conditions, may become poorly-damped or unstable. The analysis of these low-frequency oscillations, as well as their controller-induced damping control, is enhanced by the results from NLA algorithms, all this constituting the study area known as small signal stability. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a pressing need for better utilization of the transmission network and its cost-effective expansions, to reliably carry electric power from the generating plants, driven by several primary energy sources, to the loads. This imposes stricter requirements on network design and &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; control equipment, as well as in the adopted control laws, which coupled with the continental dimensions of modern interconnected &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;, must be studied with the help of simulators employing advanced NLA algorithms. This wiki page contains system models developed when dealing with these NLA issues, with emphasis on the analysis and control of small signal stability.&lt;br /&gt;
Modal analysis has been used for Model Order Reduction (MOR) of lightly damped systems like flexible mechanical structures and RLC networks from either &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; or microprocessor interconnectors. The advent of subspace accelerated dominant pole algorithms in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, made modal reduction effective for better damped systems, such as interconnected &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039;, which have eigenvalue clusters in the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2.0 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; range and damping ratios between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-0.05&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.25&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Important characteristics of model reduction methods include preserving the dominant dynamics and stability in the Reduced Order Models (ROMs). &lt;br /&gt;
Model reduction is important to the linear control system analysis and design of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; dynamic models. Reduced-order &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; transfer function models are effective in lowering the computational costs of controller design. Once the dominant transfer function poles have been found, the calculation of their associated residues can be obtained by the scalar product of the left and right eigenvectors by the input and output vectors of the transfer function. From the knowledge of the dominant pole-residue set, one can build a transfer function ROM whose accuracy varies with the number of retained poles. See SADPA, SAMDP papers &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Modal analysis is also used in the harmonic distortion analysis of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; networks, mainly in subtransmission and distribution voltage levels. In this application, modal analysis allows determining the main network parameters that impact distortion levels and suggest changes to their effective values among other alternatives. The linear RLC network is modeled unloaded, the conventional electrical generators can be entirely neglected and the nonlinear loads of various nature are modeled as current injections into the network buses -3rd, 5th, 7th, 11th, 13th harmonics of the nominal system frequency (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;50 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;60 Hz&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;).  An even more important application for the modal analysis of these large descriptor system RLC network models is the production of ROM for multiport electrical networks, generally in the form of a state-space system whose dimension is considerably smaller than the original system. When these ROMs take the form of RLC networks, they are referred to as RLC reduced equivalents. These ROMs, or equivalents, are used in real-time and off-line simulators for the study of &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; high-frequency transient phenomena. They are produced in varying degrees of complexity by using advanced NLA algorithms, this being an area of intense research work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Test systems for small-signal stability analysis of large electric power system networks==&lt;br /&gt;
All test &#039;&#039;&#039;power systems&#039;&#039;&#039; in [https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software], except the PI sections example, are used for &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; small-signal stability studies, and several of them are briefly described in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Such studies include stability analysis, controller design, computation of  MOR, etc. The dynamic phenomena of interest require the detailed modeling of the electrical energy generators (mainly the large sized ones) and other important devices such as flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS). The 3-phase alternating current (AC) network is comprised of nodes (electrical buses, which may be the representation of an entire electrical energy transmission (or distribution) substation, and branches (transmission lines, transformers, series capacitors) and need have only a static model in this application except for the occasional high-power electronic HVDC (High voltage direct current) transmission links and FACTS  devices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The input &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  depends on the study of interest, but the excitation system voltage reference is a frequent input variable in small-signal stability studies. Another reference is the active power setpoint of a rotor-speed regulator. The input signal used in all the above mentioned  files is of Vref type. The output could be an entry of the generalized state &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (state or algebraic variable) or a linear combination of these variables. The generalized states &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are associated with equations of generators, controllers and network. The interconnected network has only algebraic variables, except when FACTS devices are connected. &lt;br /&gt;
The test systems are represented by generalized state-space models, see &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the feed through matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is generally zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Test systems for electromagnetic transients and harmonic distortion studies==&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the harmonic study at hand, a voltage or current source can be assigned as an input. In &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the current injection &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a node (also, electrical bus, in &#039;&#039;&#039;power system&#039;&#039;&#039; terminology) is the input, while the nodal voltage, at the same node, is the  output (variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All transmission lines in the network are modeled by RLC ladder networks, of cascaded RLC PI-circuits, having fixed parameters &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Wat03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The transformers are modeled by series RL circuits. Loads and shunt elements are represented by  series-connected RL (or RC) branch, or just an L (or C). As a consequence, the states &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the dynamic system are either the current through an inductor or the voltage across a capacitor. So matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A, B, C, D, E&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; describe how each circuit element equation, node and voltage are connected, according to the Kirchhoff’s law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software the systems labeled by PI Sections 20--80 are of index-2 ([https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software/PIsections20to80.zip SISO_PI_n.zip and MIMO_PI_n.zip]). The data of these test systems can be converted into index-0 systems by applying a procedure for symbolic math elimination of algebraic variables and redundant state variables. This procedure is detailed in the Appendix C of &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM11&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ([https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/software/PIsections20to80.zip SISO_PI_n.zip and MIMO_PI_n.zip]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarLP96&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N. Martins, L. Lima, and H. Pinto, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=486093 Computing dominant poles of power system transfer functions]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.11, no.1, pp.162-170, 1996&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?isnumber=34850&amp;amp;arnumber=1664957&amp;amp;count=60&amp;amp;index=22 Efficient computation of transfer function dominant poles using subspace acceleration]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.21, no.3, pp.1218-1226, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM06b&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?isnumber=36135&amp;amp;arnumber=1717547&amp;amp;count=61&amp;amp;index=0 Efficient computation of multivariable transfer function dominant poles using subspace acceleration]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Transactions on&lt;br /&gt;
Power Systems, vol.21, no.4, pp.1471-1483, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Rom07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2007-0626-202553/index.htm Methods for eigenvalue problems with applications in model order reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, Ph.D. dissertation, Universiteit&lt;br /&gt;
Utrecht, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RomM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. Rommes and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://link.aip.org/link/?SCE/30/2137 Computing transfer function dominant poles of large second-order dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot; SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 30, Issue 4, 2008, pp. 2137-2157&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM08&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F. Freitas, J. Rommes, and N. Martins, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4558425 Gramian-based reduction method applied to large sparse power system descriptor models]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot; IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1258-1270, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kue10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;P. K&amp;amp;uuml;rschner, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/mpcsc/mitarbeiter/kuerschner/docs/masterthesis.pdf Two-sided eigenvalue methods for modal approximation]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;”, Master’s thesis, Chemnitz University of Technology,&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Mathematics, Germany, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FreRM11&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F. D. Freitas, N. Martins, S. L. Varricchio, J. Rommes and F. C. Veliz, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?reload=true&amp;amp;isnumber=6048014&amp;amp;arnumber=5766070 Reduced-Order Transfer Matrices from RLC Network Descriptor Models of Electric Power Grids]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1905-1916, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Wat03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N. Watson and J. Arrillaga, Power Systems Electromagnetic Transients Simulation, IET, London, UK, 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rommes|Joost Rommes]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:kuerschner|Patrick Kürschner]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.nelsonmartins.com/ Nelson Martins]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Francisco D. Freitas&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=User:Rommes&amp;diff=1455</id>
		<title>User:Rommes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=User:Rommes&amp;diff=1455"/>
		<updated>2013-05-28T12:46:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Joost Rommes &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integral Project Manager&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
NXP Semiconductors &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Netherlands&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
E-Mail: rommes@gmail.com&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=User:Rommes&amp;diff=1454</id>
		<title>User:Rommes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=User:Rommes&amp;diff=1454"/>
		<updated>2013-05-28T12:45:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: Created page with &amp;quot;Joost Rommes &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;  Industrial Mathematician at NXP Semiconductors &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; The Netherlands  E-Mail: rommes@gmail.com&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Joost Rommes &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Industrial Mathematician at NXP Semiconductors &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Netherlands&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
E-Mail: rommes@gmail.com&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://sites.google.com/site/rommes/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Moment-matching_PMOR_method&amp;diff=1412</id>
		<title>Moment-matching PMOR method</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Moment-matching_PMOR_method&amp;diff=1412"/>
		<updated>2013-05-22T08:34:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Description */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:parametric]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The method introduced here is described in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daniel04&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, which is an extension of the [[moment-matching method]] for nonparametric systems (see &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng13a&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;oda98&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; for moment-matching MOR). The method is applicable for linear parametrized systems, either in frequency domain or in time domain. For example, the parametric system in frequency domain:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(E_0+s_1 E+s_2E_2+\ldots +s_pE_p)x=Bu(s_1,\ldots,s_p), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y=Cx,    \quad \quad \quad \quad (1)           &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;                                              &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_1=j2 \pi f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the frequency domain variable, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the frequency. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_2, s_3, \ldots, s_{p}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the parameters of the system. They can be any scalar functions of some source parameters, like &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_2=e^t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is time, or combinations of several physical (geometrical) parameters like &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_2=\rho v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are two independent physical (geometrical) parameters. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)\in \mathbb{R}^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the state vector, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u \in \mathbb{R}^{d_I}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y \in&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbb{R}^{d_O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the inputs and outputs of the&lt;br /&gt;
system, respectively. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To obtain the reduced model in (2), a [[Projection_based_MOR|projection]] matrix &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times r}, r\ll n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has to be computed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V^T(E_0+s_1E_1+s_2E_2+\ldots +s_pE_p)Vx=V^TBu(s_1,\ldots,s_p), &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y=CVx.  \quad \quad \quad \quad  \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is derived by orthogonalizing a number of moment&lt;br /&gt;
matrices of the system in (1) as follows, see &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daniel04&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\tilde{E}=E_0+s_1^0E_1+s_2^0E_2+\cdots+s_p^0E_p,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B_M=\tilde{E}^{-1}B, M_i=-\tilde{E}^{-1}E_i,i=1,2,\ldots,p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &lt;br /&gt;
we can expand &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (1) at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_1, s_2, \ldots, s_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_0=[s_1^0,s_2^0,\cdots,s_p^0]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as below,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 x=[I-(\sigma_1M_1+\ldots +\sigma_pM_p)]^{-1}B_Mu(s_1,\ldots,s_p)&lt;br /&gt;
 =\sum\limits_{i=0}^{\infty}(\sigma_1M_1+\ldots+\sigma_pM_p)^iB_Mu(s_1,\ldots,s_p).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma_i=s_i-s_i^0, i=1,2,\ldots,p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We call the coefficients&lt;br /&gt;
in the above series expansion moment matrices of the parametrized&lt;br /&gt;
system, i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B_M, M_1B_M, \ldots, M_pB_M, M_1^2B_M, (M_1M_2+M_2M_1)B_M, \ldots, (M_1M_p+M_pM_1)B_M, M_p^2B_M, M_1^3B_M, \ldots&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The corresponding moments of the transfer function are those moment&lt;br /&gt;
matrices multiplied by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the left. The matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be&lt;br /&gt;
generated by first explicitly computing some of the moment matrices&lt;br /&gt;
and then orthogonalizing them as suggested in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daniel04&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
The resulting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is desired to expand the subspace:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\mathop{\mathrm{range}}\{V\}=\mathop{\mathrm{span}}\{B_M, \ M_1B_M,\ldots, M_pB_M,\ M_1^2B_M, \, (M_1M_2+M_2M_1)B_M, \ldots, (M_1M_p+M_pM_1)B_M, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 M_p^2B_M, M_1^3B_M,\ldots, M_1^rB_M, \ldots,M_p^rB_M \}.        \quad \quad \quad   \quad      (3)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; does not really span the whole subspace, because the&lt;br /&gt;
latterly computed vectors in the subspace become linearly dependent&lt;br /&gt;
due to numerical instability. Therefore, with this matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; one&lt;br /&gt;
cannot get an accurate reduced model which matches all the moments&lt;br /&gt;
algebraically included in the subspace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of directly computing the moment matrices in (3), a&lt;br /&gt;
numerically robust method is proposed in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; ( the&lt;br /&gt;
detailed algorithm is described in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fengXX&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; ), which combines&lt;br /&gt;
the recursion in (5) with the modified Gram-Schmidt&lt;br /&gt;
process to implicitly compute the moment matrices. The computed &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
is actually an orthonormal basis of the subspace as below,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\mathop{\mathrm{range}}\{V\}=\mathop{\mathrm{span}}\{R_0, R_1,\ldots, R_r \}.  \quad \quad \quad  \quad (4)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R_0 =[B_M],&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_1=[M_1R_0,\ldots, M_pR_0], &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_2=[M_1R_1,\ldots, M_pR_1], \quad \quad \quad \quad (5) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;                      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vdots,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_r=[M_1R_{r-1},\ldots, M_pR_{r-1}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vdots.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the numerical stability properties of&lt;br /&gt;
the repeated modified Gram-Schmidt process employed in&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fengXX&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, the reduced model derived from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
in (4) is computed in a numerically stable and accurate way. Applications of the method in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fengXX&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; to the parametric models [[Gyroscope]], [[Silicon nitride membrane]], and [[Microthruster Unit]], can be found in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng13&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daniel04&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Daniel, O. C. Siong, L. S. Chay, K. H. Lee, and J.~White. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2004.826583 A multiparameter moment-matching model-reduction approach for generating geometrically parameterized interconnect performance models]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst, 22(5): 678--693, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Feng and P. Benner, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pamm.200700749 A Robust Algorithm for Parametric Model Order Reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, In Proc. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (ICIAM 2007), 7(1): 10215.01--02, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fengXX&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Feng and P. Benner, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=64CF520F4D47C5E63F6BA178288BE18F?doi=10.1.1.154.4365&amp;amp;rep=rep1&amp;amp;type=pdf A robust algorithm for parametric model order reduction based on implicit moment matching]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, submitted.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng13&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Feng, P. Benner, J.G Korvink, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nme.4449 Subspace recycling accelerates the parametric macromodeling of MEMS]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 94(1): 84-110, 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng13a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Feng, P. Benner, and J.G Korvink, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/%2010.1002/9783527647132.ch3 System-level modeling of MEMS by means of model order reduction (mathematical approximation)--mathematical background]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. In T. Bechtold, G. Schrag, and L. Feng, editors, System-Level Modeling of MEMS, Advanced Micro &amp;amp; Nanosystems. ISBN 978-3-527-31903-9, Wiley-VCH, 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;oda98&amp;quot;&amp;gt;A. Odabasioglu, M. Celik, and L. T. Pileggi, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD.1997.643366 PRIMA: passive reduced-order interconnect macromodeling algorithm]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.,17(8):645--654,1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Krylov_subspace_MOR_methods&amp;diff=1411</id>
		<title>Krylov subspace MOR methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Krylov_subspace_MOR_methods&amp;diff=1411"/>
		<updated>2013-05-22T08:33:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear algebra]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Krylov subspace MOR methods may refer to the [[moment-matching method]] for non-parametric systems or the [[moment-matching PMOR method]] for parametric systems.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Pad%C3%A9_approximation_methods&amp;diff=1410</id>
		<title>Padé approximation methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Pad%C3%A9_approximation_methods&amp;diff=1410"/>
		<updated>2013-05-22T08:32:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear algebra]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This kind of methods are also called the [[Krylov subspace MOR methods]] or the [[moment-matching method]]s.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Moment-matching_PMOR_method&amp;diff=1409</id>
		<title>Moment-matching PMOR method</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Moment-matching_PMOR_method&amp;diff=1409"/>
		<updated>2013-05-22T08:31:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Description */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:parametric]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The method introduced here is described in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daniel04&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, which is an extension of the [[Moment-matching method]] for nonparametric systems (see &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng13a&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;oda98&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; for moment-matching MOR). The method is applicable for linear parametrized systems, either in frequency domain or in time domain. For example, the parametric system in frequency domain:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(E_0+s_1 E+s_2E_2+\ldots +s_pE_p)x=Bu(s_1,\ldots,s_p), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y=Cx,    \quad \quad \quad \quad (1)           &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;                                              &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_1=j2 \pi f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the frequency domain variable, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the frequency. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_2, s_3, \ldots, s_{p}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the parameters of the system. They can be any scalar functions of some source parameters, like &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_2=e^t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is time, or combinations of several physical (geometrical) parameters like &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_2=\rho v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are two independent physical (geometrical) parameters. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)\in \mathbb{R}^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the state vector, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u \in \mathbb{R}^{d_I}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y \in&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbb{R}^{d_O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the inputs and outputs of the&lt;br /&gt;
system, respectively. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To obtain the reduced model in (2), a [[Projection_based_MOR|projection]] matrix &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times r}, r\ll n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has to be computed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V^T(E_0+s_1E_1+s_2E_2+\ldots +s_pE_p)Vx=V^TBu(s_1,\ldots,s_p), &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y=CVx.  \quad \quad \quad \quad  \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is derived by orthogonalizing a number of moment&lt;br /&gt;
matrices of the system in (1) as follows, see &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daniel04&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\tilde{E}=E_0+s_1^0E_1+s_2^0E_2+\cdots+s_p^0E_p,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B_M=\tilde{E}^{-1}B, M_i=-\tilde{E}^{-1}E_i,i=1,2,\ldots,p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &lt;br /&gt;
we can expand &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (1) at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_1, s_2, \ldots, s_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_0=[s_1^0,s_2^0,\cdots,s_p^0]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as below,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 x=[I-(\sigma_1M_1+\ldots +\sigma_pM_p)]^{-1}B_Mu(s_1,\ldots,s_p)&lt;br /&gt;
 =\sum\limits_{i=0}^{\infty}(\sigma_1M_1+\ldots+\sigma_pM_p)^iB_Mu(s_1,\ldots,s_p).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma_i=s_i-s_i^0, i=1,2,\ldots,p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We call the coefficients&lt;br /&gt;
in the above series expansion moment matrices of the parametrized&lt;br /&gt;
system, i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B_M, M_1B_M, \ldots, M_pB_M, M_1^2B_M, (M_1M_2+M_2M_1)B_M, \ldots, (M_1M_p+M_pM_1)B_M, M_p^2B_M, M_1^3B_M, \ldots&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The corresponding moments of the transfer function are those moment&lt;br /&gt;
matrices multiplied by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the left. The matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be&lt;br /&gt;
generated by first explicitly computing some of the moment matrices&lt;br /&gt;
and then orthogonalizing them as suggested in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daniel04&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
The resulting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is desired to expand the subspace:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\mathop{\mathrm{range}}\{V\}=\mathop{\mathrm{span}}\{B_M, \ M_1B_M,\ldots, M_pB_M,\ M_1^2B_M, \, (M_1M_2+M_2M_1)B_M, \ldots, (M_1M_p+M_pM_1)B_M, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 M_p^2B_M, M_1^3B_M,\ldots, M_1^rB_M, \ldots,M_p^rB_M \}.        \quad \quad \quad   \quad      (3)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; does not really span the whole subspace, because the&lt;br /&gt;
latterly computed vectors in the subspace become linearly dependent&lt;br /&gt;
due to numerical instability. Therefore, with this matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; one&lt;br /&gt;
cannot get an accurate reduced model which matches all the moments&lt;br /&gt;
algebraically included in the subspace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of directly computing the moment matrices in (3), a&lt;br /&gt;
numerically robust method is proposed in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; ( the&lt;br /&gt;
detailed algorithm is described in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fengXX&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; ), which combines&lt;br /&gt;
the recursion in (5) with the modified Gram-Schmidt&lt;br /&gt;
process to implicitly compute the moment matrices. The computed &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
is actually an orthonormal basis of the subspace as below,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\mathop{\mathrm{range}}\{V\}=\mathop{\mathrm{span}}\{R_0, R_1,\ldots, R_r \}.  \quad \quad \quad  \quad (4)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R_0 =[B_M],&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_1=[M_1R_0,\ldots, M_pR_0], &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_2=[M_1R_1,\ldots, M_pR_1], \quad \quad \quad \quad (5) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;                      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vdots,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_r=[M_1R_{r-1},\ldots, M_pR_{r-1}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vdots.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the numerical stability properties of&lt;br /&gt;
the repeated modified Gram-Schmidt process employed in&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fengXX&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, the reduced model derived from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
in (4) is computed in a numerically stable and accurate way. Applications of the method in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fengXX&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; to the parametric models [[Gyroscope]], [[Silicon nitride membrane]], and [[Microthruster Unit]], can be found in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng13&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daniel04&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Daniel, O. C. Siong, L. S. Chay, K. H. Lee, and J.~White. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2004.826583 A multiparameter moment-matching model-reduction approach for generating geometrically parameterized interconnect performance models]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst, 22(5): 678--693, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Feng and P. Benner, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pamm.200700749 A Robust Algorithm for Parametric Model Order Reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, In Proc. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (ICIAM 2007), 7(1): 10215.01--02, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fengXX&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Feng and P. Benner, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=64CF520F4D47C5E63F6BA178288BE18F?doi=10.1.1.154.4365&amp;amp;rep=rep1&amp;amp;type=pdf A robust algorithm for parametric model order reduction based on implicit moment matching]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, submitted.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng13&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Feng, P. Benner, J.G Korvink, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nme.4449 Subspace recycling accelerates the parametric macromodeling of MEMS]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 94(1): 84-110, 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng13a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Feng, P. Benner, and J.G Korvink, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/%2010.1002/9783527647132.ch3 System-level modeling of MEMS by means of model order reduction (mathematical approximation)--mathematical background]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. In T. Bechtold, G. Schrag, and L. Feng, editors, System-Level Modeling of MEMS, Advanced Micro &amp;amp; Nanosystems. ISBN 978-3-527-31903-9, Wiley-VCH, 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;oda98&amp;quot;&amp;gt;A. Odabasioglu, M. Celik, and L. T. Pileggi, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD.1997.643366 PRIMA: passive reduced-order interconnect macromodeling algorithm]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.,17(8):645--654,1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Moment-matching_PMOR_method&amp;diff=1408</id>
		<title>Moment-matching PMOR method</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Moment-matching_PMOR_method&amp;diff=1408"/>
		<updated>2013-05-22T08:26:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Description */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:parametric]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The method introduced here is described in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daniel04&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, which is an extension of the [[Moment-matching method]] for nonparametric systems (see &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng13a&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;oda98&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; for moment-matching MOR). The method is applicable for linear parametrized systems, either in frequency domain or in time domain. For example, the parametric system in frequency domain:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(E_0+s_1 E+s_2E_2+\ldots +s_pE_p)x=Bu(s_1,\ldots,s_p), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y=Cx,    \quad \quad \quad \quad (1)           &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;                                              &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_1=j2 \pi f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the frequency domain variable, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the frequency. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_2, s_3, \ldots, s_{p}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the parameters of the system. They can be any scalar functions of some source parameters, like &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_2=e^t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is time, or combinations of several physical (geometrical) parameters like &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_2=\rho v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\rho&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are two independent physical (geometrical) parameters. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(t)\in \mathbb{R}^n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the state vector, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u \in \mathbb{R}^{d_I}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y \in&lt;br /&gt;
\mathbb{R}^{d_O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the inputs and outputs of the&lt;br /&gt;
system, respectively. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To obtain the reduced model in (2), a&lt;br /&gt;
projection matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times r}, r\ll n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has to be computed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V^T(E_0+s_1E_1+s_2E_2+\ldots +s_pE_p)Vx=V^TBu(s_1,\ldots,s_p), &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y=CVx.  \quad \quad \quad \quad  \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is derived by orthogonalizing a number of moment&lt;br /&gt;
matrices of the system in (1) as follows, see &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daniel04&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\tilde{E}=E_0+s_1^0E_1+s_2^0E_2+\cdots+s_p^0E_p,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B_M=\tilde{E}^{-1}B, M_i=-\tilde{E}^{-1}E_i,i=1,2,\ldots,p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &lt;br /&gt;
we can expand &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (1) at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_1, s_2, \ldots, s_p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; around &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_0=[s_1^0,s_2^0,\cdots,s_p^0]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as below,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 x=[I-(\sigma_1M_1+\ldots +\sigma_pM_p)]^{-1}B_Mu(s_1,\ldots,s_p)&lt;br /&gt;
 =\sum\limits_{i=0}^{\infty}(\sigma_1M_1+\ldots+\sigma_pM_p)^iB_Mu(s_1,\ldots,s_p).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma_i=s_i-s_i^0, i=1,2,\ldots,p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We call the coefficients&lt;br /&gt;
in the above series expansion moment matrices of the parametrized&lt;br /&gt;
system, i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B_M, M_1B_M, \ldots, M_pB_M, M_1^2B_M, (M_1M_2+M_2M_1)B_M, \ldots, (M_1M_p+M_pM_1)B_M, M_p^2B_M, M_1^3B_M, \ldots&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The corresponding moments of the transfer function are those moment&lt;br /&gt;
matrices multiplied by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the left. The matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be&lt;br /&gt;
generated by first explicitly computing some of the moment matrices&lt;br /&gt;
and then orthogonalizing them as suggested in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daniel04&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
The resulting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is desired to expand the subspace:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\mathop{\mathrm{range}}\{V\}=\mathop{\mathrm{span}}\{B_M, \ M_1B_M,\ldots, M_pB_M,\ M_1^2B_M, \, (M_1M_2+M_2M_1)B_M, \ldots, (M_1M_p+M_pM_1)B_M, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 M_p^2B_M, M_1^3B_M,\ldots, M_1^rB_M, \ldots,M_p^rB_M \}.        \quad \quad \quad   \quad      (3)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; does not really span the whole subspace, because the&lt;br /&gt;
latterly computed vectors in the subspace become linearly dependent&lt;br /&gt;
due to numerical instability. Therefore, with this matrix &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; one&lt;br /&gt;
cannot get an accurate reduced model which matches all the moments&lt;br /&gt;
algebraically included in the subspace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of directly computing the moment matrices in (3), a&lt;br /&gt;
numerically robust method is proposed in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; ( the&lt;br /&gt;
detailed algorithm is described in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fengXX&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; ), which combines&lt;br /&gt;
the recursion in (5) with the modified Gram-Schmidt&lt;br /&gt;
process to implicitly compute the moment matrices. The computed &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
is actually an orthonormal basis of the subspace as below,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\mathop{\mathrm{range}}\{V\}=\mathop{\mathrm{span}}\{R_0, R_1,\ldots, R_r \}.  \quad \quad \quad  \quad (4)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R_0 =[B_M],&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_1=[M_1R_0,\ldots, M_pR_0], &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_2=[M_1R_1,\ldots, M_pR_1], \quad \quad \quad \quad (5) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;                      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vdots,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R_r=[M_1R_{r-1},\ldots, M_pR_{r-1}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \vdots.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the numerical stability properties of&lt;br /&gt;
the repeated modified Gram-Schmidt process employed in&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fengXX&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, the reduced model derived from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
in (4) is computed in a numerically stable and accurate way. Applications of the method in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fengXX&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; to the parametric models [[Gyroscope]], [[Silicon nitride membrane]], and [[Microthruster Unit]], can be found in &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng13&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daniel04&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Daniel, O. C. Siong, L. S. Chay, K. H. Lee, and J.~White. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2004.826583 A multiparameter moment-matching model-reduction approach for generating geometrically parameterized interconnect performance models]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst, 22(5): 678--693, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng07&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Feng and P. Benner, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pamm.200700749 A Robust Algorithm for Parametric Model Order Reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, In Proc. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (ICIAM 2007), 7(1): 10215.01--02, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fengXX&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Feng and P. Benner, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=64CF520F4D47C5E63F6BA178288BE18F?doi=10.1.1.154.4365&amp;amp;rep=rep1&amp;amp;type=pdf A robust algorithm for parametric model order reduction based on implicit moment matching]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, submitted.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng13&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Feng, P. Benner, J.G Korvink, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nme.4449 Subspace recycling accelerates the parametric macromodeling of MEMS]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 94(1): 84-110, 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feng13a&amp;quot;&amp;gt;L. Feng, P. Benner, and J.G Korvink, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/%2010.1002/9783527647132.ch3 System-level modeling of MEMS by means of model order reduction (mathematical approximation)--mathematical background]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. In T. Bechtold, G. Schrag, and L. Feng, editors, System-Level Modeling of MEMS, Advanced Micro &amp;amp; Nanosystems. ISBN 978-3-527-31903-9, Wiley-VCH, 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;oda98&amp;quot;&amp;gt;A. Odabasioglu, M. Celik, and L. T. Pileggi, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD.1997.643366 PRIMA: passive reduced-order interconnect macromodeling algorithm]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.,17(8):645--654,1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Submission_rules&amp;diff=1395</id>
		<title>Submission rules</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Submission_rules&amp;diff=1395"/>
		<updated>2013-05-03T12:37:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Matrix format for linear non-parametric or parametric affine systems */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__&lt;br /&gt;
The MOR benchmark collection contains benchmarks related to model order reduction. Its goal is to supply the dynamical systems in a computer-readable format  to researchers from different areas. They can then test new algorithms, software, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The collection contains documents and wikipages that are supposed to be processed by a human being and data files that are supposed to be read automatically by software. As a result, with minor exceptions, the rules concerning documents have a recommendation status, and the rules concerning data files are obligatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start with describing the benchmark creation process, then we present the description of what content is needed on the wikipages as well as the supplement documents, and finally we describe the data files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Benchmark Creation==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone who has an example that could be relevant for this MOR benchmark collection can add it to the collection, after the editors decide that it is suitable for our collection. In order to be allowed to create a benchmark, one has to write an email to the editors asking for access to the wiki describing the benchmark to be created. If the editors accept the benchmark they grant access to the authors and create an empty page for the benchmark. The submitter needs to then edit the created wikipage that links to the data files as well as to further explanatory documents, if necessary. See 2.1 for the content requirement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Content Rules==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The supplementary documents as well as the wikipage may be written by different authors, however each individual document should be written according to conventional scientific practice, that is, it describes the matters in such a way that, at least in principle, anyone could reproduce the results presented. The authors should understand that the document may be read by people from quite different disciplines. Hence, abbreviations should be avoided or at least explained and references to the background ideas should be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Content Requirement===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of this content could be included in the wiki page directly, is however not necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
One should describe the origin of the dynamic system and its relevance to the application area. It is important to present the mathematical model, the meaning of the inputs and outputs, and the desired behavior from the application viewpoint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following points should be considered and if possible included in your benchmark:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The purpose of the model should be explained clearly. (For instance, simulation, iterative system design, feedback control design, ...)&lt;br /&gt;
* Why should the model be reduced at all? (For instance, reducing simulation time, reducing implementation effort in observers, controllers...)&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the QUALITATIVE requirements to the reduced model? What variables are to be approximated well? Is the step response to be approximated or is it the bode plot? What are typical input signals? (Some systems are driven by a step function and nothing else, others are driven by a wide variety of input signals, others are used in closed loops and can cause instabilities, although being stable themselves.)&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the QUANTITATIVE requirements to the reduced model? Best would be if the authors of any individual model can suggest some cost functions (performance indices) to be used for the comparison. These can be in time domain, or in frequency domain (including bandwidth), or both.&lt;br /&gt;
* Are there limits of input and state variables known? (application related or generally)? What are the physical limits where the model becomes useless/false? If known a-priori: Out of the technically typical input signals, which one will cause &amp;quot;the most nonlinear&amp;quot; behavior?&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parameters are included in the model, are they physical parameters or geometrical parameters.&lt;br /&gt;
* Is the system linear or nonlinear? Is it a first or a second order system? &lt;br /&gt;
* When the model is used to test, e.g. an algorithm, can some of the parameters in the model be fixed, such that the model includes fewer parameters, which makes the testing easier?&lt;br /&gt;
* If possible, the source code which generates the model is encouraged to be provided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We stress the importance to describe the software employed, as well as its related options. For example, if the model is generated from ANSYS, the software ANSYS is better to be mentioned. If necessary, please also describe some related options like boundary conditions, initial conditions, and other parameters which need to be assigned when generating the model. Please go to the benchmark webpage [[Silicon nitride membrane]] for a reference. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If the dynamic system is obtained from partial differential equations, then the information about material properties, geometrical data, initial and boundary conditions should be given. The exception to this rule is the case when the original model comes from industry. In this case, if trade secrets are tied with the information mentioned, it may be kept hidden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The authors are encouraged to produce several dynamic models of different dimensions in order to provide an opportunity to apply different software and to research scalability issues. If an author has an interactive page on his/her server to generate benchmarks, a link to this page is welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The dynamic system may be obtained by means of compound matrices, for example, when the second-order system is converted to first-order. In this case, the document should describe such a transformation but in the data file the original and not the compound matrices should be given. This allows to research other ways of model reduction of the original system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above information is in a general sense. Therefore, some items may not be applicable to certain benchmarks. However, it is recommended that the items that apply to the benchmark provided should be fully considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Additional Content===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will typically be given in form of a document which we restrict to  the following types: *.pdf, *.gif, *.jpeg, *.jpg, *.png,. This documents should include author names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The solution of the original benchmark that contains sample outputs for the usual input signals. Plots and numerical values of time and frequency response. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors, singular values, poles, zeros, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
# Model reduction and its results as compared to the original system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Description of any other related results.&lt;br /&gt;
# We stress the importance of describing the software employed as well as its related options.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data Files==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the numerical data for the collection can be considered as a list of matrices, a vector being a m x 1 matrix. As a result, there should be a naming convention for the matrices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Naming convention===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a state vector, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of parameters in the system, if any.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the two cases of a linear system of first and second differential order, the naming convention should be written as follows&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
    E (\mu) \dot x &amp;amp;= A(\mu) x + B(\mu)u\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) u  &lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
    M(\mu) \ddot x + E(\mu) \dot x + K(\mu) x &amp;amp;= B(\mu)u\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) u&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We recommend to use for nonlinear models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
   M(\mu) \ddot x + E(\mu) \dot x + K(\mu) x &amp;amp;= B(\mu) u + F(\mu) g(x,u,\mu)\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) f(x, u,\mu)&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An author can use another notation in the case when the convention above is not appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Matrix format for linear non-parametric or parametric affine systems===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the linear non-parametric systems and the parametric affine systems, the matrices of the systems are constant matrices. Such matrices should be written in the Matrix Market format as described at http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A file for a matrix should be named as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    problem_name.matrix_name&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is no file for a matrix, it is assumed to be identity for the E matrix and 0 for the D matrix.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All matrix files for a given problem should be compressed in a single zip or tar.gz archive, there should be a folder in the archive which is named with &amp;quot;problem_name&amp;quot; or with the abbreviated problem name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Matrix format for nonlinear or parametric non-affine systems===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the parametric non-affine systems, or nonlinear systems, the system matrices are coupled with the parameters and/or the state vectors. In this case, the system matrices should be analytically described if possible. For example, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A(1,1)=x_1^2+x_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A(i,2)=\mu_i^3 x_i, i=1,2,\ldots m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, etc., where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the parameters, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;th entry in the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If the system matrices are too complicated to be described analytically, or in plain text, the source code to generate the matrices should be available (or at  &lt;br /&gt;
least should be sent after contacting the responsible person).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Younès Chahlaoui and Paul Van Dooren. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://eprints.ma.man.ac.uk/1040/01/covered/MIMS_ep2008_22.pdf A collection of benchmark examples for model reduction of linear time invariant dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;; SLICOT Working Note 2002-2: February 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmark examples for model reduction of linear time invariant dynamical systems: http://www.icm.tu-bs.de/NICONET/benchmodred.html&lt;br /&gt;
* Oberwolfach Model Reduction Benchmark Collection: http://portal.uni-freiburg.de/imteksimulation/downloads/benchmark&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Editors: &lt;br /&gt;
{{editors}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Submission_rules&amp;diff=1394</id>
		<title>Submission rules</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Submission_rules&amp;diff=1394"/>
		<updated>2013-05-03T12:37:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Naming convention */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__&lt;br /&gt;
The MOR benchmark collection contains benchmarks related to model order reduction. Its goal is to supply the dynamical systems in a computer-readable format  to researchers from different areas. They can then test new algorithms, software, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The collection contains documents and wikipages that are supposed to be processed by a human being and data files that are supposed to be read automatically by software. As a result, with minor exceptions, the rules concerning documents have a recommendation status, and the rules concerning data files are obligatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start with describing the benchmark creation process, then we present the description of what content is needed on the wikipages as well as the supplement documents, and finally we describe the data files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Benchmark Creation==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone who has an example that could be relevant for this MOR benchmark collection can add it to the collection, after the editors decide that it is suitable for our collection. In order to be allowed to create a benchmark, one has to write an email to the editors asking for access to the wiki describing the benchmark to be created. If the editors accept the benchmark they grant access to the authors and create an empty page for the benchmark. The submitter needs to then edit the created wikipage that links to the data files as well as to further explanatory documents, if necessary. See 2.1 for the content requirement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Content Rules==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The supplementary documents as well as the wikipage may be written by different authors, however each individual document should be written according to conventional scientific practice, that is, it describes the matters in such a way that, at least in principle, anyone could reproduce the results presented. The authors should understand that the document may be read by people from quite different disciplines. Hence, abbreviations should be avoided or at least explained and references to the background ideas should be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Content Requirement===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of this content could be included in the wiki page directly, is however not necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
One should describe the origin of the dynamic system and its relevance to the application area. It is important to present the mathematical model, the meaning of the inputs and outputs, and the desired behavior from the application viewpoint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following points should be considered and if possible included in your benchmark:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The purpose of the model should be explained clearly. (For instance, simulation, iterative system design, feedback control design, ...)&lt;br /&gt;
* Why should the model be reduced at all? (For instance, reducing simulation time, reducing implementation effort in observers, controllers...)&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the QUALITATIVE requirements to the reduced model? What variables are to be approximated well? Is the step response to be approximated or is it the bode plot? What are typical input signals? (Some systems are driven by a step function and nothing else, others are driven by a wide variety of input signals, others are used in closed loops and can cause instabilities, although being stable themselves.)&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the QUANTITATIVE requirements to the reduced model? Best would be if the authors of any individual model can suggest some cost functions (performance indices) to be used for the comparison. These can be in time domain, or in frequency domain (including bandwidth), or both.&lt;br /&gt;
* Are there limits of input and state variables known? (application related or generally)? What are the physical limits where the model becomes useless/false? If known a-priori: Out of the technically typical input signals, which one will cause &amp;quot;the most nonlinear&amp;quot; behavior?&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parameters are included in the model, are they physical parameters or geometrical parameters.&lt;br /&gt;
* Is the system linear or nonlinear? Is it a first or a second order system? &lt;br /&gt;
* When the model is used to test, e.g. an algorithm, can some of the parameters in the model be fixed, such that the model includes fewer parameters, which makes the testing easier?&lt;br /&gt;
* If possible, the source code which generates the model is encouraged to be provided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We stress the importance to describe the software employed, as well as its related options. For example, if the model is generated from ANSYS, the software ANSYS is better to be mentioned. If necessary, please also describe some related options like boundary conditions, initial conditions, and other parameters which need to be assigned when generating the model. Please go to the benchmark webpage [[Silicon nitride membrane]] for a reference. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If the dynamic system is obtained from partial differential equations, then the information about material properties, geometrical data, initial and boundary conditions should be given. The exception to this rule is the case when the original model comes from industry. In this case, if trade secrets are tied with the information mentioned, it may be kept hidden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The authors are encouraged to produce several dynamic models of different dimensions in order to provide an opportunity to apply different software and to research scalability issues. If an author has an interactive page on his/her server to generate benchmarks, a link to this page is welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The dynamic system may be obtained by means of compound matrices, for example, when the second-order system is converted to first-order. In this case, the document should describe such a transformation but in the data file the original and not the compound matrices should be given. This allows to research other ways of model reduction of the original system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above information is in a general sense. Therefore, some items may not be applicable to certain benchmarks. However, it is recommended that the items that apply to the benchmark provided should be fully considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Additional Content===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will typically be given in form of a document which we restrict to  the following types: *.pdf, *.gif, *.jpeg, *.jpg, *.png,. This documents should include author names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The solution of the original benchmark that contains sample outputs for the usual input signals. Plots and numerical values of time and frequency response. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors, singular values, poles, zeros, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
# Model reduction and its results as compared to the original system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Description of any other related results.&lt;br /&gt;
# We stress the importance of describing the software employed as well as its related options.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data Files==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the numerical data for the collection can be considered as a list of matrices, a vector being a m x 1 matrix. As a result, there should be a naming convention for the matrices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Naming convention===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a state vector, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of parameters in the system, if any.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the two cases of a linear system of first and second differential order, the naming convention should be written as follows&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
    E (\mu) \dot x &amp;amp;= A(\mu) x + B(\mu)u\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) u  &lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
    M(\mu) \ddot x + E(\mu) \dot x + K(\mu) x &amp;amp;= B(\mu)u\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) u&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We recommend to use for nonlinear models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
   M(\mu) \ddot x + E(\mu) \dot x + K(\mu) x &amp;amp;= B(\mu) u + F(\mu) g(x,u,\mu)\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) f(x, u,\mu)&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An author can use another notation in the case when the convention above is not appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Matrix format for linear non-parametric or parametric affine systems===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the linear non-parametric systems and the parametric affine systems, the matrices of the systems are constant matrices. Such matrices should be written in the Matrix Market format as described at http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A file with a matrix should be named as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    problem_name.matrix_name&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is no file for a matrix, it is assumed to be identity for the E matrix and 0 for the D matrix.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All matrix files for a given problem should be compressed in a single zip or tar.gz archive, there should be a folder in the archive which is named with &amp;quot;problem_name&amp;quot; or with the abbreviated problem name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Matrix format for nonlinear or parametric non-affine systems===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the parametric non-affine systems, or nonlinear systems, the system matrices are coupled with the parameters and/or the state vectors. In this case, the system matrices should be analytically described if possible. For example, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A(1,1)=x_1^2+x_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A(i,2)=\mu_i^3 x_i, i=1,2,\ldots m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, etc., where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the parameters, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;th entry in the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If the system matrices are too complicated to be described analytically, or in plain text, the source code to generate the matrices should be available (or at  &lt;br /&gt;
least should be sent after contacting the responsible person).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Younès Chahlaoui and Paul Van Dooren. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://eprints.ma.man.ac.uk/1040/01/covered/MIMS_ep2008_22.pdf A collection of benchmark examples for model reduction of linear time invariant dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;; SLICOT Working Note 2002-2: February 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmark examples for model reduction of linear time invariant dynamical systems: http://www.icm.tu-bs.de/NICONET/benchmodred.html&lt;br /&gt;
* Oberwolfach Model Reduction Benchmark Collection: http://portal.uni-freiburg.de/imteksimulation/downloads/benchmark&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Editors: &lt;br /&gt;
{{editors}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Submission_rules&amp;diff=1393</id>
		<title>Submission rules</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Submission_rules&amp;diff=1393"/>
		<updated>2013-05-03T12:36:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__&lt;br /&gt;
The MOR benchmark collection contains benchmarks related to model order reduction. Its goal is to supply the dynamical systems in a computer-readable format  to researchers from different areas. They can then test new algorithms, software, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The collection contains documents and wikipages that are supposed to be processed by a human being and data files that are supposed to be read automatically by software. As a result, with minor exceptions, the rules concerning documents have a recommendation status, and the rules concerning data files are obligatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start with describing the benchmark creation process, then we present the description of what content is needed on the wikipages as well as the supplement documents, and finally we describe the data files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Benchmark Creation==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone who has an example that could be relevant for this MOR benchmark collection can add it to the collection, after the editors decide that it is suitable for our collection. In order to be allowed to create a benchmark, one has to write an email to the editors asking for access to the wiki describing the benchmark to be created. If the editors accept the benchmark they grant access to the authors and create an empty page for the benchmark. The submitter needs to then edit the created wikipage that links to the data files as well as to further explanatory documents, if necessary. See 2.1 for the content requirement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Content Rules==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The supplementary documents as well as the wikipage may be written by different authors, however each individual document should be written according to conventional scientific practice, that is, it describes the matters in such a way that, at least in principle, anyone could reproduce the results presented. The authors should understand that the document may be read by people from quite different disciplines. Hence, abbreviations should be avoided or at least explained and references to the background ideas should be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Content Requirement===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of this content could be included in the wiki page directly, is however not necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
One should describe the origin of the dynamic system and its relevance to the application area. It is important to present the mathematical model, the meaning of the inputs and outputs, and the desired behavior from the application viewpoint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following points should be considered and if possible included in your benchmark:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The purpose of the model should be explained clearly. (For instance, simulation, iterative system design, feedback control design, ...)&lt;br /&gt;
* Why should the model be reduced at all? (For instance, reducing simulation time, reducing implementation effort in observers, controllers...)&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the QUALITATIVE requirements to the reduced model? What variables are to be approximated well? Is the step response to be approximated or is it the bode plot? What are typical input signals? (Some systems are driven by a step function and nothing else, others are driven by a wide variety of input signals, others are used in closed loops and can cause instabilities, although being stable themselves.)&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the QUANTITATIVE requirements to the reduced model? Best would be if the authors of any individual model can suggest some cost functions (performance indices) to be used for the comparison. These can be in time domain, or in frequency domain (including bandwidth), or both.&lt;br /&gt;
* Are there limits of input and state variables known? (application related or generally)? What are the physical limits where the model becomes useless/false? If known a-priori: Out of the technically typical input signals, which one will cause &amp;quot;the most nonlinear&amp;quot; behavior?&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parameters are included in the model, are they physical parameters or geometrical parameters.&lt;br /&gt;
* Is the system linear or nonlinear? Is it a first or a second order system? &lt;br /&gt;
* When the model is used to test, e.g. an algorithm, can some of the parameters in the model be fixed, such that the model includes fewer parameters, which makes the testing easier?&lt;br /&gt;
* If possible, the source code which generates the model is encouraged to be provided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We stress the importance to describe the software employed, as well as its related options. For example, if the model is generated from ANSYS, the software ANSYS is better to be mentioned. If necessary, please also describe some related options like boundary conditions, initial conditions, and other parameters which need to be assigned when generating the model. Please go to the benchmark webpage [[Silicon nitride membrane]] for a reference. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If the dynamic system is obtained from partial differential equations, then the information about material properties, geometrical data, initial and boundary conditions should be given. The exception to this rule is the case when the original model comes from industry. In this case, if trade secrets are tied with the information mentioned, it may be kept hidden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The authors are encouraged to produce several dynamic models of different dimensions in order to provide an opportunity to apply different software and to research scalability issues. If an author has an interactive page on his/her server to generate benchmarks, a link to this page is welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The dynamic system may be obtained by means of compound matrices, for example, when the second-order system is converted to first-order. In this case, the document should describe such a transformation but in the data file the original and not the compound matrices should be given. This allows to research other ways of model reduction of the original system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above information is in a general sense. Therefore, some items may not be applicable to certain benchmarks. However, it is recommended that the items that apply to the benchmark provided should be fully considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Additional Content===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will typically be given in form of a document which we restrict to  the following types: *.pdf, *.gif, *.jpeg, *.jpg, *.png,. This documents should include author names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The solution of the original benchmark that contains sample outputs for the usual input signals. Plots and numerical values of time and frequency response. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors, singular values, poles, zeros, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
# Model reduction and its results as compared to the original system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Description of any other related results.&lt;br /&gt;
# We stress the importance of describing the software employed as well as its related options.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data Files==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the numerical data for the collection can be considered as a list of matrices, a vector being a m x 1 matrix. As a result, there should be a naming convention for the matrices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Naming convention===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a state vector, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of parameters in the system, if any.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the two cases of a linear system of first and second order, the naming convention should be written as follows&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
    E (\mu) \dot x &amp;amp;= A(\mu) x + B(\mu)u\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) u  &lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
    M(\mu) \ddot x + E(\mu) \dot x + K(\mu) x &amp;amp;= B(\mu)u\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) u&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We recommend to use for nonlinear models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
   M(\mu) \ddot x + E(\mu) \dot x + K(\mu) x &amp;amp;= B(\mu) u + F(\mu) g(x,u,\mu)\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) f(x, u,\mu)&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An author can use another notation in the case when the convention above is not appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Matrix format for linear non-parametric or parametric affine systems===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the linear non-parametric systems and the parametric affine systems, the matrices of the systems are constant matrices. Such matrices should be written in the Matrix Market format as described at http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A file with a matrix should be named as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    problem_name.matrix_name&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is no file for a matrix, it is assumed to be identity for the E matrix and 0 for the D matrix.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All matrix files for a given problem should be compressed in a single zip or tar.gz archive, there should be a folder in the archive which is named with &amp;quot;problem_name&amp;quot; or with the abbreviated problem name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Matrix format for nonlinear or parametric non-affine systems===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the parametric non-affine systems, or nonlinear systems, the system matrices are coupled with the parameters and/or the state vectors. In this case, the system matrices should be analytically described if possible. For example, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A(1,1)=x_1^2+x_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A(i,2)=\mu_i^3 x_i, i=1,2,\ldots m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, etc., where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the parameters, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;th entry in the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If the system matrices are too complicated to be described analytically, or in plain text, the source code to generate the matrices should be available (or at  &lt;br /&gt;
least should be sent after contacting the responsible person).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Younès Chahlaoui and Paul Van Dooren. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://eprints.ma.man.ac.uk/1040/01/covered/MIMS_ep2008_22.pdf A collection of benchmark examples for model reduction of linear time invariant dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;; SLICOT Working Note 2002-2: February 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmark examples for model reduction of linear time invariant dynamical systems: http://www.icm.tu-bs.de/NICONET/benchmodred.html&lt;br /&gt;
* Oberwolfach Model Reduction Benchmark Collection: http://portal.uni-freiburg.de/imteksimulation/downloads/benchmark&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Editors: &lt;br /&gt;
{{editors}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Submission_rules&amp;diff=1373</id>
		<title>Submission rules</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Submission_rules&amp;diff=1373"/>
		<updated>2013-05-02T07:57:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Content Requirement */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__&lt;br /&gt;
The MOR benchmark collection contains benchmarks related to model order reduction. Its goal is to supply the dynamical systems in a computer-readable format  to researchers from different areas. They can then test new algorithms, software, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The collection contains documents and wikipages that are supposed to be processed by a human being and data files that are supposed to be read automatically by software. As a result, with minor exceptions, the rules concerning documents have a recommendation status, and the rules concerning data files are obligatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start with describing the benchmark creation process, then we present the description of what content is needed on the wikipages as well as the supplement documents, and finally we describe the data files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Benchmark Creation==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone who has an example that could be relevant for this MOR benchmark collection can add it to the collection, after the editors decide that it is suitable for our collection. In order to be allowed to create a benchmark, one has to write an email to the editors asking for access to the wiki describing the benchmark to be created. If the editors accept the benchmark they grant access to the authors and create an empty page for the benchmark. The submitter needs to then create an introductory wikipage that links to the data files as well as to further explanatory documents, if necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Content Rules==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The supplementary documents as well as the wikipage may be written by different authors, however each individual document should be written according to conventional scientific practice, that is, it describes the matters in such a way that, at least in principle, anyone could reproduce the results presented. The authors should understand that the document may be read by people from quite different disciplines. Hence, abbreviations should be avoided or at least explained and references to the background ideas should be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Content Requirement===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of this content could be included in the wiki page directly, is however not necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
One should describe the origin of the dynamic system and its relevance to the application area. It is important to present the mathematical model, the meaning of the inputs and outputs, and the desired behavior from the application viewpoint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following points should be considered and if possible included in your benchmark:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The purpose of the model should be explained clearly. (For instance, simulation, iterative system design, feedback control design, ...)&lt;br /&gt;
* Why should the model be reduced at all? (For instance, reducing simulation time, reducing implementation effort in observers, controllers...)&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the QUALITATIVE requirements to the reduced model? What variables are to be approximated well? Is the step response to be approximated or is it the bode plot? What are typical input signals? (Some systems are driven by a step function and nothing else, others are driven by a wide variety of input signals, others are used in closed loops and can cause instabilities, although being stable themselves.)&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the QUANTITATIVE requirements to the reduced model? Best would be if the authors of any individual model can suggest some cost functions (performance indices) to be used for the comparison. These can be in time domain, or in frequency domain (including bandwidth), or both.&lt;br /&gt;
* Are there limits of input and state variables known? (application related or generally)? What are the physical limits where the model becomes useless/false? If known a-priori: Out of the technically typical input signals, which one will cause &amp;quot;the most nonlinear&amp;quot; behavior?&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parameters are included in the model, are they physical parameters or geometrical parameters.&lt;br /&gt;
* Is the system linear or nonlinear? Is it a first or a second order system? &lt;br /&gt;
* When the model is used to test, e.g. an algorithm, can some of the parameters in the model be fixed, such that the model includes fewer parameters, which makes the testing easier?&lt;br /&gt;
* If possible, the source code which generates the model is encouraged to be provided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We stress the importance to describe the software employed, as well as its related options. For example, if the model is generated from ANSYS, the software ANSYS is better to be mentioned. If necessary, please also describe some related options like boundary conditions, initial conditions, and other parameters which need to be assigned when generating the model. Please go to the benchmark webpage [[Silicon nitride membrane]] for a reference. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If the dynamic system is obtained from partial differential equations, then the information about material properties, geometrical data, initial and boundary conditions should be given. The exception to this rule is the case when the original model comes from industry. In this case, if trade secrets are tied with the information mentioned, it may be kept hidden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The authors are encouraged to produce several dynamic models of different dimensions in order to provide an opportunity to apply different software and to research scalability issues. If an author has an interactive page on his/her server to generate benchmarks, a link to this page is welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The dynamic system may be obtained by means of compound matrices, for example, when the second-order system is converted to first-order. In this case, the document should describe such a transformation but in the data file the original and not the compound matrices should be given. This allows to research other ways of model reduction of the original system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above information is in a general sense. Therefore, some items may not be applicable to certain benchmarks. However, it is recommended that the items that apply to the benchmark provided should be fully considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Additional Content===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will typically be given in form of a document which we restrict to  the following types: *.pdf, *.gif, *.jpeg, *.jpg, *.png,. This documents should include author names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The solution of the original benchmark that contains sample outputs for the usual input signals. Plots and numerical values of time and frequency response. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors, singular values, poles, zeros, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
# Model reduction and its results as compared to the original system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Description of any other related results.&lt;br /&gt;
# We stress the importance of describing the software employed as well as its related options.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data Files==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the numerical data for the collection can be considered as a list of matrices, a vector being a m x 1 matrix. As a result, there should be a naming convention for the matrices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Naming convention===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a state vector, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of parameters in the system, if any.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the two cases of a linear system of first and second order, the naming convention should be written as follows&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
    E (\mu) \dot x &amp;amp;= A(\mu) x + B(\mu)u\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) u  &lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
    M(\mu) \ddot x + E(\mu) \dot x + K(\mu) x &amp;amp;= B(\mu)u\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) u&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We recommend to use for nonlinear models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
   M(\mu) \ddot x + E(\mu) \dot x + K(\mu) x &amp;amp;= B(\mu) u + F(\mu) g(x,u,\mu)\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) f(x, u,\mu)&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An author can use another notation in the case when the convention above is not appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Matrix format for linear non-parametric or parametric affine systems===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the linear non-parametric systems and the parametric affine systems, the matrices of the systems are constant matrices. Such matrices should be written in the Matrix Market format as described at http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A file with a matrix should be named as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    problem_name.matrix_name&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is no file for a matrix, it is assumed to be identity for the E matrix and 0 for the D matrix.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All matrix files for a given problem should be compressed in a single zip or tar.gz archive, there should be a folder in the archive which is named with &amp;quot;problem_name&amp;quot; or with the abbreviated problem name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Matrix format for nonlinear or parametric non-affine systems===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the parametric non-affine systems, or nonlinear systems, the system matrices are coupled with the parameters and/or the state vectors. In this case, the system matrices should be analytically described if possible. For example, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A(1,1)=x_1^2+x_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A(i,2)=\mu_i^3 x_i, i=1,2,\ldots m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, etc., where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the parameters, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;th entry in the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If the system matrices are too complicated to be described analytically, or in plain text, the source code to generate the matrices should be available (or at  &lt;br /&gt;
least should be sent after contacting the responsible person).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Younès Chahlaoui and Paul Van Dooren. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://eprints.ma.man.ac.uk/1040/01/covered/MIMS_ep2008_22.pdf A collection of benchmark examples for model reduction of linear time invariant dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;; SLICOT Working Note 2002-2: February 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmark examples for model reduction of linear time invariant dynamical systems: http://www.icm.tu-bs.de/NICONET/benchmodred.html&lt;br /&gt;
* Oberwolfach Model Reduction Benchmark Collection: http://portal.uni-freiburg.de/imteksimulation/downloads/benchmark&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Editors: &lt;br /&gt;
{{editors}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Submission_rules&amp;diff=1372</id>
		<title>Submission rules</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Submission_rules&amp;diff=1372"/>
		<updated>2013-05-02T07:46:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__&lt;br /&gt;
The MOR benchmark collection contains benchmarks related to model order reduction. Its goal is to supply the dynamical systems in a computer-readable format  to researchers from different areas. They can then test new algorithms, software, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The collection contains documents and wikipages that are supposed to be processed by a human being and data files that are supposed to be read automatically by software. As a result, with minor exceptions, the rules concerning documents have a recommendation status, and the rules concerning data files are obligatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start with describing the benchmark creation process, then we present the description of what content is needed on the wikipages as well as the supplement documents, and finally we describe the data files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Benchmark Creation==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone who has an example that could be relevant for this MOR benchmark collection can add it to the collection, after the editors decide that it is suitable for our collection. In order to be allowed to create a benchmark, one has to write an email to the editors asking for access to the wiki describing the benchmark to be created. If the editors accept the benchmark they grant access to the authors and create an empty page for the benchmark. The submitter needs to then create an introductory wikipage that links to the data files as well as to further explanatory documents, if necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Content Rules==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The supplementary documents as well as the wikipage may be written by different authors, however each individual document should be written according to conventional scientific practice, that is, it describes the matters in such a way that, at least in principle, anyone could reproduce the results presented. The authors should understand that the document may be read by people from quite different disciplines. Hence, abbreviations should be avoided or at least explained and references to the background ideas should be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Content Requirement===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of this content could be included in the wiki page directly, is however not necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
One should describe the origin of the dynamic system and its relevance to the application area. It is important to present the mathematical model, the meaning of the inputs and outputs, and the desired behavior from the application viewpoint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following points should be concidered and if possible included in your benchmark:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The purpose of the model should be explained clearly. (For instance, simulation, iterative system design, feedback control design, ...)&lt;br /&gt;
* Why should the model be reduced at all? (For instance, reducing simulation time, reducing implementation effort in observers, controllers...)&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the QUALITATIVE requirements to the reduced model? What variables are to be approximated well? Is the step response to be approximated or is it the bode plot? What are typical input signals? (Some systems are driven by a step function and nothing else, others are driven by a wide variety of input signals, others are used in closed loops and can cause instabilities, although being stable themselves.)&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the QUANTITATIVE requirements to the reduced model? Best would be if the authors of any individual model can suggest some cost functions (performance indices) to be used for the comparison. These can be in time domain, or in frequency domain (including bandwidth), or both.&lt;br /&gt;
* Are there limits of input and state variables known? (application related or generally)? What are the physical limits where the model becomes useless/false? If known a-priori: Out of the technically typical input signals, which one will cause &amp;quot;the most nonlinear&amp;quot; behavior?&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parameters are included in the model, are they physical parameters or geometrical parameters.&lt;br /&gt;
* Is the system linear or nonlinear? Is it a first or a second order system? &lt;br /&gt;
* When the model is used to test, e.g. an algorithm, can some of the parameters in the model be fixed, such that the model includes fewer parameters, which makes the testing easier?&lt;br /&gt;
* If possible, the source code which generates the model is encouraged to be provided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We stress the importance to describe the software employed, as well as its related options. For example, if the model is generated from ANSYS, the software ANSYS is better to be mentioned. If necessary, please also describe some related options like boundary conditions, initial conditions, and other parameters which need to be assigned when generating the model. Please go to the benchmark webpage [[Silicon nitride membrane]] for a reference. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If the dynamic system is obtained from partial differential equations, then the information about material properties, geometrical data, initial and boundary conditions should be given. The exception to this rule is the case when the original model comes from industry. In this case, if trade secrets are tied with the information mentioned, it may be kept hidden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The authors are encouraged to produce several dynamic models of different dimensions in order to provide an opportunity to apply different software and to research scalability issues. If an author has an interactive page on his/her server to generate benchmarks, a link to this page is welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The dynamic system may be obtained by means of compound matrices, for example, when the second-order system is converted to first-order. In this case, the document should describe such a transformation but in the data file the original and not the compound matrices should be given. This allows to research other ways of model reduction of the original system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above information is in a general sense. Therefore, some items may not be applicable to certain benchmarks. However, it is recommended that the items that apply to the benchmark provided should be fully considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Additional Content===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will typically be given in form of a document which we restrict to  the following types: *.pdf, *.gif, *.jpeg, *.jpg, *.png,. This documents should include author names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The solution of the original benchmark that contains sample outputs for the usual input signals. Plots and numerical values of time and frequency response. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors, singular values, poles, zeros, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
# Model reduction and its results as compared to the original system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Description of any other related results.&lt;br /&gt;
# We stress the importance of describing the software employed as well as its related options.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data Files==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the numerical data for the collection can be considered as a list of matrices, a vector being a m x 1 matrix. As a result, there should be a naming convention for the matrices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Naming convention===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a state vector, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a vector of parameters in the system, if any.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the two cases of a linear system of first and second order, the naming convention should be written as follows&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
    E (\mu) \dot x &amp;amp;= A(\mu) x + B(\mu)u\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) u  &lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
    M(\mu) \ddot x + E(\mu) \dot x + K(\mu) x &amp;amp;= B(\mu)u\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) u&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We recommend to use for nonlinear models&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  \begin{align}&lt;br /&gt;
   M(\mu) \ddot x + E(\mu) \dot x + K(\mu) x &amp;amp;= B(\mu) u + F(\mu) g(x,u,\mu)\\&lt;br /&gt;
    y &amp;amp;= C(\mu) x + D(\mu) f(x, u,\mu)&lt;br /&gt;
  \end{align}&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An author can use another notation in the case when the convention above is not appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Matrix format for linear non-parametric or parametric affine systems===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the linear non-parametric systems and the parametric affine systems, the matrices of the systems are constant matrices. Such matrices should be written in the Matrix Market format as described at http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A file with a matrix should be named as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    problem_name.matrix_name&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is no file for a matrix, it is assumed to be identity for the E matrix and 0 for the D matrix.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All matrix files for a given problem should be compressed in a single zip or tar.gz archive, there should be a folder in the archive which is named with &amp;quot;problem_name&amp;quot; or with the abbreviated problem name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Matrix format for nonlinear or parametric non-affine systems===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the parametric non-affine systems, or nonlinear systems, the system matrices are coupled with the parameters and/or the state vectors. In this case, the system matrices should be analytically described if possible. For example, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A(1,1)=x_1^2+x_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A(i,2)=\mu_i^3 x_i, i=1,2,\ldots m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, etc., where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the parameters, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;th entry in the state vector &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If the system matrices are too complicated to be described analytically, or in plain text, the source code to generate the matrices should be available (or at  &lt;br /&gt;
least should be sent after contacting the responsible person).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Younès Chahlaoui and Paul Van Dooren. &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://eprints.ma.man.ac.uk/1040/01/covered/MIMS_ep2008_22.pdf A collection of benchmark examples for model reduction of linear time invariant dynamical systems]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;; SLICOT Working Note 2002-2: February 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmark examples for model reduction of linear time invariant dynamical systems: http://www.icm.tu-bs.de/NICONET/benchmodred.html&lt;br /&gt;
* Oberwolfach Model Reduction Benchmark Collection: http://portal.uni-freiburg.de/imteksimulation/downloads/benchmark&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Editors: &lt;br /&gt;
{{editors}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Pad%C3%A9_approximation_methods&amp;diff=1331</id>
		<title>Padé approximation methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Pad%C3%A9_approximation_methods&amp;diff=1331"/>
		<updated>2013-04-29T10:08:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear algebra]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These kind of methods are also called the [[Krylov subspace MOR methods]] or the [[moment-matching method]]s.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Pad%C3%A9_approximation_methods&amp;diff=1330</id>
		<title>Padé approximation methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Pad%C3%A9_approximation_methods&amp;diff=1330"/>
		<updated>2013-04-29T10:07:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear algebra]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These kind of methods are also called the [[Krylov subspace MOR method]]s or the [[moment-matching method]]s.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Pad%C3%A9_approximation_methods&amp;diff=1329</id>
		<title>Padé approximation methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Pad%C3%A9_approximation_methods&amp;diff=1329"/>
		<updated>2013-04-29T10:07:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear algebra]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These kind of methods are also called the [[Krylov subspace method]]s or the [[moment-matching method]]s.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Pad%C3%A9_approximation_methods&amp;diff=1328</id>
		<title>Padé approximation methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Pad%C3%A9_approximation_methods&amp;diff=1328"/>
		<updated>2013-04-29T10:04:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: Created page with &amp;quot;Categary: method&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Categary: method]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Krylov_subspace_MOR_methods&amp;diff=1327</id>
		<title>Krylov subspace MOR methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Krylov_subspace_MOR_methods&amp;diff=1327"/>
		<updated>2013-04-29T10:00:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear algebra]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Krylov subspace MOR methods may refer to the [[moment-matching method]] for non-parametric (deterministic) systems or the [[moment-matching PMOR method]] for parametric systems.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Krylov_subspace_MOR_methods&amp;diff=1326</id>
		<title>Krylov subspace MOR methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Krylov_subspace_MOR_methods&amp;diff=1326"/>
		<updated>2013-04-29T10:00:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear algebra]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Krylov subspace MOR methods may refer to the [[moment-matching method]] for non-parametric (deterministic) systems or the [[moment-matching PMOR method]] for parametric systems.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Krylov_subspace_MOR_methods&amp;diff=1325</id>
		<title>Krylov subspace MOR methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Krylov_subspace_MOR_methods&amp;diff=1325"/>
		<updated>2013-04-29T09:59:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear algebra]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Krylov subspace MOR methods may refer to the [[moment-matching method]] for non-parametric (deterministic) systems or the [[multi-moment matching MOR method]] for parametric systems.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Krylov_subspace_MOR_methods&amp;diff=1324</id>
		<title>Krylov subspace MOR methods</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Krylov_subspace_MOR_methods&amp;diff=1324"/>
		<updated>2013-04-29T09:54:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: Created page with &amp;quot;Categary method&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Categary [[method]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Moment-matching_method&amp;diff=1323</id>
		<title>Moment-matching method</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://modelreduction.org/morwiki/index.php?title=Moment-matching_method&amp;diff=1323"/>
		<updated>2013-04-29T09:52:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feng: /* Description */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:method]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DAE order unspecified]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:first differential order]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linear algebra]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
The moment-matching methods are also called the &#039;&#039;Krylov&#039;&#039; subspace methods&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;freund03&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;, as well as &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Padé&#039;&#039; approximation methods&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feldmann95&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. They belongs to the [[Projection based MOR]] methods. These methods are applicable for non-parametric linear time invariant systems, often the descriptor systems, e.g.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E \frac{dx(t)}{dt}=A x(t)+B u(t), \quad&lt;br /&gt;
y(t)=Cx(t),    \quad \quad (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are very efficient in many engineering applications, such as circuit simulation, Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) simulation, etc..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The basic steps are as follows. First, the transfer function&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;H(s)=Y(s)/U(s)=C(sE-A)^{-1}B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
is expanded into a power series at an expansion point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_0\in\mathbb{C}\cup \infty&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s=s_0+\sigma&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then, within the convergence radius of the series, we have&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;H(s_0 + \sigma)= C[(s_{0}+\sigma){E}-A]^{-1}B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;=C[\sigma { E}+(s_{0}{ E}-{ A})]^{-1}B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;=C[{ I}+\sigma(s_0{ E}-{ A})^{-1}E]^{-1}[(s_0{ E}-{ A})]^{-1}B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;=C[{ I}-\sigma(s_0{ E}- A )^{-1}E+\sigma^2[(s_0{ E}-{ A})^{-1}E]^{2}+\ldots]&lt;br /&gt;
s_0{E}-{ A})^{-1}B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;=\sum \limits^\infty_{i=0}\underbrace{C[-(s_0{ E}-{A})^{-1}E]^i(s_0{ E}-{ A})^{-1}B}_{:= m_i(s_0)} \, \sigma^i,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_i(s_0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are called the moments of the transfer function about &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i=0,1,2,\ldots&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
If the expansion point is chosen as zero, then the moments simplify to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_i(0)=C(A^{-1}E)^i(-A^{-1}B)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The goal in moment-matching model reduction is the construction of a reduced order&lt;br /&gt;
system where some moments &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat m_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the associated transfer function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; match some moments&lt;br /&gt;
of the original transfer function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for model order reduction can be computed&lt;br /&gt;
from the vectors which are associated with the moments, for&lt;br /&gt;
example, using a single expansion point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_0=0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, by&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{range}(V)=\textrm{span}\{\tilde B,({ A}^{-1}E)^2 \tilde B, \ldots,({ A}^{-1}E)^{r}{\tilde B}\},  \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad \  (2) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{range}(W)=\textrm{span}\{C^T, E^T{ A}^{-T}C^T,(E^T{A}^{-T})^2C^T, \ldots&lt;br /&gt;
,(E^T{A}^{-T})^{r-1}C^T\}, \quad \quad (3) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tilde B=-A^{-1}B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transfer function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\hat H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the reduced model has good approximation properties around &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which matches the first &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moments of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;H(s)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a set of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; distinct expansion points &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\{s_1,\cdots,s_k\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the reduced model obtained by, e.g.,&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{range}(V)=\textrm{span}\{(A-s_1 {E})^{-1}E\tilde B,\ldots,(A-s_k {E})^{-1}E\tilde B   \}  \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad (4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{range}(W)=\textrm{span}\{E^T(A-s_1 {E})^{-T}C^T,\ldots,E^T(A-s_k {E})^{-T}C^T \},\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad (5) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
matches the first two moments at each &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s_j&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;j=1,\ldots,k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, see &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;grimme97&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;. The reduced model is in the form as below &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W^TE \frac{d{V z}}{t}=W^TA Vz +W^T B u(t), \quad \hat{y}(t)=CVz.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the case of one expansion point in (2)(3), it can be seen that the columns of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; span Krylov subspaces&lt;br /&gt;
which can easily be computed by Arnoldi or Lanczos methods. The matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; in (4)(5) can be computed with the rational Krylov algorithm in&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;grimme97&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; or with the modified Gram-Schmidt process. In these algorithms only a few number of linear systems need to be solved, where matrix-vector multiplications are only used if using iterative solvers, which are simple to implement and the complexity of the resulting&lt;br /&gt;
methods is roughly &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O(n r^2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for sparse matrices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A, E&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;freund03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;R.W. Freund, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0962492902000120 Model reduction methods based on Krylov subspaces]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Acta Numerica, 12:267-319, 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;feldmann95&amp;quot;&amp;gt;P. Feldmann and R.W. Freund, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/43.384428 Efficient linear circuit analysis by Pade approximation via the Lanczos process]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst., 14:639-649, 1995.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;grimme97&amp;quot;&amp;gt;E.J. Grimme, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.19.9254&amp;amp;rep=rep1&amp;amp;type=pdf Krylov projection methods for model reduction]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;. PhD thesis, Univ. Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Feng</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>